VII PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT
As in the previous year, management of the large market borrowing programme of both the central as well as the
state governments in an inflationary situation posed a major challenge for the Reserve Bank. This was compounded
by tightness in liquidity and slowing growth, particularly in the second half of 2011-12. As inflationary
expectations remained high, the Reserve Bank successively hiked policy rates. There was pressure on the yield
curve, particularly at the shorter end. During the year, the Reserve Bank deftly pursued debt management
objectives along with liquidity and monetary management through OMOs and issuance of long-dated securities,
effectively containing the rise in the cost of borrowing of the government to a modest level.
VII.1 With continuing inflationary pressure in
2011-12, the Reserve Bank hiked policy rates by
175 basis points in five stages. Liquidity conditions
remained tight with a worsening in the last four
months of the financial year, while there was an
increase in government borrowing. The Reserve
Bank conducted the market borrowing programme
with the objective of minimising the cost of
borrowing for the government while pursuing debt
maturity profiles that posed a low rollover risk. In
2011-12, the net amount raised by the central
government through dated securities and 364-day
treasury bills was higher by around 48 per cent over
the previous year. The increase in net market
borrowing during the year was necessitated by the
shortfall in financing from other sources (such as
small savings, disinvestment proceeds, etc.) and
accelerated expenditure on account of two
supplementary demands for grants.
VII.2 Even though inflationary pressures and the
hikes in policy rates resulted in hardening of yields
in 2011-12, the increase in the cost of market
borrowings was contained by following appropriate
strategy. The OMO purchases through auction route
helped in injection of liquidity in the system.
DEBT MANAGEMENT OF THE CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT
Market Borrowings
VII.3 The gross amount raised through dated
securities and 364-day treasury bills in 2011-12
was higher by around 25 per cent than in the
previous year (Table VII.1). The increase in actual
market borrowing compared to the budget estimate
was higher for the central government compared
to the previous year. The central government’s gross
market borrowing through dated securities was
budgeted at `4,171 billion, which was increased in
two stages (September and December 2011) to `5,100 billion (net `4,364 billion) during 2011-12
as against `4,370 billion (net `3,254 billion) in 2010-
11. This enhanced market borrowing coupled with
the additional net borrowing through treasury bills
of `1,322 billion posed challenge for the debt
management operations of the Reserve Bank. The
revised market borrowing was, however, successfully
completed. An amount of ` 121.1 billion worth of
securities devolved on primary dealers during 2011-12 compared with `57.7 billion in the previous year.
Table VII.1: Gross and Net Market Borrowings of the Central Government# |
(` billion) |
Item |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
Budget
Estimate |
Revised
Estimate |
Actual |
Budget
Estimate |
Revised
Estimate |
Actual |
Budget
Estimate |
Actual@ |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Gross Borrowing |
4,986.3 |
4,885.9 |
4,794.8 |
4,697.4 |
6,003.7 |
6,003.8 |
6,739.9 |
3,093.8 |
Net Borrowing |
3,450.1 |
3,355.1 |
3,263.9 |
3,531.3 |
4,843.1 |
4,843.2 |
4,930.0 |
2,055.6 |
(i) Dated securities |
3,450.1 |
3,354.1 |
3,254.1 |
3,430.0 |
4,364.1 |
4,364.2 |
4,790.0 |
1,893.8 |
(ii) 364-day treasury bills |
0 |
1.0 |
9.8 |
101.3 |
479.0 |
479.0 |
140.0 |
161.8 |
#: Dated securities and 364-day treasury bills. @: Up to August 9, 2012. |
VII.4 Reflecting the impact of the Reserve Bank
rate actions, the weighted average yield of dated
securities issued during the year rose by 60 basis
points in 2011-12, though the weighted average
coupon on the outstanding stock of dated securities
rose only marginally by 7 basis points to 7.88 per
cent as on March 31, 2012 (Table VII.2). The yield
curve turned increasingly flat during 2011-12 as
reflected in the significant decline in yield spreads.
A large volume of long dated securities was issued
during the year in view of this flatness. As a result,
the average maturity of debt issuances increased
to 12.66 years from 11.62 years in 2010-11. The
weighted average maturity of the outstanding stock
(based on residual maturity), however, decreased
marginally to 9.74 years as on March 31, 2012. In
2011-12, about 26.4 per cent of the market
borrowing was through issuance of dated securities
of more than 15 years maturity compared with about
25.2 per cent in 2010-11 (Table VII.3).
