Today, the Reserve Bank released the results of 37th round of its quarterly services and infrastructure outlook survey (SIOS) conducted during Q1:2023-24. This forward-looking survey1 captures qualitative assessment and expectations of Indian companies in the services and infrastructure sectors on a set of business parameters relating to demand conditions, price situation and other business conditions. In the latest round of the survey, 670 companies provided their assessment for Q1:2023-24 and expectations for Q2:2023-24 as well as outlook on key parameters for the subsequent two quarters. Highlights: A. Services Sector Assessment for Q1:2023-24 -
Services sector firms assessed continued improvement in the overall business situation during Q1:2023-24; though the level of optimism recorded some moderation from the previous quarter (Chart 1 and Table A). -
The sentiments on turnover improved further with nearly 60 per cent of the respondents reporting an increase (Table S2). -
Employment conditions remained positive with some moderation from the previous survey round. -
Pressures from input cost and wage bill witnessed some easing during the quarter. -
Respondents polled for lower optimism for both selling prices and profit margin. Expectations for Q2:2023-24 -
Service enterprises are optimistic about overall business situation as well as their turnover and employment situation in Q2:2023-24 (Chart 1 and Table A). -
Pressures from wage bill and cost of finance are expected to rise but input cost pressure is likely to be a shade lower vis-à-vis the previous quarter; rise in selling price may support profit margin. Expectations for Q3:2023-24 and Q4:2023-24 -
Service sector enterprises expect further improvement in demand conditions in the second half of the financial year (Table C). -
Input cost pressures are likely to continue with expectations on selling prices to rise in the ensuing quarters. B. Infrastructure Sector Assessment for Q1:2023-24 -
Infrastructure companies remained positive on the overall business situation as well as their turnover; though optimism waned marginally for overall business situation (Chart 2 and Table B). -
Respondents reported improvement in employment conditions with over 45 per cent of respondents reporting an increase in full-time and part-time employees (Tables I3 and I4). -
Infrastructure companies assessed some easing in input and wage cost pressures. -
Enterprises gauged lower growth in selling prices for Q1:2023-24 and significant moderation in the assessment of profit margin vis-à-vis the previous quarter. Expectations for Q2:2023-24 -
Demand parameters in the infrastructure sector are anticipated to improve during Q2:2023-24 (Chart 2 and Table B). -
The job landscape is also likely to improve in terms of both full-time and part-time employment. -
Higher cost pressures are expected to stem from wage cost and finance cost in Q2:2023-24; respondents expect to pass on the increase by increasing selling prices and remain optimistic on profit margins. Expectations for Q3:2023-24 and Q4:2023-24 -
Infrastructure companies remain highly upbeat on demand and employment conditions till Q4:2023-24 (Table D). -
