Governor
Fukui and friends,
I am honoured by the kind invitation of Governor Fukui to visit your esteemed
bank. We, in the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), deeply appreciate the gesture. Governor
Toshihiko Fukui is highly respected in various central banks’ fora for his
depth of knowledge, wisdom and very transparent expositions on the economy of
Japan and the Bank of Japan’s policies. We look forward to Governor Fukui's
acceptance of our invitation to him to visit the Reserve Bank and give us the
benefit of his address. At
the outset, I would like to recall and record that, in July 1991, the Bank of
Japan (BOJ) had provided a credit facility of US$195 million to India against
the collateral of gold, which was also fully settled by us during September-November
1991. The timely gesture enabled India to maintain its impeccable reputation of
unfailingly discharging its external obligations, and proceed with the program
of stabilisation as well as reforms. In fact, that period has been a defining
moment in our economic history and separates the pre-reform period from the post-reform
period, the latter ushering in an era of high growth and stability. The
BOJ and the RBI have had, in the past, several instances of mutually beneficial
and productive interaction. For example, in June 1968, the then Governor of RBI,
had requested the Bank of Japan to depute an expert to study the export credit
problems in India and suggest improvements in the system. The Japanese consultant,
Mr. Yoshiaka Toda of BOJ, identified several gaps and weaknesses in our system,
and made several recommendations. In true Japanese tradition, Mr. Toda’s
final evaluation was that "the Indian export credit system was one of the
best conceived by central banks in the world". Introduction
to the RBI The
RBI was established under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 on April 1, 1935
as a private shareholders' bank but since its nationalisation in 1949, is fully
owned by the Government of India. The Preamble of the RBI describes the basic
functions as 'to regulate the issue of Bank notes and keeping of reserves with
a view to securing monetary stability in India and generally, to operate the currency
and credit system of the country to its advantage'. Thus, unlike the current
trend in many countries, there is no explicit mandate for price-stability or formal
inflation targeting, but the mandate appears to be similar to that of the Federal
Reserve of the USA. The twin objectives of monetary policy in India have evolved
over the years as those of maintaining price stability and ensuring adequate flow
of credit to facilitate the growth process. The relative emphasis between the
twin objectives is modulated as per the prevailing circumstances and is articulated
in the policy statements. Consideration of macro-economic and financial stability
is also subsumed in the mandate. The RBI is also entrusted with the management
of foreign exchange reserves (which include gold holding also), which are reflected
in its balance sheet. While
RBI is essentially a monetary authority, its founding statute mandates it to be
the manager of public debt of the Government of India and banker to the Government.
The
function of regulating and supervising of banks has been assigned to the RBI by
a separate legislation enacted in 1949, while the regulation of Non-Banking Finance
Companies (NBFCs) has been entrusted to it through an amendment to the RBI Act.
The powers for regulation of money markets, government securities market, forex
market and gold are derived from the RBI Act and the regulation explicitly entrusted
through government notifications under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act. The
regulation of current and capital account transactions of the external sector
was assigned to the RBI under another statute in 1999, replacing an earlier one
in 1973. In
addition to the issuance of currency, the RBI is also entrusted with the responsibilities
relating to distribution of coins. The
RBI has been assigned some responsibilities in several statutory bodies such as
public sector banks, development finance institutions governing Agriculture, Housing
and Deposit Insurance, etc. The
Reserve Bank's affairs are governed by a Central Board of Directors, consisting
of fourteen non-executive, independent directors nominated by the Government,
in addition to the Governor and up to four Deputy Governors. Besides, one Government
official is also nominated on the Board who participates in the Board meetings
but can not vote. The
RBI has 22 regional offices, mostly in state capitals. RBI is the debt-manager
and banker to State governments (i.e., the provinces constituting the Indian federation).
The
RBI renders advise to the Central and the State Governments, particularly in regard
to financial sector reforms. In
brief, the RBI has been assigned several functions, in addition to monetary management.
