IV. CREDIT DELIVERY AND FINANCIAL INCLUSION
Financial inclusion is an important process to attain the goal of inclusive growth. Accordingly, the Reserve Bank of
India has made sustained efforts to increase the penetration of formal financial services in unbanked areas, while
continuing with its policy of ensuring adequate but viable flow of credit to priority sectors of the economy. Financial
literacy efforts of the Reserve Bank, particularly the outreach programme, generated significant interest and exuberant
participation from public and banks/ financial institutions. Regulatory actions to further financial inclusion included
changes in KYC norms, relaxing branch authorization policy, widening eligible entities to function as business
correspondents, and requiring minimum percentage of additional branches to be opened in unbanked rural centres.
IV.1 Credit delivery in a country as diverse as India
poses many a challenge including bringing those
sections of society that are financially excluded into
the ambit of formal financial system, providing
financial literacy, reforming credit delivery
mechanisms, among others. The Reserve Bank of
India continued with its various initiatives in this area
such as rolling out the Financial Inclusion Plans (FIP),
encouraging multiple channels of lending and
enhancing the scope of the Business Correspondent
(BC) model, improving credit delivery procedures in
micro and small enterprises (MSE) sectors and
encouraging adoption of Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) solutions.
PRIORITY SECTOR LENDING
IV.2 The focus of priority sector lending is to
enhance credit facilities for those priority sectors that
impact large sections of the population, the weaker
sections and the sectors which are employment
intensive such as agriculture and micro and small
enterprise (MSE). As on the last reporting Friday of
March 2011, 15 out of 81 banks had not achieved the
priority sector lending target (Table IV.1).
IV.3 Scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) having
shortfall in lending to priority sector/subsectors vis-avis
the stipulated targets, will be required to contribute
to the corpus of Rural Infrastructure Development
Fund (RIDF) and similar funds set up with National
Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development
(NABARD) / Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) / National Housing Bank (NHB). The
corpus of such funds are announced every year by
the Government of India.
IV.4 The Union Budget 2011-12 announced to set
up RIDF XVII (corpus of `18,000 crore of which `2,000
crore will be dedicated to creation of warehousing
facilities), Short Term Co-operative Rural Credit
(STCRC) (Refinance) Fund (corpus of `10,000 crore),
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME)
(Refinance) Fund (corpus of `5,000 crore), and Rural
Housing Fund (corpus of `3,000 crore) with NABARD,
SIDBI, NHB, respectively during the year.
Flow of Credit to Agriculture Sector
IV.5 The Government had announced a target of
`3,75,000 crore for flow of agricultural credit in 2010- 11, of which 119 per cent had been achieved by end-
March, 2011(provisional) by banks including cooperative
banks and regional rural banks (RRBs). The
target for the year 2011-12 is `4,75,000 crore for
disbursement to agriculture by all agencies. Banks
have been advised to step up direct lending to
agriculture and credit to small and marginal farmers.
Table IV.1: Priority Sector Advances |
(Amount in ` crore) |
|
Public Sector Banks |
Private Sector Banks |
Foreign Banks |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2010* |
8,63,777 |
2,14,669 |
59,960 |
|
(41.6) |
(45.8) |
(36.0) |
2011* |
10,22,925 |
2,49,139 |
66,796 |
|
(41.0) |
(46.7) |
(39.1) |
Notes: 1.* : As on the Last Reporting Friday of March.
2. Figures in brackets are percentages to ANBC or credit
equivalent of OBE, whichever are higher as on March
31 of the previous year, in the respective groups.
3. The target for aggregate advances to the priority sector
is 40 per cent of the ANBC or credit equivalent of OBE,
whichever is higher for domestic banks and 32 per cent
for the foreign banks.