Input cost pressures are likely to persist in near term and selling prices are expected to remain at elevated level. Summary of Net Responses2 on Survey Parameters | Table A: Services Sector | (per cent) | Parameters | Assessment period | Expectations period | Q4:2022-23 | Q1:2023-24 | Q1:2023-24 | Q2:2023-24 | Overall Business Situation | 49.5 | 42.0 | 55.8 | 56.0 | Turnover | 48.9 | 49.0 | 53.1 | 54.9 | Full-time Employees | 38.1 | 27.9 | 41.6 | 42.0 | Part-time Employees | 30.9 | 21.0 | 31.1 | 31.4 | Availability of Finance | 31.3 | 19.7 | 33.4 | 36.0 | Cost of Finance | -33.5 | -33.7 | -32.8 | -33.7 | Salary & Wages | -43.7 | -43.2 | -38.4 | -44.8 | Cost of Inputs | -37.2 | -35.7 | -41.1 | -40.9 | Selling Price | 30.9 | 17.4 | 31.3 | 32.7 | Profit Margin | 33.9 | 4.9 | 39.1 | 41.2 | Inventories | 34.2 | 19.6 | 34.8 | 34.8 | Technical/Service Capacity | 33.7 | 25.1 | 34.0 | 49.8 | Physical Investment | 30.0 | 20.7 | 30.3 | 41.5 | Table B: Infrastructure Sector | (per cent) | Parameters | Assessment period | Expectations period | Q4:2022-23 | Q1:2023-24 | Q1:2023-24 | Q2:2023-24 | Overall Business Situation | 50.4 | 48.4 | 55.3 | 56.0 | Turnover | 48.7 | 49.5 | 55.3 | 55.6 | Full-time Employees | 41.7 | 33.3 | 46.5 | 46.7 | Part-time Employees | 42.9 | 37.0 | 42.9 | 47.2 | Availability of Finance | 39.8 | 12.2 | 44.1 | 45.6 | Cost of Finance | -36.3 | -42.4 | -41.1 | -41.7 | Salary & Wages | -43.5 | -37.4 | -43.9 | -47.8 | Cost of Inputs | -44.2 | -43.2 | -47.8 | -46.6 | Selling Price | 42.3 | 22.0 | 40.7 | 41.0 | Profit Margin | 36.3 | 12.2 | 40.2 | 40.4 | Inventories | 43.4 | 15.0 | 46.4 | 33.3 | Technical/Service Capacity | 42.2 | 31.0 | 43.1 | 51.2 | Physical Investment | 42.2 | 27.1 | 40.2 | 33.8 | Expectations of Select Parameters for extended period – Net response | (in per cent) | Table C: Services Sector | Parameter | Round 36 | Round 37 | Q1:2023-24 | Q2:2023-24 | Q3:2023-24 | Q4:2023-24 | Overall Business Situation | 55.8 | 56.0 | 56.2 | 56.3 | Turnover | 53.1 | 54.9 | 55.4 | 57.4 | Full-time Employees | 41.6 | 42.0 | 43.6 | 43.2 | Part-time Employees | 31.1 | 31.4 | 42.5 | 44.4 | Cost of Inputs | -41.1 | -40.9 | -43.2 | -42.9 | Selling Price | 31.3 | 32.7 | 39.9 | 41.7 | Table D: Infrastructure Sector | Parameter | Round 36 | Round 37 | Q1:2023-24 | Q2:2023-24 | Q3:2023-24 | Q4:2023-24 | Overall Business Situation | 55.3 | 56.0 | 56.7 | 57.3 | Turnover | 55.3 | 55.6 | 55.7 | 56.2 | Full-time Employees | 46.5 | 46.7 | 46.1 | 48.9 | Part-time Employees | 42.9 | 47.2 | 47.2 | 49.1 | Cost of Inputs | -47.8 | -46.6 | -47.1 | -45.5 | Selling Price | 40.7 | 41.0 | 42.7 | 44.4 | Note: Please see the excel file for time series data. Services Sector Table S1: Assessment and Expectation for Overall Business Situation | (Percentage responses)@ | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Better | No Change | Worse | Net response# | Better | No Change | Worse | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 47.0 | 38.3 | 14.7 | 32.2 | 56.6 | 40.1 | 3.3 | 53.4 | Q2:22-23 | 45.9 | 48.7 | 5.4 | 40.5 | 59.6 | 36.7 | 3.7 | 55.9 | Q3:22-23 | 52.4 | 43.3 | 4.3 | 48.1 | 57.4 | 38.1 | 4.4 | 53.0 | Q4:22-23 | 59.8 | 30.0 | 10.3 | 49.5 | 55.