The Reserve Bank conducted government’s market borrowing programme smoothly during 2012-13 despite tight
liquidity conditions. The weighted average yield of dated government securities declined and the weighted average
maturity increased. To encourage savings by offering better menu choices to risk-averse investors, amidst high
inflation in recent years, the Reserve Bank issued inflation indexed bonds.
DEBT MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT
Market Borrowings
VII.1 The financial year 2012-13 was characterised
by sustained inflationary pressure and tight liquidity
conditions. The Reserve Bank, as the government’s
debt manager conducted the borrowing programme
smoothly, guided by the twin objectives of
minimisation of cost and pursuit of maturity profiles
that are consistent with low rollover risk. Market
borrowing to the tune of `5580 billion was
successfully completed. Securities amounting `18
billion, however devolved on primary dealers as
compared with `121 billion during the previous year.
The gross and net amounts raised through dated
securities in 2012-13 were higher by around 9 per
cent and 7 per cent, respectively than those raised
in the previous year (Table VII.1).
Table VII.1: Gross and Net Market Borrowings of the Central Government # |
(` billion) |
Item |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Net Borrowings |
3,254 |
4,364 |
4,674 |
|
(3,450) |
(3,430) |
(4,790) |
Gross Borrowings |
4,370 |
5,100 |
5,580 |
|
(4,571) |
(4,171) |
(5,696) |
#: Issuances through dated securities.
Note: Figures in brackets are budget estimates. |
VII.2 The weighted average yield of dated
securities declined to 8.36 per cent in 2012-13
compared to 8.52 per cent in 2011-12 due to easing
of yield mainly for the long dated securities. The
weighted average coupon on the outstanding stock
of Government dated securities, however, increased
to 7.97 per cent as on March 31, 2013 from 7.88
per cent as on March 31, 2012 (Table VII.2).
Table VII.2: Central Government’s Market Loans - A Profile# |
(Yield in per cent, Maturity in years) |
Year |
Range of YTMs at Primary Issues |
Issues during the year |
Outstanding Stock
(As at end-March) |
Under 5 years |
5-10 years |
Over 10 years |
Weighted Average Yield |
Tenor of securities |
Weighted Average Maturity |
Weighted Average Maturity |
Weighted Average Coupon |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
2008-09 |
7.71-8.42 |
7.69-8.77 |
7.77-8.81 |
7.69 |
6-30 |
13.8 |
10.45 |
8.23 |
2009-10 |
6.09-7.25 |
6.07-7.77 |
6.85-8.43 |
7.23 |
5-15 |
11.16 |
9.82 |
7.89 |
2010-11 |
5.98-8.67 |
7.17-8.19 |
7.64-8.63 |
7.92 |
5-30 |
11.62 |
9.78 |
7.81 |
2011-12 |
8.21-8.49 |
7.80-10.01 |
8.25-9.28 |
8.52 |
7-30 |
12.66 |
9.60 |
7.88 |
2012-13 |
8.82-8.21 |
7.86-8.76 |
7.91-8.06 |
8.36 |
5-30 |
13.50 |
9.67 |
7.97 |
#: Excludes issuances under MSS; YTM: Yield to Maturity. |
VII.3 A large volume of long dated securities was
issued during the year which resulted in the average
maturity of debt issuances during 2012-13 to
increase to 13.50 years from 12.66 years during
the previous year.
VII.4 The weighted average maturity of the
outstanding stock (based on residual maturity)
increased to 9.67 years as on March 31, 2013 from
9.60 years as on March 31, 2012 (Table VII.2).
During 2012-13 about 31 per cent of the market
borrowings were raised through issuance of dated
securities with maturity of 10-15 years as compared
to 24 per cent in 2011-12 (Table VII.3).
