RBI /2004/123
IDMD.PDRS. 05 /10.02.01/2003-04
March 29, 2004
To All RBI Regulated Entities
Dear Sirs,
Transactions in Government
Securities
Please refer to paragraph 70 of
the 'Mid-term
Review of Monetary and Credit Policy for the year 2003-2004' (extract enclosed),
wherein certain relaxations in the current guidelines on sale of government
securities were announced to facilitate deepening of government securities market.
As per the current guidelines, a sale transaction in a government security is
permitted only if the seller actually holds the security in its portfolio. In
partial modification of these guidelines, it was proposed in the Mid-term Review
that sale of a government security, already contracted for purchase, would also
be permitted, provided such purchase contract was either guaranteed by an approved
central counterparty like the Clearing Corporation of India Ltd (CCIL) or the
counterparty thereof was the Reserve Bank. It was also indicated that, to facilitate
operationalisation of the proposal, the settlement of government securities
transactions would be switched over to the DVP III mode.
2. The modifications in the existing
guidelines in accordance with the above proposals are expected to improve the
liquidity in government securities market by enabling sale of a government security
on the day of purchase, reducing the price risk on the part of the market participants.
Further, as the relaxation enables rollover of repos, it would facilitate non-banks
to move away from the call/notice money market and also enable banks to reduce
their dependence on the call money market.
3. In accordance with the above
announcement, it has now been decided:
- to permit sale of a government security already
contracted for purchase, provided:
- the purchase contract is confirmed prior to
the sale,
- the purchase contract is guaranteed by CCIL
or the security is contracted for purchase from the Reserve Bank and,
- the sale transaction will settle either in
the same settlement cycle as the preceding purchase contract, or in a subsequent
settlement cycle so that the delivery obligation under the sale contract
is met by the securities acquired under the purchase contract(e.g. when
a security is purchased on T+0 basis, it can be sold on either T+0 or T+1
basis on the day of the purchase; if however it is purchased on T+1 basis,
it can be sold on T+1 basis on the day of purchase or on T+0 or T+1 basis
on the next day); and,
- to shift the settlement of government securities
transactions carried out through CCIL to the DVP-III mode so that each security
is deliverable/receivable on a net basis for a particular settlement cycle
as against the current system of gross settlement of securities under the
DVP-II mode.
4. It is clarified that so far
as purchase of securities from the Reserve Bank through Open Market Operations
(OMO) is concerned, no sale transactions should be contracted prior to receiving
the confirmation of the deal/advice of allotment from the Reserve Bank.
5. As a corollary to the above
changes, it is also advised that ready forward (repo) transactions in government
securities, which are settled under the guaranteed settlement mechanism of CCIL,
may be rolled over, provided the security prices and repo interest rate are
renegotiated on roll over. It is clarified that the purchase contract referred
to in paragraph 3(a)(i) above will include the second (repurchase) leg of a
repo transaction. That is, the borrower of funds (i.e., seller in the first
leg) in a repo may sell the securities contracted for repurchase, on T+0 or
T+1 basis for a settlement cycle coinciding with the second leg of the repo
or for a subsequent settlement cycle. However, the lender of funds (i.e; the
buyer in the first leg) in a repo, should not sell the securities purchased
in the repo, during the tenor of the repo contract.
6. It is further clarified that
the existing special dispensation pertaining to the sale of government securities
allotted by the Reserve Bank under the primary auctions will continue to be
available.
7. All regulated entities are advised
to exercise abundant caution to ensure adherence to these guidelines. The concurrent
auditors should specifically verify the compliance with these instructions.
The concurrent audit reports should contain specific observations on the compliance
with the above instructions and should be incorporated in the monthly report
to the Chairman and the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of the entity
and the half yearly review to be placed before the Board of Directors. CCIL
will make available to all market participants as part of its daily reports,
the time stamp of all transactions as received from NDS. The mid office/back
office and the auditors may use this information to supplement their checks/scrutiny
of transactions for compliance with the instructions. Any violation noticed
in this regard should immediately be reported to the concerned regulatory department
of the Reserve Bank and the Public Debt Office (PDO), Reserve Bank of India,
Mumbai. Any violation noticed in this regard would attract penalties as currently
applicable to the bouncing of Subsidiary General Ledger (SGL) forms even if
the deal has been settled because of the netting benefit under DVP III, besides
attracting further regulatory action as deemed necessary.
8. The above revised guidelines
will come into effect from April 2, 2004. The working of the arrangement will
be reviewed periodically to consider modifications and continuance, as appropriate.
Yours faithfully,
H.R.Khan
Chief General Manager-In-Charge