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 50.1 | Q1:23-24 | 55.0 | 32.0 | 13.0 | 42.0 | 64.2 | 27.4 | 8.4 | 55.8 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 62.3 | 31.3 | 6.4 | 56.0 | ‘Increase’ in Overall business situation is optimistic. @: Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100. #: Net Response (NR) is the difference of percentage of the respondents reporting optimism and that reporting pessimism. The range is -100 to 100. Any value greater than zero indicates expansion/ optimism and any value less than zero indicates contraction/ pessimism. | Table S2: Assessment and Expectation for Turnover | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 43.1 | 37.7 | 19.2 | 23.9 | 55.5 | 40.2 | 4.3 | 51.1 | Q2:22-23 | 51.2 | 40.3 | 8.5 | 42.7 | 54.6 | 41.4 | 4.0 | 50.6 | Q3:22-23 | 49.2 | 45.2 | 5.5 | 43.7 | 61.6 | 34.0 | 4.4 | 57.1 | Q4:22-23 | 57.4 | 34.0 | 8.5 | 48.9 | 51.5 | 42.5 | 6.0 | 45.5 | Q1:23-24 | 59.4 | 30.2 | 10.4 | 49.0 | 60.0 | 33.1 | 6.9 | 53.1 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 59.3 | 36.3 | 4.4 | 54.9 | ‘Increase’ in Turnover is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S3: Assessment and Expectation for Full-time Employees | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 28.2 | 57.5 | 14.3 | 13.8 | 27.0 | 68.6 | 4.4 | 22.6 | Q2:22-23 | 35.6 | 57.7 | 6.7 | 28.9 | 29.1 | 67.8 | 3.1 | 26.0 | Q3:22-23 | 42.9 | 52.5 | 4.6 | 38.4 | 38.4 | 55.9 | 5.8 | 32.6 | Q4:22-23 | 45.1 | 48.0 | 7.0 | 38.1 | 47.1 | 48.0 | 4.8 | 42.3 | Q1:23-24 | 40.1 | 47.8 | 12.1 | 27.9 | 47.8 | 45.9 | 6.3 | 41.6 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 44.7 | 52.6 | 2.7 | 42.0 | ‘Increase’ in Full-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S4: Assessment and Expectation for Part-time Employees | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 25.2 | 65.9 | 8.9 | 16.3 | 25.0 | 67.8 | 7.2 | 17.8 | Q2:22-23 | 22.2 | 71.8 | 6.0 | 16.2 | 29.0 | 64.5 | 6.6 | 22.4 | Q3:22-23 | 40.1 | 54.8 | 5.1 | 34.9 | 27.8 | 67.3 | 5.0 | 22.8 | Q4:22-23 | 36.2 | 58.5 | 5.3 | 30.9 | 41.8 | 53.1 | 5.1 | 36.7 | Q1:23-24 | 30.9 | 59.1 | 9.9 | 21.0 | 35.3 | 60.6 | 4.2 | 31.1 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 36.7 | 57.9 | 5.3 | 31.4 | ‘Increase’ in Part-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S5: Assessment and Expectation for Availability of Finance | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Improve | No Change | Worsen | Net response | Improve | No Change | Worsen | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 28.5 | 54.9 | 16.5 | 12.0 | 33.5 | 61.3 | 5.2 | 28.2 | Q2:22-23 | 26.9 | 65.8 | 7.3 | 19.6 | 33.2 | 61.7 | 5.1 | 28.2 | Q3:22-23 | 42.1 | 53.4 | 4.6 | 37.5 | 32.9 | 61.0 | 6.2 | 26.7 | Q4:22-23 | 34.9 | 61.6 | 3.6 | 31.3 | 42.3 | 52.4 | 5.4 | 36.9 | Q1:23-24 | 29.3 | 61.2 | 9.5 | 19.7 | 36.0 | 61.4 | 2.6 | 33.4 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 39.5 | 57.0 | 3.5 | 36.0 | ‘Improve’ in Availability of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S6: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Finance | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 34.4 | 58.5 | 7.1 | -27.3 | 17.3 | 79.9 | 2.8 | -14.5 | Q2:22-23 | 35.1 | 59.5 | 5.4 | -29.7 | 31.5 | 66.0 | 2.5 | -29.1 | Q3:22-23 | 40.7 | 54.7 | 4.6 | -36.1 | 39.7 | 57.1 | 3.2 | -36.5 | Q4:22-23 | 36.7 | 60.1 | 3.2 | -33.5 | 41.6 | 53.2 | 5.2 | -36.5 | Q1:23-24 | 42.1 | 49.6 | 8.3 | -33.7 | 35.4 | 62.0 | 2.6 | -32.8 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 38.1 | 57.6 | 4.3 | -33.7 | ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S7: Assessment and Expectation for Salary/Wages | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 40.4 | 55.1 | 4.5 | -35.9 | 37.0 | 62.4 | 0.6 | -36.3 | Q2:22-23 | 46.1 | 51.0 | 2.9 | -43.3 | 28.4 | 70.5 | 1.1 | -27.3 | Q3:22-23 | 47.9 | 48.4 | 3.7 | -44.2 | 42.4 | 56.0 | 1.6 | -40.9 | Q4:22-23 | 47.6 | 48.4 | 3.9 | -43.7 | 43.3 | 52.1 | 4.6 | -38.7 | Q1:23-24 | 48.8 | 45.6 | 5.6 | -43.2 | 45.9 | 46.7 | 7.5 | -38.4 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 46.4 | 52.0 | 1.6 | -44.8 | ‘Decrease’ in Salary/Wages is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S8: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Inputs | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 67.0 | 29.9 | 3.2 | -63.8 | 61.0 | 36.6 | 2.3 | -58.7 | Q2:22-23 | 46.0 | 50.3 | 3.6 | -42.4 | 62.0 | 36.1 | 1.9 | -60.2 | Q3:22-23 | 46.1 | 49.2 | 4.7 | -41.4 | 49.4 | 45.6 | 4.9 | -44.5 | Q4:22-23 | 41.9 | 53.4 | 4.7 | -37.2 | 50.1 | 44.5 | 5.3 | -44.8 | Q1:23-24 | 45.2 | 45.4 | 9.5 | -35.7 | 43.8 | 53.6 | 2.7 | -41.1 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 47.0 | 46.8 | 6.1 | -40.9 | ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Inputs is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S9: Assessment and Expectation for Selling Price | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 31.9 | 60.1 | 8.0 | 23.9 | 29.5 | 65.9 | 4.6 | 24.9 | Q2:22-23 | 19.1 | 74.9 | 5.9 | 13.2 | 33.3 | 63.1 | 3.6 | 29.8 | Q3:22-23 | 40.8 | 54.4 | 4.8 | 36.0 | 25.7 | 68.3 | 6.1 | 19.6 | Q4:22-23 | 34.4 | 62.2 | 3.5 | 30.9 | 38.9 | 55.6 | 5.5 | 33.4 | Q1:23-24 | 28.8 | 59.8 | 11.4 | 17.4 | 35.7 | 60.0 | 4.3 | 31.3 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 39.5 | 53.7 | 6.8 | 32.7 | ‘Increase’ in Selling Price is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S10: Assessment and Expectation for Profit Margin | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 19.0 | 49.3 | 31.7 | -12.7 | 28.9 | 61.3 | 9.8 | 19.1 | Q2:22-23 | 21.9 | 58.3 | 19.9 | 2.0 | 30.1 | 58.1 | 11.8 | 18.3 | Q3:22-23 | 41.9 | 52.0 | 6.1 | 35.8 | 36.3 | 54.3 | 9.5 | 26.8 | Q4:22-23 | 43.6 | 46.7 | 9.7 | 33.9 | 44.8 | 49.7 | 5.4 | 39.4 | Q1:23-24 | 26.3 | 52.3 | 21.4 | 4.9 | 48.4 | 42.3 | 9.3 | 39.1 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 50.3 | 40.6 | 9.1 | 41.2 | ‘Increase’ in Profit Margin is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S11: Assessment and Expectation for Inventories | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 25.4 | 66.7 | 8.0 | 17.4 | 22.9 | 72.5 | 4.7 | 18.2 | Q2:22-23 | 33.7 | 62.7 | 3.6 | 30.1 | 27.5 | 68.9 | 3.6 | 24.0 | Q3:22-23 | 48.3 | 46.9 | 4.8 | 43.5 | 40.5 | 56.8 | 2.7 | 37.8 | Q4:22-23 | 38.1 | 58.1 | 3.8 | 34.2 | 48.8 | 46.0 | 5.2 | 43.5 | Q1:23-24 | 30.4 | 58.8 | 10.8 | 19.6 | 38.6 | 57.7 | 3.7 | 34.8 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 40.3 | 54.3 | 5.4 | 34.8 | ‘Increase’ in Inventories