Global Economic Conditions
1. The momentum of global recovery,
which exceeded expectations in the first half
of 2010, has slowed down in the last few
months. The IMF revised its projection of
global growth for 2010 to 4.8 per cent, up
from its earlier projection of 4.6 per cent,
on the strength of performance in the first
half. However, the IMF projects global
growth to decelerate to 4.2 per cent in 2011.
2. In advanced economies, the weakening
of recovery has raised concerns about both
unemployment and deflation. With capacity
for fiscal stimulus already stretched and
given the concerns about sovereign debt,
further quantitative easing seems the preferred option to address the weakness
in growth. The persisting output gap could
tempt advanced economies to resort to
protectionist measures along with
preference for undervalued exchange rates,
and that could pose downside risks to
global recovery.
3. EMEs, which had led the global
recovery, continue to exhibit strong growth
momentum. Notwithstanding some likely
moderation in the momentum in the second
half of the year, the growth imbalance
relative to advanced economies is expected
to persist. The widening asymmetry in
monetary exit points to the possibility of
larger capital inflows into EMEs, exerting
potential pressures on their asset prices and
exchange rates. Furthermore, given the visible pressure on capacity in certain
EMEs relative to buoyant domestic demand,
as well as rising global commodity and food
prices since the mid-year, risks to inflation
in EMEs have increased.
4. While corporate profits and stock
prices have generally recovered globally,
the dampening effects of unfinished
deleveraging and depressed bank lending
in advanced economies continue to hinder
global recovery. The growing uncertainty
in the global markets impacted Indian
financial markets through two different
channels, viz., pressure on the Indian Rupee
to appreciate and rise in equity prices due
to sharp increase in portfolio flows.
Indian Economy-Trends and the Outlook
Output
5. The sharp and broad-based recovery
of the Indian economy, which started in the
second half of 2009-10 continued through
Q1 of 2010-11, leading to further
consolidation of growth around the trend.
A normal monsoon, following a severely
deficient monsoon last year, is expected to
lift the agriculture sector growth to above
the trend rate of growth in 2010-11.
Industrial production showed robust growth
though with wide volatility around the
trend. The core infrastructure sector
continues to lag behind the pace of growth
in industrial production. Lead indicators
of services activities, however, suggest continuation of the momentum. The current
data and indicators of economic
performance remain consistent with the 8.5
per cent growth projected in the July 2010
Monetary Policy Statement.
Aggregate Demand
6. Given the weakening external demand
conditions and the need for fiscal
consolidation, sustained growth will hinge
increasingly on private consumption and
investment demand. Trends in production of
capital goods, capital expenditure plans of
corporates, non-oil imports and growth in
credit as well as financing from non-banking
sources during 2010-11 so far suggest strong
conditions for investment activities. Private
consumption expenditure data for the first
quarter of 2010-11, and the trends in
corporate sales as well as production of
consumer durables point to a pick up. The
contribution of government demand to growth
in 2010-11 is expected to weaken given the
policy emphasis on fiscal consolidation. While
both revenue deficit and fiscal deficit, as
percentage of GDP, have been lower so far
in the current year relative to the
corresponding period of last year, there has
been higher growth in both revenue and
capital expenditure this year, thereby
providing demand support to the growth
process. The contribution of net exports to
growth on the expenditure side of GDP was
negative in the first quarter of 2010-11, a
trend expected to continue during the rest of
the year. Overall aggregate expenditure
trends point to persistence of momentum.
External Sector
7. The current account deficit in the
balance of payments widened in the first quarter of 2010-11 due to a higher trade
deficit and moderation of the surplus in the
invisibles account. Capital flows, led by FII
flows in recent months, have met the
financing needs of the current account
deficit. Despite the appreciation of the
Indian rupee on the basis of 6-currency real
effective exchange rate (REER) during the
year so far, over and above the significant
appreciation last year, the 36 currency
REER remains largely stable. The higher
inflation differential between India and its
major trading partners, however, is a
source of pressure on the competitiveness
of Indian exports. The current account
deficit, as percentage of GDP, could be
expected to be higher in 2010-11 than the
2.9 per cent recorded in 2009-10. While
capital inflows into EMEs including India
are expected to remain buoyant, a higher
level of current account deficit is a concern.