Table VII.3: Issuance of GoI Dated Securities – Maturity Pattern |
(` billion) |
Residual Maturity |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
Amount
raised |
Percentage
to total |
Amount
raised |
Percentage
to total |
Amount
raised |
Percentage
to total |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Less than 5 years |
110 |
2.52 |
180 |
3.53 |
470 |
8.42 |
5 -9.99 years |
1,520 |
34.78 |
2,340 |
45.88 |
1,910 |
34.23 |
10-14.99 years |
1,640 |
37.53 |
1,230 |
24.12 |
1,730 |
31.00 |
15 -19.99 years |
540 |
12.36 |
650 |
12.75 |
270 |
4.84 |
20 years & above |
560 |
12.81 |
700 |
13.73 |
1,200 |
21.51 |
Total |
4,370 |
100.00 |
5,100 |
100.00 |
5,580 |
100.00 |
VII.5 As per the Union Budget 2013-14, the gross
market borrowings of the GoI through dated
securities is estimated at `5,790 billion (net `4,840
billion) excluding `500 billion of buybacks/switches.
The issuance calendar for dated securities for the
first half of 2013-14 was issued in consultation with
the GoI on March 18, 2013. An amount of `3,490
billion is scheduled to be raised in the first half as
against `3,700 billion raised during the
corresponding period of the previous year. Market
borrowing of `2,400 billion in gross terms (and
`2,272 billion in net terms) was completed by
August 5, 2013. The weighted average maturity of
the dated securities increased to 14.4 years from
13.62 years during the corresponding period of the previous year. The weighted average yield during
the primary auctions (excluding IIBs) eased to 7.80
percent from 8.50 per cent during the corresponding
period of the previous year.
VII.6 The yields on auction of Treasury Bills
showed a declining trend till the middle of the
quarter ending June 2013, but started hardening
subsequent to the Fed Chairman’s response in May
2013. Yields on Treasury Bills went up further
significantly (by 273 bps and 209 bps for 91-day
and 364-day treasury bills, respectively) subsequent
to the liquidity tightening measures.
VII.7 The Union Budget 2013-14 had proposed
to introduce instruments that will protect savings
from inflation, especially the savings of the poor
and middle classes. In the backdrop of the budget
announcement, Inflation Indexed Bonds (IIBs) were
issued through auction method on June 4 and 25,
2013 which is expected to provide benchmarks for
the real yield and subsequently, IIBs exclusively for
retail investors would be issued in the second half
of 2013-14 (Box VII.1).
Cash Management
VII.8 The Government started the year 2012-13
with a surplus cash balance of `742 billion, but
soon took recourse to WMA on April 12, 2012 due
to its expenditure commitments (Chart VII.1).
Thereafter GoI has availed WMA for 12 occasions
before recording positive balance from September
15, 2012 till March 31, 2013. During the year,
the Government of India was in WMA for 40
days and did not avail OD as compared with
WMA for 263 days and OD on 70 days in the
previous year.
Box VII.1
Issuance of Inflation Indexed Bonds
The debt management strategy should have a bouquet of
instruments at its disposal for managing public debt in a costeffective
and non-disruptive manner. IIBs have emerged as
a critical instrument for government market borrowing across
the developed and emerging market economies (Table 1).
Table 1: Composition of Domestic Bonds issued by
Central Government: Cross Country |
(as % of outstanding) (As at end 2011) |
Country |
Floating Rate |
Fixed Rate |
Inflation Indexed |
Exchange Rate linked |
Others |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Argentina |
14.8 |
0.8 |
49.2 |
34.6 |
0.7 |
Brazil |
31.9 |
37.5 |
30.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
Chile |
0.0 |
19.2 |
80.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
India |
2.4 |
97.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Indonesia |
22.2 |
77.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Canada |
0.0 |
92.5 |
7.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
South Africa |
11.6 |
70.8 |
17.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Mexico |
41.4 |
36.6 |
22.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Germany |
10.9 |
85.8 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
UK |
0.0 |
77.6 |
22.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
USA |
0.0 |
91.2 |
8.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Source: Bank for International Settlements (BIS). |
Although the debt management strategy shall be using variety
of instruments for successful completion of market borrowing
programme, it has largely relied on fixed rate nominal bonds.
One variant of IIBs, 5 year Capital Index Bond (CIB) was
issued on December 29, 1997 wherein only the principal
repayment at the time of redemption was indexed to inflation.