4. Data for 2011 are provisional.
Source: Provisional data reported by banks. |
Table IV.2: Disbursements under SACP by
Public Sector Banks |
(Amount in ` crore) |
Year |
Target |
Achieve ment |
Percentage of Achieve ment |
Annual growth
in Disburse ment
(%) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2007-08 |
1,52,133 |
1,33,226 |
87.6 |
8.8 |
2008-09 |
1,59,470 |
1,65,198 |
103.3 |
24.0 |
2009-10 |
2,04,460 |
2,07,347 |
101.4 |
26.0 |
2010-11* |
2,29,709 |
2,05,367 |
89.4 |
-0.95 |
*: Data are provisional. |
IV.6 The disbursements by the public sector banks
to agriculture under Special Agricultural Credit Plan
(SACP) for the financial year 2009-10 was at
`2,07,347 crore against that of `2,04,460 crore last
year (101.4 per cent of the projected amount) whilst
that of the private sector banks was a disbursal of
`78,452 crore against the projection of `62,352 crore
(126 per cent of the projected amount). Disbursements
by the public sector banks under SACP for the last
three years are as set out in Table IV.2.
IV.7 Recovery rate for direct agricultural advances
for the year ended 2010 showed moderate decline
as compared to the rise seen in the previous year
(Table IV.3).
IV.8 For the year 2010-11, the Government
lowered the rate of interest subvention for short-term production credit up to `3 lakh to 1.5 per cent while
the additional interest subvention for prompt paying
farmers was raised to 2 per cent; accordingly the
effective interest rate charged to such farmers is likely
to come down to 5 per cent per annum.
Table IV.3: Recovery of Direct Agricultural Advances |
(Amount in ` crore) |
Year ended June |
Demand |
Recovery |
Overdues |
Percentage of recovery to demand |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2008 |
95,100 |
71,739 |
23,361 |
75.4 |
2009 |
1,19,084 |
90,660 |
28,425 |
76.1 |
2010* |
92,905 |
68,665 |
24,240 |
73.9 |
*: Data are provisional. |
IV.9 As per the reimbursement schedule for
Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme,
the Government of India released the 3rd instalment
of `11,340 crore in January 2011 of which `1,240 crore
was passed on to NABARD for reimbursement to
RRBs and co-operatives and the remainder
amount (`10,100 crore) was utilised for reimbursing
SCBs, local area banks (LABs) and urban cooperative
banks (UCBs) (Table IV.4).
Table IV.4: Compensation of lending institutions under Agricultural Debt Waiver and
Debt
Relief Scheme, 2008 |
(Amount in ` crore) |
Lending Institutions |
Proposed Reimbursement* |
1st instalment Sep-08 |
2nd instalment Jul-09 |
3rd instalment Jul-10 |
4th instalment Jul-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
RRBs and Co-operatives |
17,500 |
10,500 |
2,800 |
Balance amount, if any |
SCBs, UCBs and LABs |
7,500 |
4,500 |
9,200 |
Balance amount, if any |
Total |
25,000 |
15,000 |
12,000 |
Balance amount |
*: Based on the current provisional estimates. |
Flow of Credit to Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises (MSMEs)
IV.10 In order to study various issues relating to
MSMEs, a High Level Task Force was constituted by
the Government of India (Chairman: Shri T K A Nair,
Principal Secretary to the Prime Minster). SCBs were
accordingly advised in June, 2010 to increase their
share of lending to micro enterprises in MSE to 60 per cent in three stages (viz., 50 per cent in the year
2010-11, 55 per cent and 60 per cent in the
subsequent years) with 10 per cent annual growth in
the number of micro enterprise accounts and also 20
per cent year-on-year growth in MSE lending. A
suitable format has been devised by the Reserve
Bank to capture and closely monitor the achievement
of these targets by banks on a half yearly basis i.e.,
in March and September.
IV.11 The Union Budget 2011-12 proposed to
liberalise the existing scheme of interest subvention
of 1 per cent on housing loans by extending it up to
`15 lakh where the cost of the house does not exceed
`25 lakh from the present limit of `10 lakh and `20
lakh, respectively. Accordingly, necessary instructions
were issued to all SCBs (excluding RRBs) on April
21, 2011.
IV.12 Reflecting the revival in demand conditions
in 2010-11, the total credit to MSE from the SCBs
increased by 33.7 per cent during the year (Table IV.5).
IV.13 Based on the recommendations of the Task
Force on Revival of Rural Co-operative Credit
Institutions (Chairman: Prof. A. Vaidyanathan) the
Government of India ,in consultation with State
Governments, had approved a package for revival of
the short-term rural cooperative credit structure (ST
CCS), consisting of Primary Agricultural Credit
Societies (PACS) at the village/base level, central cooperative
banks (CCBs) at the intermediate level and
the state co-operative banks (StCBs) at the apex level.