Table VII.2: Central Government’s Market Loans – A Profile# |
(Yield in per cent, Maturity in years) |
Year |
Range of YTMs at Primary Issues |
Issues during the Year |
Outstanding Stock
(As at end-March) |
Under 5 years |
5-10 years |
Over 10
years |
Weighted
Average
Yield |
Tenor of
securities |
Weighted
Average
Maturity |
Weighted
Average
Coupon |
Weighted
Average
Maturity |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
2008-09 |
7.71-8.42 |
7.69-8.77 |
7.77-8.81 |
7.69 |
6-30 |
13.8 |
8.23 |
10.45 |
2009-10 |
6.09-7.25 |
6.07-7.77 |
6.85-8.43 |
7.23 |
5-15 |
11.16 |
7.89 |
9.82 |
2010-11 |
5.98-8.67 |
7.17-8.19 |
7.64-8.63 |
7.92 |
5-30 |
11.62 |
7.81 |
9.78 |
2011-12 |
8.21-8.49 |
7.80-10.01 |
8.25-9.28 |
8.52 |
7-30 |
12.66 |
7.88 |
9.74 |
#: Excludes issuances under MSS. YTM: Yield to Maturity. |
Table VII.3: Issuance of GoI Dated Securities – Maturity Pattern |
(` billion) |
Residual Maturity |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
Amount
raised |
Percentage to total |
Amount
raised |
Percentage to total |
Amount raised |
Percentage
to total |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Less than 5 years |
520 |
12.4 |
110 |
2.5 |
180 |
3.5 |
5 -9.99 years |
1,800 |
43.1 |
1,520 |
34.8 |
2,340 |
45.9 |
10-14.99 |
910 |
21.8 |
1,640 |
37.5 |
1,230 |
24.1 |
15 -19.99 years |
390 |
9.3 |
540 |
12.4 |
650 |
12.7 |
20 years and above |
560 |
13.4 |
560 |
12.8 |
700 |
13.7 |
Total |
4,180 |
100.0 |
4,370 |
100.0 |
5,100 |
100.0 |
VII.5 As per the union budget for 2012-13, the
gross market borrowing of the centre through dated
securities is estimated at `5,696 billion (net `4,790
billion). The issuance calendar for dated securities
for the first half of 2012-13 was issued in consultation
with the central government on March 27, 2012. An
amount of `3,700 billion is scheduled to be raised
during the first half of 2012-13, `1,200 billion more
than the amount raised during the corresponding
period of the previous year. The gross and the net
market borrowings through dated securities for
2012-13 are budgeted to be higher than the
previous year (RE) by 11.7 per cent and 9.8 per
cent, respectively. The central government raised
about 46.3 per cent of the total borrowing for 2012-
13 by August 9, 2012, with the weighted average
yield of dated securities issued being higher at 8.50
per cent compared with 8.39 per cent during the
corresponding period of the previous year.
Cash Management
VII.6 The government started the year 2011-12
with a modest surplus cash balance of `165 billion,
but soon took recourse to WMA on April 5, 2011
due to its expenditure commitments (Chart VII.1).
During the year, the government was in WMA for
263 days and availed OD on 15 occasions (74
days), compared with WMA for 57 days and OD for
two days in the previous year. During 2011-12, cash
management bills (CMBs) worth `930 billion (face
value) were issued in 14 tranches with maturities
of 35-77 days to meet temporary mismatches in
the cash position of the central government posing
a challenge to the market borrowing programme.
During 2011-12, the net issuances (inclusive of
non-competitive bids) of 91-day, 182-day and 364-
day treasury bills were `543 billion, `300 billion and
`479 billion, respectively. The total net issuance of
treasury bills amounted to `1,322 billion compared
with `3 billion in 2010-11.
|
VII.7 The initial WMA limit fixed at `300 billion for
the first half of 2011-12, was revised to `450 billion
for the first quarter of the year (from April 21, 2011).
Similarly, the WMA limit fixed at `100 billion for the
second half was revised to `200 billion for the third
quarter of the year. In consultation with the central
government, the WMA limit was fixed at `500 billion
for the first quarter of 2012-13 and `450 billion for
the second quarter.
DEBT MANAGEMENT OF STATE
GOVERNMENTS
Market Borrowings
VII.8 Despite a significant increase in the amount,
the gross market borrowing of the state governments
was conducted smoothly during 2011-12. The net
allocation under the market borrowing programme
for state governments for 2011-12 was `1,459
billion. Taking into account the repayments of `220
billion and additional allocation of `157 billion, the
gross allocation amounted to `1,835 billion [gross
sanctions under Article 293(3) amounted to `1,634
billion]. The state governments raised a gross
amount of `1,586 billion in 2011-12 as against
`1,040 billion in the previous year (Table VII.4).