The response to the issue was, however, subdued as interest
payment was not protected against inflation.
It is known fact that SLR requirement for banks and
requirement of some minimum investment in G-Sec for
insurance companies and provident funds provides significant
captive demand for G-Sec. In view of market borrowing at
elevated level, debt management strategy should continuously strive to broaden the investors’ base, especially to tackle with
the eventuality of decline in captive demand for G-Sec.
Towards this end, based on the past experience, feedback
from market participants and learning from international
experiences, a new version of IIB has been designed with an
inherent protection from inflation to both interest payment and
principal repayment. The main features are:
i) Principal would be indexed to inflation (index ratio);
ii) Coupon will be paid on the indexed principal;
iii) Higher of the adjusted principal or the face value will be
paid at redemption; and
iv) Wholesale Price Index (WPI) will be used for indexation
of principal.
The Reserve Bank launched this product by the name of
Inflation Indexed Government Stock and the first auction for
`10 billion was conducted on June 4, 2013. Besides helping
the government market borrowing, this product may also have
host of other benefits. The issuance of IIBs may improve
credibility of the public policy towards price stability. Long-term
funding is always fraught with inflation risk that could be
obviated by borrowing through inflation linked instruments. It
would provide a benchmark for the private sector and banks,
facilitating them to raise long-term resources through inflation
linked instruments. Therefore, this product may be a great
catalyst for infrastructure funding. It would also enable
improved gauging of inflationary expectations that is critical
for monetary policy formulation. The investment of financial
savings in gold by people for inflation hedging may come
down and help balance of payments of the country.
Non-competitive portion has been earmarked up to 20 per
cent of the notified amount to encourage retail participation.
Some demand from institutional investors such as insurance
companies, pension funds, provident funds, etc. is also
expected to the extent their payouts are linked to inflation.
Banks may also like to invest in this product depending upon
the tenor as it could facilitate them to raise long-term deposits.
VII.9 The limits for WMA for the first half of the
financial year 2012-13 were set at `500 billion for
first quarter and `450 billion for the second quarter.
The limit for WMA for the second half was fixed at
`200 billion. The same for the first half of the
financial year 2013-14 has been fixed at `300
billion. During the current financial year (2013-14), GoI was in WMA for 27 days and availed OD for 4
days as on August 5, 2013.
DEBT MANAGEMENT OF STATE
GOVERNMENTS
Market Borrowings
VII.10 The net allocation under the market
borrowing programme for state governments for
2012-13 was placed at `1,881 billion. Taking into
account the repayments of `306 billion, the gross
allocation amounted to `2,187 billion, while gross
sanctions under Article 293(3) amounted to `1,861
billion. The 28 state governments raised a gross
amount of `1,773 billion (net `1,467 billion) in 2012-
13 as against `1,586 billion (net `1,366 billion)
raised by 26 states in the previous year (Table VII.4).
Odisha Government did not participate in the
market borrowing programme in 2012-13 as against
Assam, Odisha and Chhattisgarh in 2011-12.
Eleven States did not raise their full sanctions in
2012-13 as against 14 States in 2011-12.The
outstanding stock of the SDLs and power bonds
stood at `8874 billion at the end of March 2013
(Table VII.5).