is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S12: Assessment and Expectation for Technical/Service Capacity | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 25.8 | 71.9 | 2.3 | 23.5 | 31.3 | 66.9 | 1.8 | 29.4 | Q2:22-23 | 24.0 | 73.8 | 2.2 | 21.8 | 33.9 | 63.8 | 2.3 | 31.7 | Q3:22-23 | 41.7 | 53.6 | 4.7 | 37.1 | 29.5 | 68.8 | 1.7 | 27.7 | Q4:22-23 | 36.4 | 60.9 | 2.7 | 33.7 | 41.5 | 53.9 | 4.6 | 37.0 | Q1:23-24 | 30.0 | 65.1 | 4.9 | 25.1 | 36.4 | 61.1 | 2.5 | 34.0 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 51.2 | 47.5 | 1.3 | 49.8 | ‘Increase’ in Technical/Service Capacity is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table S13: Assessment and Expectation for Physical Investment | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 25.0 | 72.5 | 2.5 | 22.5 | 27.7 | 69.9 | 2.4 | 25.3 | Q2:22-23 | 21.4 | 76.7 | 2.0 | 19.4 | 32.5 | 66.5 | 1.0 | 31.5 | Q3:22-23 | 41.3 | 54.4 | 4.3 | 37.0 | 22.8 | 75.8 | 1.5 | 21.3 | Q4:22-23 | 32.2 | 65.5 | 2.3 | 30.0 | 41.4 | 53.9 | 4.7 | 36.7 | Q1:23-24 | 26.9 | 66.8 | 6.3 | 20.7 | 33.0 | 64.3 | 2.7 | 30.3 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 43.4 | 54.8 | 1.8 | 41.5 | ‘Increase’ in Physical Investment is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Infrastructure Sector Table I1: Assessment and Expectation for Overall Business Situation | (Percentage responses)@ | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Better | No Change | Worse | Net response# | Better | No Change | Worse | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 46.9 | 26.9 | 26.2 | 20.8 | 59.3 | 34.6 | 6.2 | 53.1 | Q2:22-23 | 41.9 | 46.8 | 11.3 | 30.6 | 53.1 | 36.9 | 10.0 | 43.1 | Q3:22-23 | 55.5 | 38.0 | 6.5 | 49.0 | 49.2 | 46.7 | 4.1 | 45.1 | Q4:22-23 | 60.9 | 28.7 | 10.4 | 50.4 | 56.8 | 37.2 | 6.0 | 50.9 | Q1:23-24 | 62.6 | 23.1 | 14.3 | 48.4 | 60.5 | 34.2 | 5.3 | 55.3 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 62.6 | 30.8 | 6.6 | 56.0 | ‘Increase’ in Overall business situation is optimistic. @: Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100. #: Net Response (NR) is the difference of percentage of the respondents reporting optimism and that reporting pessimism. The range is -100 to 100. Any value greater than zero indicates expansion/ optimism and any value less than zero indicates contraction/ pessimism. | Table I2: Assessment and Expectation for Turnover | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 37.2 | 30.2 | 32.6 | 4.7 | 51.3 | 37.5 | 11.3 | 40.0 | Q2:22-23 | 45.5 | 40.7 | 13.8 | 31.7 | 43.0 | 46.1 | 10.9 | 32.0 | Q3:22-23 | 52.6 | 40.2 | 7.2 | 45.4 | 56.1 | 35.0 | 8.9 | 47.2 | Q4:22-23 | 60.9 | 27.0 | 12.2 | 48.7 | 55.8 | 37.2 | 7.0 | 48.8 | Q1:23-24 | 64.8 | 19.8 | 15.4 | 49.5 | 61.4 | 32.5 | 6.1 | 55.3 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 61.1 | 33.3 | 5.6 | 55.6 | ‘Increase’ in Turnover is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I3: Assessment and Expectation for Full-time Employees | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 22.7 | 62.5 | 14.8 | 7.8 | 23.1 | 71.8 | 5.1 | 17.9 | Q2:22-23 | 31.5 | 60.5 | 8.1 | 23.4 | 20.6 | 74.6 | 4.8 | 15.9 | Q3:22-23 | 51.2 | 42.3 | 6.5 | 44.7 | 36.4 | 57.0 | 6.6 | 29.8 | Q4:22-23 | 47.0 | 47.8 | 5.2 | 41.7 | 52.4 | 40.7 | 6.9 | 45.5 | Q1:23-24 | 46.7 | 40.0 | 13.3 | 33.3 | 50.9 | 44.7 | 4.4 | 46.5 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 48.9 | 48.9 | 2.2 | 46.7 | ‘Increase’ in Full-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I4: Assessment and Expectation for Part-time Employees | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 17.2 | 75.9 | 6.9 | 10.3 | 20.5 | 75.0 | 4.5 | 15.9 | Q2:22-23 | 19.7 | 71.3 | 9.0 | 10.7 | 21.8 | 72.7 | 5.5 | 16.4 | Q3:22-23 | 50.3 | 43.2 | 6.5 | 43.8 | 24.6 | 68.6 | 6.8 | 17.8 | Q4:22-23 | 46.4 | 50.0 | 3.6 | 42.9 | 52.1 | 41.7 | 6.2 | 45.9 | Q1:23-24 | 48.1 | 40.7 | 11.1 | 37.0 | 43.8 | 55.4 | 0.9 | 42.9 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 50.9 | 45.3 | 3.8 | 47.2 | ‘Increase’ in Part-time Employees is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I5: Assessment and Expectation for Availability of Finance | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Improve | No Change | Worsen | Net response | Improve | No Change | Worsen | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 29.5 | 49.6 | 20.9 | 8.5 | 28.8 | 67.5 | 3.8 | 25.0 | Q2:22-23 | 30.9 | 60.2 | 8.9 | 22.0 | 33.9 | 59.8 | 6.3 | 27.6 | Q3:22-23 | 50.5 | 43.7 | 5.8 | 44.7 | 43.4 | 50.8 | 5.7 | 37.7 | Q4:22-23 | 45.1 | 49.6 | 5.3 | 39.8 | 52.2 | 41.9 | 5.8 | 46.4 | Q1:23-24 | 28.9 | 54.4 | 16.7 | 12.2 | 46.8 | 50.5 | 2.7 | 44.1 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 51.1 | 43.3 | 5.6 | 45.6 | ‘Improve’ in Availability of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I6: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Finance | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 43.0 | 51.2 | 5.8 | -37.2 | 26.8 | 71.8 | 1.4 | -25.4 | Q2:22-23 | 43.8 | 48.8 | 7.4 | -36.4 | 39.8 | 58.5 | 1.7 | -38.1 | Q3:22-23 | 51.0 | 42.8 | 6.2 | -44.9 | 47.5 | 46.7 | 5.8 | -41.7 | Q4:22-23 | 43.4 | 49.6 | 7.1 | -36.3 | 49.7 | 44.5 | 5.8 | -43.8 | Q1:23-24 | 50.6 | 41.2 | 8.2 | -42.4 | 43.8 | 53.6 | 2.7 | -41.1 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 44.0 | 53.6 | 2.4 | -41.7 | ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Finance is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I7: Assessment and Expectation for Salary/Wages | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 38.5 | 55.4 | 6.2 | -32.3 | 38.8 | 60.0 | 1.3 | -37.5 | Q2:22-23 | 31.1 | 64.8 | 4.1 | -27.0 | 20.8 | 76.9 | 2.3 | -18.5 | Q3:22-23 | 56.3 | 39.2 | 4.4 | -51.9 | 35.0 | 62.4 | 2.6 | -32.5 | Q4:22-23 | 47.0 | 49.6 | 3.5 | -43.5 | 50.5 | 43.6 | 5.8 | -44.7 | Q1:23-24 | 40.7 | 56.0 | 3.3 | -37.4 | 46.5 | 50.9 | 2.6 | -43.9 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 47.8 | 52.2 | 0.0 | -47.8 | ‘Decrease’ in Salary/Wages is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I8: Assessment and Expectation for Cost of Inputs | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 79.5 | 19.7 | 0.8 | -78.7 | 80.3 | 18.3 | 1.4 | -78.9 | Q2:22-23 | 50.0 | 44.2 | 5.8 | -44.2 | 76.0 | 23.1 | 0.8 | -75.2 | Q3:22-23 | 52.2 | 41.6 | 6.2 | -46.0 | 53.0 | 42.7 | 4.3 | -48.7 | Q4:22-23 | 46.9 | 50.4 | 2.7 | -44.2 | 55.3 | 37.8 | 6.9 | -48.5 | Q1:23-24 | 47.7 | 47.7 | 4.5 | -43.2 | 49.6 | 48.7 | 1.8 | -47.8 