Aside from aiming at reviving the ST CCS to make it
an efficient medium to serve the credit needs of rural
India, especially the small and marginal farmers, the package also seeks to (i) provide financial assistance
to bring the system to an acceptable level of health;
(ii) introduce legal and institutional reforms necessary
for its democratic, self reliant and efficient functioning;
and (iii) take measures to improve the quality of
management.
Table IV.5: Credit to MSE Sector by SCBs |
|
Outstanding credit to MSE |
MSE/SSI credit as per cent of ANBC |
No. of Accounts (in Million) |
Amount
(in ` crore) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2010 |
8.5 |
3,62,291 |
13.4 |
|
|
(41.4) |
|
2011* |
9.3 |
4,84,473 |
9.9 |
|
|
(33.7) |
|
*: As on the Last Reporting Friday of March.
Note: 1. Figures in parantheses indicate per cent growth in credit over the previous year.
2. Data for 2011 are provisional. |
IV.14 The twenty-five states willing to participate
were required to enter into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) with the Central Government
and NABARD. This covers more than 96 per cent of
the ST CCS units in the country. Also, twenty one
states have amended their respective State
Cooperative Societies Act through legislative process.
IV.15 An aggregate amount of `8,993 crore has
been released by NABARD (up to end-June, 2011)
towards Government of India’s share for
recapitalisation of PACS in 16 states while the State
Governments have also released their share of `854
crore. The implementation of the revival package on
an all India basis is supervised by the National
Implementing and Monitoring Committee, set up by
the Government of India.
IV.16 The Reserve Bank regulates StCBs and
district central co-operative banks (DCCBs) under the
Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS), while the
NABARD supervises them. Subsequent to the
issuance of revised guidelines (in consultation with
NABARD) in October 2009 on licensing of StCBs/
DCCBs, 10 StCBs and 160 DCCBs have been
licensed taking the total number of licensed StCBs
and DCCBs to 24 and 235 respectively, as at end-
June, 2011.
IV.17 With a view to liberalizing the branch licensing
for RRBs, they were allowed to open branches in Tier
3 to Tier 6 centres as identified in the Census 2001
(with population up to 49,999), without having the
need to take permission from the Reserve Bank in
each case, subject to reporting, provided they fulfill
certain conditions. Accordingly, instructions were
issued to all RRBs and their sponsor banks in
November 2010.
IV.18 The Working Group of Technology
Upgradation in RRBs (Chairman: Shri G.Srinivasan) had recommended that Core Banking Solution (CBS)
should be fully implemented in all RRBs by September
2011. As on date, CBS has been fully implemented
in 45 out of the total 82 RRBs, while it is in progress
in the remainder.
FINANCIAL INCLUSION
IV.19 Financial inclusion broadly refers to the
process of ensuring access to appropriate financial
products and services needed by vulnerable groups
such as the weaker sections and low income groups
at an affordable cost, in a fair and transparent manner
by mainstream institutional players. Despite widespread expansion of the banking sector, a
significant proportion of the households, especially
in rural areas, remain outside the coverage of the
formal banking system. The proportion of rural
residents who lack access to bank accounts is about
40 per cent, and this rises to over three-fifths in the
eastern and north-eastern regions of India.
IV.20 Moving towards universal financial inclusion
has been a policy priority for the Reserve Bank over
the last few years since financial inclusion becomes
a critical financial component for ensuring sustainable
and equitable economic growth (Box IV.1).
Box IV.1
Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Growth: What the Empirical Evidence Suggests?
Inclusive growth as a strategy of economic development has
received renewed attention in recent years owing to rising
concerns that the benefits of economic growth have not been
equitably shared. Growth is inclusive when there is equality
of economic opportunities. Financial inclusion makes growth
broad based and sustainable by progressively encompassing
the hitherto excluded population. Financial inclusion is no
longer a policy choice but a policy compulsion.