Table VII.4: States' Market Borrowings |
(` billion) |
Item |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14
(till Aug 5, 2013) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Net Allocation |
1,459 |
1,881 |
- |
Additional Allocation |
157 |
0 |
0 |
Maturities during the year |
220 |
306 |
291.84 |
Gross Allocation |
1,835 |
2,187 |
- |
Gross Sanctions under Article 293 (3) |
1,634 |
1,861 |
832.95 |
Gross Amount Raised during the Year |
1,586 |
1,773 |
481.31 |
Net Amount Raised during the Year |
1,366 |
1,467 |
189.47 |
Balance to be raised against GoI Sanctions |
48 |
89 |
351.64 |
Amount Raised during the year as a % of Total Sanctions |
97.09 |
95.22 |
- |
SDLs outstanding (at the end period) |
7,424 |
9,291 |
- |
Table VII.5: Residual Maturity Profile of Outstanding State Development Loans and Power Bonds (as at end-March 2013) |
(` billion) |
Year of Maturity |
State Development Loans |
Power Bonds |
Total |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2013-14 |
321 |
29 |
350 |
2014-15 |
334 |
29 |
363 |
2015-16 |
352 |
29 |
381 |
2016-17 |
315 |
14 |
329 |
2017-18 |
678 |
0 |
678 |
2018-19 |
1,181 |
0 |
1,181 |
2019-20 |
1,306 |
0 |
1,306 |
2020-21 |
1,045 |
0 |
1,045 |
2021-22 |
1,586 |
0 |
1,586 |
2022-23 |
1,654 |
0 |
1,654 |
Total |
8,772 |
101 |
8,873 |
VII.11 The weighted average yield firmed up to
8.84 per cent (2012-13) from 8.79 per cent during
the previous year (2011-12) as the weighted
average spread for SDL issuances, over the
corresponding GoI security, has increased to 71
bps compared to 44 bps over the previous year.
Cash Management
VII.12 The aggregate Normal WMA limit for States,
including the union territory of Puducherry, was
placed at `102 billion for 2012-13, which was same
as in the previous year. The rates of interest on
Normal and Special WMA and OD continued to be
linked to the repo rate. The monthly average
utilisation of WMA and OD by all the States in 2012-
13 was higher than 2011-12 for July, September-
December and February (Table VII.6). During 2013-14 (thus far), 5 states have availed of
overdrafts (Table VII.7).
Table VII.6: Utilisation of WMA/OD and Investment of State Governments@
(Average monthly outstanding) |
(` billion) |
Months |
Special WMA |
Normal WMA |
Overdraft |
Total |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
April |
10.0 |
5.0 |
0.8 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
9.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
26.0 |
12.0 |
5.8 |
May |
6.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
1.3 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
7.4 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
June |
2.0 |
0.6 |
5.8 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
5.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
2.1 |
5.1 |
2.8 |
13.2 |
July |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
2.0 |
4.8 |
5.4 |
August |
2.0 |
0.6 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
5.0 |
1.9 |
4.5 |
Sept |
1.0 |
4.0 |
|
2.0 |
4.0 |
|
0.1 |
2.0 |
|
3.1 |
10.0 |
|
Oct |
1.0 |
5.0 |
|
2.0 |
4.0 |
|
0.1 |
1.0 |
|
3.1 |
10.0 |
|
Nov |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
2.0 |
4.0 |
|
0.0 |
1.0 |
|
7.0 |
10.0 |
|
Dec |
3.0 |
4.0 |
|
1.0 |
4.0 |
|
0.1 |
2.0 |
|
4.1 |
10.0 |
|
Jan |
3.0 |
0.6 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
4.0 |
1.7 |
|
Feb |
0.5 |
0.1 |
|
1.0 |
3.0 |
|
0.0 |
2.0 |
|
1.5 |
5.1 |
|
Mar |
0.2 |
0.9 |
|
1.0 |
1.6 |
|
0.3 |
4.9 |
|
1.5 |
0.0 |
|
@ : Upto August 5, 2013. |
Table VII.7: No. of Days States Availed of Special/ Normal WMA and OD@ |
State |
Special WMA |
Normal WMA |
Overdraft |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Haryana |
23 |
13 |
2 |
22 |
12 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
Nagaland |
41 |
193 |
76 |
20 |
139 |
56 |
0 |
34 |
35 |
Punjab |
177 |
233 |
74 |
177 |
232 |
74 |
26 |
139 |
37 |
West Bengal |
185 |
134 |
38 |
59 |
48 |
15 |
28 |
13 |
9 |
Maharashtra |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Manipur |
0 |
98 |
12 |
0 |
81 |
8 |
0 |
30 |
8 |
Mizoram |
15 |
7 |
64 |
1 |
3 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Uttarakhand |
57 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Jharkhand |
5 |
14 |
8 |
4 |
14 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
0 |
0 |
0 |
136 |
136 |
23 |
5 |
11 |
0 |
Meghalaya |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
0 |
Himachal Pradesh |
- |
- |
0 |
- |
- |
12 |
- |
- |
0 |
Uttar Pradesh |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
@ : Upto August 5, 2013. |
VII.13 The surplus cash balances of state
governments are automatically invested in 14-day
Intermediate Treasury Bills (ITBs), the discount rate
of which is presently fixed at 5 per cent. The average
investment in 14-day ITBs increased from `722
billion during 2011-12 to `849 billion in 2012-13
(Table VII.8). The outstanding investments in ITBs
stood at `1,181 billion as at end-March 2013 as against `966 billion as at end-March 2012. The
weekly average investment of the state governments
in Auction Treasury Bills (ATBs) increased to `441
billion from `277 billion in the previous year. The
outstanding investment in ATBs as at end-March
2013 stood at `286 billion was higher than `220
billion at end-March 2012.