Assam, Chhattisgarh and Odisha did not participate
in the market borrowing programme in 2011-12 as
against four states (viz., Arunachal Pradesh,
Chhattisgarh, Odisha and Sikkim) in 2010-11. There
were some instances of under-subscription in State
Development Loan (SDL) auctions during the year
due to the bunching of issuances towards the close
of the financial year. The Reserve Bank issued the
quarterly indicative quantum for the July-September
quarter in July 2012, which would enable orderly
conduct of market borrowing programmes of the
state governments. Fourteen states did not raise
their full sanctions in 2011-12 as against four states
in the previous year.
Table VII. 4 : States Market Borrowing |
(` billion) |
Item |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Net allocation |
1,421.6 |
1,458.6 |
Additional allocation |
59.7 |
156.7 |
Maturities during the year |
156.4 |
219.9 |
Gross allocation |
1,637.7 |
1,835.2 |
Gross sanctions under Article 293 (3) |
1,090.6 |
1,633.9 |
Gross amount raised during the year |
1,040.4 |
1,586.3 |
Net amount raised during the year |
884.0 |
1,366.4 |
Amount raised during the year as a per cent
of total sanctions |
95.4 |
97.1 |
VII.9 The weighted average yield of state
government securities issued during 2011-12 was
higher at 8.79 per cent, compared with 8.39 per
cent during the previous year. The weighted
average spread (i.e., the difference between the
weighted average primary market yield of SDL on
the day of auction and the secondary market yield
of corresponding maturity central government dated
security on the same day) marginally declined to
44 basis points during the year (45 basis points in
2010-11). Since 2005-06, states issue 10-year
securities only (Table VII.5).
Table VII.5: Residual Maturity Profile of
Outstanding State Development Loans
and Power Bonds (as at end-March 2012) |
(` billion) |
Year of Maturity |
State Development Loans |
Power Bonds |
Total |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2012-13 |
306.3 |
28.7 |
335.0 |
2013-14 |
320.8 |
28.7 |
349.5 |
2014-15 |
333.8 |
28.7 |
362.5 |
2015-16 |
351.9 |
27.9 |
379.8 |
2016-17 |
315.2 |
15.8 |
331.0 |
2017-18 |
677.8 |
0.0 |
677.8 |
2018-19 |
1,181.4 |
0.0 |
1,181.4 |
2019-20 |
1,306.2 |
0.0 |
1,306.2 |
2020-21 |
1,045.4 |
0.0 |
1,045.4 |
2021-22 |
1,586.3 |
0.0 |
1,586.3 |
Total |
7,425.1 |
129.7 |
7,554.8 |
Cash Management
VII.10 The aggregate ‘normal WMA’ limit for states,
including the union territory of Puducherry, was
`102.4 billion for 2011-12, same as in the previous
year. The monthly average utilisation of WMA and
OD by all states in 2011-12 was lower than in the
previous year (Table VII.6).
Table VII.6: Utilisation of WMA/OD and Investment of State Governments
(Average Monthly Outstanding) |
(` billion) |
Months |
Special WMA |
Normal WMA |
Overdraft |
Total |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
Apr |
5.9 |
9.7 |
4.6 |
2.9 |
7.0 |
3.9 |
1.9 |
8.7 |
2.8 |
10.7 |
25.4 |
11.3 |
May |
3.0 |
6.2 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
2.4 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
Neg |
3.1 |
9.0 |
1.5 |
Jun |
0.4 |
2.3 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
2.6 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
5.0 |
4.2 |
Jul |
Neg |
1.4 |
|
0.0 |
1.6 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Neg |
3.0 |
|
Aug |
0.1 |
1.6 |
|
1.2 |
2.7 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
1.3 |
4.2 |
|
Sep |
1.2 |
1.0 |
|
0.9 |
2.2 |
|
Neg |
0.1 |
|
2.1 |
3.3 |
|
Oct |
8.2 |
1.3 |
|
5.4 |
3.2 |
|
1.2 |
0.1 |
|
14.8 |
4.6 |
|
Nov |
9.0 |
5.4 |
|
4.8 |
1.6 |
|
2.4 |
0.0 |
|
16.2 |
6.9 |
|
Dec |
0.2 |
3.1 |
|
0.6 |
2.2 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
0.8 |
5.4 |
|
Jan |
4.5 |
2.7 |
|
1.1 |
1.3 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
5.7 |
4.1 |
|
Feb |
9.5 |
0.5 |
|
5.3 |
1.1 |
|
2.0 |
0.0 |
|
16.8 |
1.5 |
|
Mar |
8.9 |
0.2 |
|
3.6 |
1.3 |
|
2.6 |
0.3 |
|
15.1 |
1.8 |
|
Average |
4.2 |
2.9 |
|
2.2 |
2.1 |
|
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
7.2 |
5.8 |
|
Neg: Negligible. |
VII.11 Many state governments have accumulated
sizeable cash surpluses in the recent years. The
liquidity pressures during 2011-12 were thus
confined to a few states (Table VII.7). The surplus
cash balances of state governments are
automatically invested in 14-day Intermediate
Treasury Bills (ITBs), the discount rate of which is
currently fixed at 5 per cent.The average investment
in 14-day ITBs decreased during 2011-12, while
the average investment in Auction Treasury Bills
(ATBs) more than tripled (Table VII.8). The average
overall investment in ITBs and ATBs by states
increased from `885.1 billion in 2010-11 to `998.0
billion in 2011-12.