Banks and other financial services players are expected to
mitigate the supply side bottlenecks that hinder the poor and
disadvantaged social groups from gaining access to the
financial system. Empirical evidence suggests that access
to financial products is constrained by several factors which
include: lack of awareness about the financial products,
unaffordable products, high transaction costs, and products
which are inconvenient, inflexible, not customised and of low
quality. Microfinance and financial literacy play pivotal roles
in addressing these issues.
Empirical evidence shows that countries with large proportion
of population excluded from the formal financial system also
show higher poverty ratios and higher inequality. The
inclusive growth country analytics has a distinct character
focusing on the pace and pattern of growth. Rapid pace of
growth is unquestionably necessary for substantial poverty
reduction, but for this growth to be sustainable in the long
run, it should be broad-based across sectors, and include a
large part of the country’s labour force. This analytics of
inclusive growth implies a direct link between the macro and
micro determinants of growth.
The main instrument for a sustainable and inclusive growth
is productive employment. Against this backdrop, studies
based on application of the Tobit model on national-level
cross-sectional household data for 2001 on the Indian
economy show a highly significant positive relationship
between productive loan amount and households poverty
after controlling for socio-economic characteristics. Panel data studies of Bangladesh observe that access to
microfinance contributes to poverty reduction, especially for
female participants. Cross country studies on factors
associated with financial inclusion show that the level of
human development and that of financial inclusion are
positively correlated, barring a few exceptions.
Some of the important factors determining the level of
financial inclusion in a country are per capita GDP, income
inequality, adult literacy and urbanisation. Further, physical
and electronic connectivity and information availability such
as telephone and internet usage also play positive role in
enhancing financial inclusion.
The estimated values of a Financial Inclusion Index, by
Mehrotra et al (2009) at the state and district levels for India,
indicate that there has been a relative improvement in the
status of financial inclusion between 2002 and 2006 with the
number of districts in the lowest grade declining from 378 to
330.
The empirical findings strengthen the argument that financial
exclusion is indeed a reflection of social exclusion, as
countries having low GDP per capita, relatively higher levels
of income inequality, low rates of literacy, low urbanisation
and poor connectivity appear to be less financially inclusive.
Financial inclusion, therefore, assumes importance as a
policy objective.
References:
Chakrabarty, K. C. (2010), ‘‘Inclusive Growth – Role of
Financial Sector’’, Speech at the National Finance Conclave
2010.
Ianchovichina, E. and S. Lundstrom (2009), ‘‘Inclusive Growth
Analytics: Framework and Application’’, World Bank Policy
Research Working Paper No. 4851.
Mehrotra,N, V.Puhazhendhi, G.G.Nair, and B.B.Sahoo (2009),
“Financial Inclusion – An Overview”, NABARD Occasional
Paper No. 48.
Instruments used for strengthening delivery of
services and assessment of their effectiveness
IV.21 Financial inclusion can be seen as a viable
business proposition for banks, especially so if the
delivery models aim at generating revenue rather than
being cost centric such that customers get quality
banking services at their door step while simultaneously
creating business opportunities for the banks.
IV.22 It is feasible only if delivery of services, at the
minimum, includes four products: (i) a savings cum
overdraft account, (ii) a remittance product for
electronic benefits transfer and other remittances, (iii)
a pure savings product ideally a recurring deposit
scheme, and (iv) entrepreneurial credit in the form of
General-purpose Credit Card (GCC) or Kisan Credit
Card (KCC).
IV.23 Reserve Bank is furthering financial inclusion
with high priority through a combination of strategies
ranging from relaxation of regulatory guidelines,
provision of new products and other supportive
measures to achieve sustainable and scalable
financial inclusion as outlined below.
A. Provision of new products
i) As of March 2011, 74.4 million No Frill
accounts have been opened by domestic
commercial banks with outstanding balance
of `6,566 crore. Basic banking No Frill
accounts have nil or very low minimum
balances as well as charges that make such
accounts accessible to vast sections of the
population.
ii) With a view to encourage transactions in No
Frill accounts banks have been advised to
provide small overdrafts (ODs) in such
accounts. Up to end March 2011, banks have
provided 4.2 million ODs amounting to `199
crore.
iii) Banks had been asked to consider
introduction of a GCC facility up to `25,000 at
their rural and semi-urban braches. The
objective of the scheme is to provide hasslefree
credit to banks’ customers based on the
assessment of cash flow without insistence on security, purpose or end-use of the credit.