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 51.1 | 44.3 | 4.5 | -46.6 | ‘Decrease’ in Cost of Inputs is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I9: Assessment and Expectation for Selling Price | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 32.2 | 54.0 | 13.8 | 18.4 | 25.0 | 73.2 | 1.8 | 23.2 | Q2:22-23 | 27.5 | 60.0 | 12.5 | 15.0 | 34.1 | 62.4 | 3.5 | 30.6 | Q3:22-23 | 51.4 | 41.8 | 6.8 | 44.5 | 32.2 | 62.6 | 5.2 | 27.0 | Q4:22-23 | 46.8 | 48.6 | 4.5 | 42.3 | 50.3 | 43.1 | 6.6 | 43.8 | Q1:23-24 | 29.3 | 63.4 | 7.3 | 22.0 | 43.5 | 53.7 | 2.8 | 40.7 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 43.4 | 54.2 | 2.4 | 41.0 | ‘Increase’ in Selling Price is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I10: Assessment and Expectation for Profit Margin | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 13.8 | 34.6 | 51.5 | -37.7 | 27.8 | 57.0 | 15.2 | 12.7 | Q2:22-23 | 22.0 | 54.5 | 23.6 | -1.6 | 22.5 | 62.0 | 15.5 | 7.0 | Q3:22-23 | 52.2 | 40.1 | 7.6 | 44.6 | 34.7 | 47.1 | 18.2 | 16.5 | Q4:22-23 | 46.0 | 44.2 | 9.7 | 36.3 | 52.8 | 39.6 | 7.6 | 45.1 | Q1:23-24 | 36.7 | 38.9 | 24.4 | 12.2 | 47.3 | 45.5 | 7.1 | 40.2 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 46.1 | 48.3 | 5.6 | 40.4 | ‘Increase’ in Profit Margin is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I11: Assessment and Expectation for Inventories | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 20.9 | 70.1 | 9.0 | 11.9 | 24.4 | 71.1 | 4.4 | 20.0 | Q2:22-23 | 36.4 | 55.9 | 7.6 | 28.8 | 25.8 | 71.2 | 3.0 | 22.7 | Q3:22-23 | 52.4 | 41.0 | 6.6 | 45.9 | 45.8 | 47.5 | 6.8 | 39.0 | Q4:22-23 | 48.7 | 46.0 | 5.3 | 43.4 | 53.6 | 39.2 | 7.2 | 46.4 | Q1:23-24 | 28.3 | 58.3 | 13.3 | 15.0 | 48.2 | 50.0 | 1.8 | 46.4 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 36.7 | 60.0 | 3.3 | 33.3 | ‘Increase’ in Inventories is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I12: Assessment and Expectation for Technical/Service Capacity | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 23.5 | 73.5 | 2.9 | 20.6 | 32.1 | 64.3 | 3.6 | 28.6 | Q2:22-23 | 25.5 | 68.2 | 6.4 | 19.1 | 29.4 | 67.6 | 2.9 | 26.5 | Q3:22-23 | 50.2 | 43.9 | 6.0 | 44.2 | 27.7 | 70.5 | 1.8 | 25.9 | Q4:22-23 | 45.9 | 50.5 | 3.7 | 42.2 | 50.5 | 43.5 | 6.0 | 44.6 | Q1:23-24 | 35.7 | 59.5 | 4.8 | 31.0 | 45.0 | 53.2 | 1.8 | 43.1 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 51.2 | 48.8 | 0.0 | 51.2 | ‘Increase’ in Technical/Service Capacity is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. | Table I13: Assessment and Expectation for Physical Investment | (Percentage responses) | Quarter | Assessment | Expectation | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Increase | No Change | Decrease | Net response | Q1:22-23 | 27.0 | 67.6 | 5.4 | 21.6 | 24.1 | 69.0 | 6.9 | 17.2 | Q2:22-23 | 22.0 | 72.5 | 5.5 | 16.5 | 38.9 | 58.3 | 2.8 | 36.1 | Q3:22-23 | 49.7 | 44.1 | 6.3 | 43.4 | 26.9 | 70.4 | 2.8 | 24.1 | Q4:22-23 | 45.9 | 50.5 | 3.7 | 42.2 | 49.8 | 43.6 | 6.6 | 43.2 | Q1:23-24 | 37.1 | 52.9 | 10.0 | 27.1 | 43.9 | 52.3 | 3.7 | 40.2 | Q2:23-24 | | | | | 36.8 | 60.3 | 2.9 | 33.8 | ‘Increase’ in Physical Investment is optimistic. Footnotes @ and # given in Table 1 are applicable here. |
|