In performing each of the functions, the statute as well as the functional content,
requires that the RBI exercise varying degrees of autonomy and coordination vis-à-vis
the government. The three over-arching features governing the relations with the
Government are autonomy in operations; harmony in policies; and coordination in
structural transformations. Glimpses
of the Indian Economy With
only 2.3 per cent of the world’s land area (seventh-largest country), India
is the second most populous country in the world with a population of 1.029 billion,
which is among the youngest in the world. The proportion of population in the
working age group of 15-64 years is currently around 62.9 per cent and is expected
to increase to close to 70 per cent by 2026. The ‘demographic dividend’
is expected to extend over the next few decades of this millennium. India is unique
in pluralism in terms of languages, religions, ideologies and traditions spread
over twenty-eight provinces and seven federally governed union territories, each
with its distinct identity and socio-cultural ethos. While the Constitution of
India recognises 22 languages as the official languages, the number of mother
tongues in India is reported to be as high as 1,652. India is well endowed with
natural resources, human resources and varied climatic regions, which is reflected
in the institutional architecture: uniquely flexible federalism, democracy with
universal adult suffrage, and coexistence of public and private sector. A
recent but positive feature of the Indian economy is the sustained high growth
that has been experienced since the 1980s. Real GDP growth, which averaged 5.8
per cent in the 1980s and 1990s, has accelerated to 8.6 per cent in the period
2003-07. In 2006-07 (we measure our financial year from April-March) real GDP
growth was 9.2 per cent, which was one of the highest growth rates in the world
in that year. If the current GDP growth rate of around 9 per cent is maintained,
a person can hope to see the standard of living multiplying by almost five times
in his lifetime. Another
noteworthy aspect of the evolution of the Indian economy is the structural transformation
that has been underway. At the time of independence from British rule in 1947,
we were predominantly an agrarian economy with traditional industrial base, mainly
plantation and agro dependent. Today, agriculture constitutes merely 18.5 per
cent of GDP, although over 60 per cent of our population continues to depend on
agriculture in some form for livelihood. While we regard the performance of agriculture
over the past few years as unsatisfactory in terms of our expectations in view
of the stagnation in output of key crops and the volatility in agricultural activity,
some significant gains have been made in a few areas. In
the industrial sector, there is a growing realisation of productivity and efficiency
gains. In the face of free access to imports and foreign direct investment (FDI),
Indian industry is increasingly becoming internationally competitive and is aggressively
securing access to international markets on the strength of dynamic competitive
advantage. The policy environment has also played a role in this resurgence of
Indian industry. Tariffs, on a weighted average basis, are comparable to ASEAN
levels and taxes on business incomes are internationally comparable. In 2006-07,
industrial growth was 11.3 per cent and exports of manufactured goods rose by
16 per cent in US dollar terms (April- January). The
mainstay of the Indian economy is currently the services sector, which constituted
61.9 per cent of GDP in 2006-07 and contributed two-thirds of average real GDP
growth for the period 2002-07. The story of India’s information technology
(IT) capacities is well known. The impulses of growth are now strengthening in
other services as well such as engineering and consultancy, communication, entertainment,
business, finance and information services as well as a host of personal services
including tourism and hospitality. The Indian development experience is, in fact,
regarded by economists as unique in terms of the mutation of growth from a primary
economy directly to tertiary activity rather than the conventional path of primary
to secondary and then to tertiary stages of growth. The
Indian economy has evolved from a virtually closed economy until early 1980s to
one that is opening up and rapidly integrating into the global economy since the
commencement of major reforms in early 1990s. In terms of a traditional measure
of openness, the ratio of exports and imports (both goods and invisibles) to GDP
has risen steadily from 21.1 per cent in 1991-92 to over 50 per cent in 2005-06
and is expected to have gone up further in 2006-07. Both exports and imports have
been rising in recent years above the long-term trend. The merchandise trade deficit
is currently close to 7 per cent of GDP; however, the current account deficit
is under 1.5 per cent of GDP, mainly due to the knowledge and competitive advantage
we have in services and the steady support from remittances from Indians working
abroad. These factors provide an in-built cushion to the balance of payments and
help to keep the current account gap within sustainable limits. In this sense,
the Indian economy has not contributed to the current global imbalances. Since
the early 1990s, when we instituted structural reforms widely and deeply with
a progressive liberalization of the economy, India has been receiving large capital
inflows, reflecting international confidence in the underlying fundamentals of
the performance of the Indian economy. The ratio of net capital inflows to GDP
has almost doubled from 1.5 per cent in 1991-92 to 2.9 per cent in 2005-06. In
recent years, the capital flows have become even larger, accounting for 15 per
cent of global net private capital flows to emerging market economies in 2006.