While the deficit may be fully financed by
capital inflows, the potential volatility in
such flows poses some risk. The exchange
rate of the Indian rupee remained flexible
moving both ways, as net intervention in
the foreign exchange market since 2009-
10 has remained negligible. As on October
22, 2010, the foreign exchange reserves
stood at US$ 295.4 billion.
Monetary and Liquidity Conditions
8. Liquidity conditions became tight in
the month of May 2010 consequent to the
transfer of liquidity from the markets to the
government in the wake of the 3G/BWA
auctions. Since then, liquidity conditions
have generally remained in the deficit
mode, which is consistent with the monetary
policy stance of the Reserve Bank. Policy
interest rates have been raised five times
since the beginning of March 2010, raising the repo rate by 125 basis points and the
reverse repo rate by 175 basis points. This
asymmetric tightening narrowed the policy
corridor from 150 basis points to 100 basis
points. With repo replacing reverse repo
as the operative rate in the LAF, the
effective policy interest rate has increased
by 275 basis points since March 2010.
Broad money (M3) continues to exhibit
subdued growth reflecting the pattern in the
growth of aggregate deposits. With nonfood
credit growth converging to the 20 per
cent growth trajectory indicated in the First
Quarter Review of Monetary Policy, banks
have scaled up their deposit mobilisation
efforts as evident from the higher deposit
rates being offered since July 2010. Nonbank
financing has emerged as a major
source of financing for investment, and in
the first half of 2010-11, financing from
external sources in particular increased.
Financial Markets
9. In the global financial markets,
concerns about sovereign defaults eased, but
they were replaced by concerns about risks
stemming from the slowdown in global
recovery. The multi-speed recovery across
the world and the consequent differential exit
from the accommodative monetary stance
has strengthened both the push and pull
factors underlying the significant pick up in
private capital flows to EMEs. In the Indian
financial markets, the impact of this trend
has been visible in the appreciation of the
exchange rate of the rupee against the US
dollar and the bullish spikes in equity prices.
The transmission of higher policy interest
rates and deficit liquidity conditions
strengthened across different segments of the
financial markets, ranging from CPs, CDs,
CBLO, Treasury Bills, government securities and bank deposits. The transmission to bank
lending rates is evident with a lag. Some
banks have recently announced increase in
their Base Rates. Since the introduction of
the Base Rate, activities in the CPs market
have picked up, as corporates explored
alternative financing. Banks also resorted
to CDs for raising bulk deposits. Housing
prices in major cities generally increased.
Inflation
10. The headline inflation data since
August 2010 are based on the new series,
reflecting the altered consumption pattern
and the price trends at a disaggregated
level and hence capture the current
structure of the economy better. As per the
new series, the headline inflation after
remaining in double digits for five
successive months up to July 2010, has
begun to moderate. Inflation in non-food
manufactured products, which could be
seen as most sensitive to monetary policy
measures, has shown some moderation. But
food inflation remains disconcertingly high
despite a normal monsoon. This can be
partly attributed to a change in the
consumption pattern in favour of proteinrich
items such as eggs, milk, fish and meat
where price increases have been high.
Different measures of CPI inflation have
edged below the double digits levels after
more than a year. Despite moderation in
recent months, elevated WPI and CPI
inflation remain a challenge for monetary
policy.
Overall Assessment
11. As the growth outlook continues to be
robust, the objective of non-disruptive
normalisation of the policy rate seems to have been generally met. While non-food
manufacturing inflation, which could be seen
as most responsive to monetary policy, has
shown some moderation, elevated food price
inflation is a cause for concern. The
monetary policy measures introduced since
January 2010 could be expected to help in
moderating the headline inflation by March
2011. The possibility of rigidity in food
inflation, however, cannot be ruled out,
unless the supply situation is improved with
structural measures to match the growing
demand for non-staple food products. This
is particularly so because such downward
rigidity in inflation at an elevated level has resulted despite a normal monsoon and
range-bound international oil prices for
most part of the year. Anchoring inflation
expectations in such an environment is a
difficult challenge for monetary policy.
While moderating momentum of the nonfood
manufactured inflation suggests that
recent monetary actions are having an
impact, inflation still remains above the
comfort level. Going forward, the growthinflation
outlook will dominate the policy
response, and the nature and timing of
monetary policy actions would have to be
conditioned by their expected effectiveness
in attaining the intended goal.
|