This is in the nature of revolving credit entitling
the holder to withdraw up to the limit
sanctioned. As of March 2011, banks had 0.95
million GCC accounts with outstanding credit
of `1,308 crore.
iv) Banks have been advised to speed up
opening of accounts, leveraging ICT to provide
benefits to their customers at their door step.
As on March 2011, banks had opened 37.2
million accounts using ICT through BCs.
B. Regulatory measures
i) KYC requirements for opening bank accounts
have been further relaxed during the year, to
include job card issued by MGNREGA duly
signed by an officer of the State Government
or the letters issued by the Unique Identification
Authority of India containing details of name,
address and Aadhaar number.
ii) Simplified branch authorisation: To address
the issue of uneven spread of bank branches,
domestic SCBs are permitted, since
December 2009, to freely open branches in
Tier 3 to Tier 6 centres with population of less
than 50,000 under general permission, subject
to reporting. In the north eastern states and
Sikkim, domestic SCBs can now open
branches in rural, semi urban and urban
centres without taking prior permission from
the Reserve Bank, subject to reporting.
iii) Engaging Business Correspondents: During
2010-11, ‘for-profit’ companies were also
allowed to be engaged as BC - intermediaries
for providing financial and banking services,
as facilitators for banks. As at end-March,
2011, domestic commercial banks have
reported deploying 58,361 BCs/ customer
service providers (CSPs), providing banking
services in 76,801 villages.
iv) Opening of branches in unbanked rural
centres: So as to improve banking penetration
and financial inclusion rapidly in the rural
areas, the need for opening more brick and
mortar branches, besides using BCs, was felt. Accordingly, banks were mandated in the
Annual Policy Statement of May 2011 to
allocate at least 25 per cent of the total number
of branches to be opened during a year to
unbanked rural centres.
C. Supportive measures
i) Two Funds, namely the Financial Inclusion
Fund (FIF) for meeting the cost of
developmental and promotional interventions
for ensuring financial inclusion, and the
Financial Inclusion Technology Fund (FITF),
to meet the cost of technology adoption has
been set up at NABARD with an overall corpus
of `500 crore each. In the Union Budget for
2011-12 the corpus of these funds was
enhanced by `100 crore each.
ii) To improve banking penetration in the North-
East, the Reserve Bank has offered to fund
the capital and running costs for five years,
provided the State Government concerned is
willing to make available the premises and put
in place appropriate security arrangements.
During the year, branches were opened at 2
of the agreed centres in Meghalaya, 2 in
Tripura and 4 in Manipur.
iii) With an objective of ensuring uniform progress
in provision of banking services in all parts of
the country, banks were advised to draw up a
roadmap to provide banking services through
a banking outlet in every unbanked village
having a population of over 2,000 by March
2012. The Reserve Bank advised banks that
such banking services need not necessarily
be extended through a brick and mortar
branch but could be provided also through any
of the various forms of ICT- based models,
including BCs. About 72,800 such unbanked
villages have been identified and allotted to
various banks through State Level Bankers
Committees (SLBCs).
Progress of Financial Inclusion Plans during
the year
IV.24 In January 2010, all public and private sector
banks were advised to put in place a Board approved three-year FIP and submit the same to the Reserve
Bank by March 2010. Accordingly, the banks have
submitted their FIPs containing targets for March
2011, 2012 and 2013.
IV.25 These plans broadly include self-set targets
with respect to opening of rural brick and mortar
branches; employment of BCs; coverage of unbanked
villages with population above 2,000 as also other
unbanked villages with population below 2,000
through branches/BCs/other modes; opening of No
Frill accounts including those opened through BCICT;
issuance of KCC, GCC and other specific
products designed by them to cater to the financially
excluded segments. Banks were advised to integrate
Board approved FIPs with their business plans and
to include the criteria on financial inclusion as a
parameter in the performance evaluation of their staff.