There has been a pick-up in the FDI into India as well as borrowings in international
financial markets by Indian corporates. Portfolio flows into Indian stock exchanges
have shown resilience in the face of two major sell-offs in global equity markets
in May-June 2006 and February 2007. An important emerging element in the capital
account of the balance of payments is the growing FDI from India (i.e., the overseas
investments of the Indian corporates). With the financing requirement of the current
account deficit being modest, the rising profile of net capital flows has resulted
in steady accretions to the foreign exchange reserves, which have more than doubled
from US$ 76 billion at the end of March 2003 to around US$ 200 billion at the
end March 2007. While the level of foreign exchange reserves is extremely modest
compared to that of Japan, our reserves exceed each – a full year’s
imports as well as the entire external debt. Since 2002, India has turned creditor
to the IMF and has engaged in prepaying external debt. While
the RBI is invested with multiple objectives and is not mandated by law with target/instrument
autonomy, the conduct of monetary policy has consistently evolved around the goals
of sustained growth, price stability and financial stability, with a continuous
rebalancing of weights assigned to each, depending on the evolving macroeconomic
scenario. In the recent period, the objective of price stability and well-anchored
inflation expectations has been accorded priority against the backdrop of global
and domestic developments. It is heartening to note that high growth in the last
four years has been associated with a moderation of inflation. The headline inflation
rate, in terms of the wholesale price index, has declined from an average of 11.0
cent during 1990-95 to 5.3 per cent during 1995-2000 and to 4.9 per cent during
2002-07. The trending down of inflation has been associated with a significant
reduction in inflation volatility, which is indicative of well-anchored inflation
expectations, despite the visitations of adverse shocks, both domestic and external.
There
is evidence that the widening and deepening of the financial sector, the diffusion
of micro structural reforms along with improved regulatory and supervisory oversight
have enabled the development of a robust, efficient and diversified financial
system with sound and well-functioning financial markets. The combined effects
of competition, regulatory measures, policy environment and motivation have imparted
greater strength, efficiency and stability to the financial sector. The efficacy
of financial sector reforms is also reflected in the significant improvement in
the asset quality of the banking sector. Currently, all scheduled commercial banks
are compliant with the minimum capital adequacy ratio of 9 per cent. The overhang
of gross non-performing assets of scheduled commercial banks has declined from
8.80 per cent of advances in 2002-03 to 3.30 per cent in 2005-06. Operating
expenses as a ratio of total assets has declined from 2.24 per cent in 2002-03
to 2.11 per cent in 2005-06. Developments
in Monetary Policy A
monetary targeting framework was in place in India since mid-1980s and till 1997-98
with broad money (M3) as an intermediate target. In practice, the monetary targeting
framework was used in a flexible manner with feedback from developments in the
real sector. The Reserve Bank formally switched over in 1998-99 to a multiple
indicator approach. As per this approach, interest rates or rates of return in
different markets (money, capital and government securities markets), along with
data such as on currency in circulation, credit extended by banks and financial
institutions, fiscal position, trade balance, capital flows, inflation rate, exchange
rate, refinancing and transactions in foreign exchange, which are available with
high-frequency, are juxtaposed with the trends in output, with a view to deriving
policy perspectives. The multiple indicator approach made the monetary policy
operation more broad-based on a large set of information and provided flexibility
in the conduct of monetary management. As
regards the operating procedure of monetary policy in India, reliance on direct
instruments has been reduced and a policy preference for indirect instruments
has become the cornerstone of current monetary policy operations. However, recourse
to direct instruments is taken when warranted by the circumstances. Liquidity