Table VII.7: No. of Days States Availed of Special/ Normal WMA and OD |
State |
Special WMA |
Normal WMA |
Overdraft |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Andhra Pradesh |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Haryana |
10 |
23 |
12 |
10 |
22 |
11 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
Nagaland |
0 |
41 |
120 |
0 |
20 |
75 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
Punjab |
133 |
177 |
33 |
132 |
177 |
30 |
13 |
26 |
25 |
Uttar Pradesh |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
West Bengal |
195 |
185 |
37 |
113 |
59 |
10 |
62 |
28 |
2 |
Manipur |
0 |
0 |
87 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
Mizoram |
25 |
15 |
5 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Uttarakhand |
35 |
57 |
0 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
Meghalaya |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Jharkhand |
0 |
5 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Jammu and Kashmir |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
136 |
47 |
- |
4 |
0 |
Table VII.8: Investments in ATBs and ITBs by State Governments/UTs |
(`billion) |
Month |
Investment in ATBs |
Investment in ITBs |
Total |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
April |
2.5 |
108.6 |
231.6 |
770.7 |
864.1 |
843.1 |
773.2 |
972.7 |
1,074.7 |
May |
2.5 |
145.3 |
318.8 |
766.3 |
728.1 |
768.2 |
768.8 |
873.4 |
1,087.0 |
June |
7.0 |
249.8 |
413.3 |
780.2 |
677.9 |
682.3 |
786.5 |
927.8 |
1,095.6 |
July |
30.0 |
326.4 |
|
847.9 |
613.9 |
|
877.9 |
940.3 |
|
August |
80.0 |
329.6 |
|
781.2 |
645.2 |
|
861.2 |
974.8 |
|
September |
112.7 |
327.6 |
|
718.1 |
615.4 |
|
830.8 |
943.0 |
|
October |
125.0 |
297.2 |
|
664.4 |
613.7 |
|
789.4 |
910.9 |
|
November |
134.7 |
267.9 |
|
682.0 |
667.1 |
|
816.7 |
935.0 |
|
December |
154.6 |
240.2 |
|
824.9 |
762.0 |
|
979.5 |
1,002.2 |
|
January |
183.2 |
326.3 |
|
767.5 |
717.1 |
|
950.7 |
1,043.4 |
|
February |
178.2 |
381.7 |
|
803.5 |
774.5 |
|
981.7 |
1,156.2 |
|
March |
144.6 |
329.5 |
321.2 |
1,058.2 |
986.5 |
764.5 |
1,202.8 |
1,316.0 |
1,085.8 |
Average |
95.9 |
276.8 |
|
789.2 |
721.2 |
|
885.1 |
998.0 |
|
VII.12 The Reserve Bank, on behalf of the state
governments, maintains the consolidated sinking
fund (CSF) that provides a cushion for amortisation
of market borrowing/liabilities of the states and the
guarantee redemption fund (GRF), which provides
for the servicing of contingent liability arising from
the invocation of guarantees issued in respect of
borrowings by state level undertakings or other
bodies. As on March 31, 2012, 20 state governments
had notified CSF and 10 states had set up GRF.
The outstanding investments under CSF and GRF
amounted to `431.4 billion and `41.2 billion,
respectively at end-June 2012.
VII.13 The challenge in 2012-13 would be to
manage the relatively higher budgeted market
borrowings of the central government as also the
expected elevated level of borrowings of the state
governments, with inflation persisting at a high
level and tight liquidity conditions. In an
environment of slowing growth and given the
limited options regarding debt management, it is
crucial that the fiscal deficit and its financing by way
of market borrowings does not escalate beyond the
budgeted level. |