IV.26 In order to review the progress of banks in the
implementation of FIPs and making way for
accelerated progress in future, the Reserve Bank has
been conducting Annual FIP Review Meetings with
banks. A few important action points from the
discussions held during May-June 2011 are as follows:
i) Banks would review their delivery models so
that financial inclusion results in a profitable
business for them.
ii) Banks will also focus on providing banking
services in peripheral villages with population
of less than 2,000.
iii) In future, banks would focus more on opening
of brick and mortar branches in unbanked
villages. It may be a low cost intermediary
kiosk with a simple structure, requiring
minimum infrastructure for operating small
customer transactions and supporting up to
8-10 BCs at a reasonable distance of 2-3 Kms.
iv) Banks would expand financial inclusion
initiatives in urban and semi-urban areas by
targeting pockets of migrant workers and small
vendors, leveraging Aadhaar enrollment for
opening banks accounts.
v) PSBs shall formulate FIPs for all RRBs
sponsored by them and develop an effective monitoring mechanism so that targets
assigned to the RRBs are achieved
meticulously.
Financial literacy efforts including outreach
activities
IV.27 Financial literacy facilitates financial inclusion,
which in turn results in inclusive growth and
development. In countries with diverse social and
economic profiles as in India, financial education is
particularly relevant for people who are resource poor,
operate at the margin and are vulnerable to persistent
downward financial pressures.
IV.28 Financial education can broadly be defined
as the capacity to have a familiarity with and also an
understanding of financial market products, especially
risks and rewards to make informed choices. The
Reserve Bank has taken a number of measures for
increasing financial literacy.
i) RBI has undertaken a project titled ‘Project
Financial Literacy’ with the objective of
disseminating information regarding the
central bank and general banking concepts
to various target groups including school and
college going children, women, rural and
urban poor, defence personnel and senior
citizens.
ii) A multilingual website in 13 Indian languages
on all matters concerning banking and the
common person was launched by the Reserve
Bank in June, 2007.
iii) With a view to introducing banking to school
children, illustrated books have been made
available on the website. Similar books have
been prepared for the different target groups
and are widely distributed in regional
languages through various Regional Offices
of the Reserve Bank.
iv) Financial literacy programmes are being
launched in each state with the active
involvement of the State Government and the
SLBC. These programmes include skits, road
shows, exhibitions, workshops, seminars, and
dissemination through radio and television.
IV.29 A model scheme on financial literacy and
credit counselling centres (FLCCs) was formulated
by the Reserve Bank and communicated to all SCBs
and RRBs with the advice to set up the centres as
distinct entities, such that the FLCCs’ services are
available even to other banks’ customers in the
district.
IV.30 Financial education stresses on the
capacity building measures to enable small and
marginal borrowers to avail of the entire suite of
financial products and services i.e., savings,
remittance, insurance and pension from the
banking sector, in addition to credit. In view of the
utility of these centres as expressed by state
governments and other stakeholders, banks have
been advised to set up FLCCs in all districts. As on
March 2011, 252 FLCCs were set up in various states
of the country.
IV.31 During 2010-11, the Reserve Bank organised
the second Frontline Managers’ Conferences on
financial inclusion to review the progress made in
furthering financial inclusion, understand the problems
impeding financial inclusion at the ground level from
demand and delivery perspective and get a feel of
the ground realities on the current status of our
financial inclusion efforts. Grassroot level
functionaries of banks, MFIs, BCs, technology
providers and representative customers of financial
services from across the country participated in the
conference.
IV.32 In the wake of the Andhra Pradesh micro
finance crisis in 2010, concerns were expressed by
various stakeholders and the need was felt to review
regulation of NBFCs which function as MFIs. As
indicated in the Second Quarter Review of November
2010, a Sub-Committee of the Central Board of the
Reserve Bank (Chairman: Shri Y. H. Malegam) was
constituted to study issues and concerns in the MFI
sector (Box IV.2).
OUTREACH ACTIVITIES
IV.33 Cognizant of the beneficial impact of outreach
activities, these flagship events were carefully
orchestrated to ensure financial inclusion, emphasising focus on financial education and literacy
initiatives across the country during the year. A total
of 214 villages, including 167 villages identified in the
preceding Platinum Jubilee year of the Reserve Bank,
were taken up for being transformed into ‘Model
Villages’.