management in the system is carried out through open market operations (OMO) in
the form of outright purchases/sales of government securities and daily reverse
repo and repo operations under a Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF). The
liquidity management was further refined in 2004 with the introduction of a market
stabilisation scheme (MSS) under which the Reserve Bank was allowed to issue government
securities as part of liquidity sterilisation operations in the wake of large
capital inflows and surplus liquidity conditions. While these issuances do not
provide budgetary support, interest costs are borne by the fisc; and as far as
Government securities market is concerned, these securities are also traded in
the secondary market, on par with the other government stock. The
Reserve Bank has been actively engaged in developing, widening and deepening of
money, government securities and foreign exchange markets combined with a robust
payments and settlement system various markets. The medium-term framework is to
keep developing the financial markets, preserving the integrity of financial markets
and thereby, improving the transmission of monetary policy impulses. Some
of the important developments pertaining to the money market are: First, with
a view to transforming the call/notice money market into a pure inter-bank market
with participation of banks and primary dealers (PDs) only, non-bank participants
have been completely phased out of the call money market. Second, several new
financial instruments have been introduced. The traditional refinance support
on fixed terms has been replaced by a full-fledged Liquidity Adjustment Facility
with a view to modulating short-term liquidity under diverse market conditions.
Third, measures have also been taken to make various other money market instruments
(such as CDs, CPs, etc.) freely accessible to non-bank participants. These
measures were intended to improve the depth of as well as the efficiency and transparency
of operations in the money market. Fourth, as part of the development of new instruments,
a major initiative pertains to Collateralised Borrowing and Lending Obligation
(CBLO), which was operationalised as a money market instrument. As
a debt manager to the Government, the development of a deep and liquid market
for Government securities is of critical importance to the Reserve Bank as this
results in better price discovery and reduces the cost of Government borrowing.
This market is also important for an effective transmission mechanism for monetary
policy and facilitating the introduction and pricing of hedging products and serve
as benchmarks for other debt instruments. Efforts towards development of the Government
securities market have focused on three areas: institutional measures, innovations
through instruments, and enabling market development measures. Major
developments in Government securities market include: establishment of a Delivery
versus Payment system to reduce settlement risk; institution of the system of
Primary Dealers to strengthen market intermediation; formation of market bodies
such as Fixed Income Money Market and Derivatives Association of India (FIMMDA),
and Primary Dealers Association of India (PDAI) to improve practices; permission
to Foreign Institutional Investors to invest in Government securities in both
the primary and secondary markets, with a view to broaden the markets; operationalisation
of the Negotiated Dealing System (NDS); and the announcement of an indicative
auction calendar for Treasury Bills and dated securities, to help investors plan
their investment better and to enhance transparency and stability in the Government
securities market. The
RBI has undertaken various measures towards development of spot as well as forward
segments of foreign exchange market. Market participants have also been provided
with greater flexibility to undertake foreign exchange operations and manage their
risks. This has been facilitated through simplification of procedures and availability
of several new instruments, e.g., foreign currency-rupee options. Authorised dealers
have been permitted to use innovative products like cross-currency options, interest
rate swaps (IRS) and currency swaps, caps/collars and forward rate agreements
(FRAs) in the international forex market. There has also been significant improvement
in market infrastructure in terms of trading platform and settlement mechanisms.