Table VII.8: Investments in ITBs and ATBs by State Governments/UTs@ |
(` billion) |
Month |
Investment in ATBs |
Investment in ITBs |
Total |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
April |
108.6 |
231.6 |
317.40 |
864.1 |
863.1 |
1002.31 |
972.7 |
1094.7 |
1319.71 |
May |
145.3 |
327.6 |
378.40 |
728.1 |
768.2 |
913.99 |
873.4 |
1095.8 |
1292.39 |
June |
249.8 |
415.9 |
549.03 |
677.9 |
681.6 |
729.45 |
927.7 |
1097.5 |
1278.48 |
July |
326.4 |
440.6 |
672.28 |
613.9 |
654.9 |
609.91 |
940.3 |
1095.5 |
1282.19 |
August |
329.6 |
450.3 |
721.82 |
645.2 |
756.3 |
646.58 |
974.8 |
1206.6 |
1368.40 |
September |
327.6 |
505.5 |
|
615.4 |
707.9 |
|
943.0 |
1213.4 |
|
October |
297.2 |
521.9 |
|
613.7 |
748.8 |
|
910.9 |
1270.7 |
|
November |
267.9 |
496.1 |
|
667.1 |
844.0 |
|
935.0 |
1340.1 |
|
December |
240.2 |
523.8 |
|
762.0 |
875.7 |
|
1002.2 |
1399.5 |
|
January |
326.3 |
546.6 |
|
717.1 |
912.2 |
|
1043.4 |
1458.8 |
|
February |
381.7 |
498.9 |
|
774.5 |
1088.8 |
|
1156.2 |
1587.7 |
|
March |
329.5 |
337.2 |
|
986.5 |
1295.5 |
|
1316.0 |
1632.7 |
|
Average |
276.5 |
441.0 |
|
722.1 |
848.9 |
|
998.6 |
1289.9 |
|
@ : Upto August 5, 2013. |
VII.14 The Reserve Bank, on behalf of the state
governments, maintains the consolidated sinking
fund (CSF) that provides a cushion for amortisation
of market borrowing/liabilities and the guarantee
redemption fund (GRF), which provides for the
servicing of contingent liability arising from
invocation of guarantees issued in respect of
borrowings by state level undertakings or other
bodies (As on March 31, 2013, as many as 21 State
Governments had subscribed to CSF and 11 States had subscribed to GRF). The outstanding
investments under CSF and GRF amounted to `485
billion and `44 billion, respectively, as at end-March
2013.
VII.15 The report of the Committee to assess
the feasibility of introducing more long-term
fixed interest rate loan products by banks
(Chairman: Shri K.K. Vohra) was placed on the
Reserve Bank’s website on January 22, 2013.
Major recommendations included issuance of longterm
bonds (minimum maturity of 5 years) to the
extent of their exposure to the infrastructure sector
by banks, popularising the fixed deposit schemes
with tenors of above 5 years as the same are eligible
for tax exemption and offering longer-tenor fixed
rate loans by banks (say up to 30 years) which
would help reduce the EMIs of the borrowers. |