Box IV.2
Committee on the MFI Sector (Malegam Committee)
The Malegam Committee in its January 2011 report, inter
alia, recommended (i) creation of a separate category of
NBFC-MFIs; (ii) a margin cap and an interest rate cap on
individual loans; (iii) transparency in interest charges;
(iv) lending by not more than two MFIs to any individual
borrower; (v) creation of one or more credit information
bureaus; (vi) establishment of a proper system of grievance
redressal procedure by MFIs; (vii) creation of one or more
“social capital funds”; and (viii) continuation of categorisation
of bank loans to MFIs, complying with the regulation laid
down for NBFC-MFIs, under the priority sector.
Based on the feedback received, the broad regulation
framework recommended by the Committee have been
accepted. The SCBs have accordingly been advised in May,
2011 that bank credit to MFIs extended on or after April 1,
2011 for onward-lending to individuals and also to members
of self help groups (SHGs)/joint liability groups (JLGs) would
be eligible for categorisation as priority sector advance under
respective categories viz., agriculture, MSE, and micro credit
(for other purposes), as indirect finance, provided not less
than 85 per cent of total assets of MFI (other than cash,
balances with banks and financial institutions, Government
securities and money market instruments) are in the nature
of “qualifying assets”.
In addition, aggregate amount of loan, extended for income
generating activity, is not less than 75 per cent of the total
loans given by MFIs.
• A “qualifying asset” shall mean a loan disbursed by MFI,
which inter alia satisfies criteria such as (i) the borrower’s
household annual income does not exceed `60,000 in
rural areas and `1,20,000 in non-rural areas; (ii) loan
does not exceed `35,000 in the first cycle and `50,000
in the subsequent cycles; (iii) total indebtedness of the
borrower does not exceed `50,000; (iv) the loan is
without collateral; (v) loan is repayable by weekly,
fortnightly or monthly installments as per borrower’s
choice
• Further, banks have to ensure that MFIs comply with
the stipulated caps on margin and interest rate as also other pricing guidelines, to be eligible to classify these
loans as priority sector loans:
i) Margin cap at 12 per cent for all MFIs. The interest
cost is to be calculated on average fortnightly
balances of outstanding borrowings and interest
income is to be calculated on average fortnightly
balances of outstanding loan portfolio of qualifying
assets.
ii) Interest cap on individual loans at 26 per cent per
annum for all MFIs to be calculated on a reducing
balance basis.
iii) Only three components are to be included in pricing
of loans viz., (a) a processing fee not exceeding 1
per cent of the gross loan amount, (b) the interest
charge and (c) the insurance premium.
iv) The processing fee is not to be included in the
margin cap or the interest cap of 26 per cent.
v) Only the actual cost of insurance i.e., actual cost of
group insurance for life, health and livestock for
borrower and spouse can be recovered;
administrative charges to be recovered as per IRDA
guidelines.
vi) No penalty for delayed payment.
vii) No security deposit/ margin to be taken.
• The banks should obtain from MFIs, at the end of each
quarter, a Chartered Accountant’s Certificate stating,
inter alia, that (i) 85 per cent of total assets of the MFI
are in the nature of “qualifying assets’’, (ii) the aggregate
amount of loan, extended for income generation activity,
is not less than 75 per cent of the total loans given by
the MFIs, and (iii) pricing guidelines are followed.
• Bank loans to MFIs, which do not comply with above
conditions and bank loans to other NBFCs, will not be
reckoned as priority sector loans w.e.f. April 1, 2011.
The bank loans extended prior to April 1, 2011 classified
under priority sector will continue to be reckoned under
priority sector till maturity of such loans.
IV.34 During the outreach programmes of grassroot
level sensitisation, various events such as lectures,
demonstrations, exhibitions and skits were organised
to educate people about the role played by the
Reserve Bank in their daily life. The outreach events received all round acclaim from the public,
Government officials and banks and attracted the
interest of electronic and print media in the country.
The participation of the top executives of the Bank
(in 34 outreach programmes in 2010-11) along with
other dignitaries from banks, NABARD and State
Government agencies generated new hopes among
the public in rural areas as evident from their wholehearted
involvement in these programmes. The
Reserve Bank endeavours to ensure sustained postevent
momentum so that long-term objectives of
financial inclusion are attained.
|