Financial
Sector Development The
banking sector reforms in India, initiated since 1992 have brought about structural
changes in the financial sector by easing external constraints in the working
of the banks. Major policy measures include phased reductions in statutory pre-emption
like cash reserve and statutory liquidity requirements and deregulation of interest
rates on deposits and lending, except for a select segment. The diversification
of ownership of banking institutions is yet another feature which has enabled
private shareholding in the public sector banks, through listing on the stock
exchanges, arising from dilution of the Government ownership. On account of healthy
market value of the banks’ shares, the capital infusion into the banks by
the Government has turned out profitable for the Government. Foreign direct investment
in the private sector banks is now allowed up to 74 per cent, subject to the prescribed
guidelines. The
co-existence of the public sector, private sector and the foreign banks has generated
competition in the banking sector leading to a significant improvement in efficiency
and customer service. The share of private and foreign banks in total assets increased
to 27.6 per cent at end-March 2006 from 24.7 per cent at end-March 2005 and less
than 10.0 per cent at the inception of reforms. The
prudential regulatory norms for the banks for capital adequacy, income recognition,
asset classification and provisioning have progressively moved towards convergence
with the international best practices. The Basel – II capital adequacy framework
is being implemented in a phased manner, and the RBI has issued the final guidelines
recently. A three-track approach has been adopted for the three types of banks,
i.e., commercial banks, cooperative banks and regional rural banks, to facilitate
smooth transition. These norms have strengthened the financials of the banking
sector, as evident from a decline in non-performing loans and improvement in capital
adequacy ratio – despite progressive stringency of the norms. For instance,
as on March 31, 2007, nine out of 25 public sector banks have reported zero net
NPAs, as a proportion to the total advances. This has been possible also on account
of certain legislative and institutional measures implemented to expedite and
facilitate the recovery of NPAs through special tribunals and restructuring mechanism.
There is an increasing focus on governance aspects in the banks through adoption
of 'fit and proper' criteria for the owners, directors and senior managers of
the banks. The
Reserve Bank has also initiated a number of steps – institutional, procedural
and operational – for making the payment systems safe, secure and efficient. For
efficiency enhancements and risk reduction, usage of the Real Time Gross Settlement
(RTGS) System and other electronic payment mechanisms have been encouraged in
a big way. The Reserve Bank has also provided a significant thrust to implementation
of information technology in the banking sector. To
strengthen the supervisory framework within the RBI, a Board for Financial Supervision
(BFS) was constituted in 1994,comprising select members of the Reserve Bank’s
Central Board with a variety of professional expertise to exercise 'undivided
attention to supervision' and ensure an integrated approach to supervision of
commercial banks and financial institutions. The Reserve Bank also instituted
an Off-site Monitoring and Surveillance (OSMOS) system for banks in 1995, which
provides for Early Warning System (EWS) as also a trigger for on-site inspections
of the vulnerable institutions. The scope and coverage of off-site surveillance
has since been widened to capture various facets of efficiency and risk management
of banks. As
we progress further in the reform process, the main focus would be to ensure that
the pace of further deregulation and liberalisation remains consistent with the
progress of reform in the real and fiscal sectors. In practice, within the given
legal framework, priorities have to be appropriately set ensuring implementation
of intended reforms in banking sector in tune with the evolving domestic and external
developments. Summing
up To
sum up, India reflects diversity; yet there is an overwhelming preference in Indian
society and polity for confluence. This is particularly reflected in the stability
of the political system, which, in turn, has contributed to macroeconomic stability
and sustained growth. Turning to the outlook, growth prospects of Indian economy
have strengthened considerably and appear well entrenched to build on the current
momentum. The overarching policy challenge at this juncture is to manage the transition
to a higher growth path while containing inflationary pressures. The Reserve Bank’s
policy endeavor would be to contain inflation close to 5.0 per cent in 2007-08
and in the range of 4.0–4.5 per cent over the medium-term with a view to
maintaining self-accelerating growth. The likely evolution of macroeconomic and
financial conditions indicates an environment supportive of sustaining the current
growth momentum in India complemented by appropriate emphasis on price stability
and anchoring inflation expectations. Let
me conclude by expressing my deep appreciation of the kind courtesies extended
by the Bank of Japan, and in particular, for the warm hospitality extended by
respected Governor Fukui. Address
by Dr. Y.V. Reddy, Governor, Reserve Bank of India at the Bank of Japan, Tokyo,
on May 27, 2007 |