RBI/2005-06/219
UBD. PCB.Cir No. 20/ 09.11.600/ 2005-06
November 24, 2005
The Chief Executive Officers of All Primary (Urban) Co-operative
Banks
Dear Sir/ Madam
Mid-Term Review of Annual Policy Statement for the year 2005-06:
Additional Provisioning Requirement for Standard Assets-UCBs
In terms of the extant prudential guidelines,
the standard assets attract a uniform provisioning requirement of 0.25 per cent
of the funded outstanding on a portfolio basis. Traditionally, banks’ loans
and advances portfolio is pro-cyclical and tends to grow faster during an expansionary
phase and grows slowly during a recessionary phase. During times of expansion
and accelerated credit growth, there is a tendency to underestimate the level
of inherent risk and the converse holds good during times of recession. It is
therefore necessary to build up provisioning to cushion banks' balance sheets
in the event of a downturn in the economy or credit weaknesses surfacing later.
2. In this connection, please refer to Paragraph
85 of the Mid-Term Review of Annual Policy Statement for the year 2005-06 (copy
of the paragraph enclosed). We advise that taking into account the recent
trends in credit growth, it has been decided that the general provisioning requirement
for ‘standard advances’ shall be 0.40 per cent with immediate effect from the
present level of 0.25 percent. However, direct advances to agricultural and
SME sectors which are standard assets, would attract a uniform provisioning
requirement of 0.25 per cent of the funded outstanding on a portfolio basis,
as hitherto.
3. The higher provisioning requirements stipulated
at para 2 above will be applicable for Unit banks and UCBs having multiple branches
within a single district with deposits base of Rs 100 crore and above, and all
other UCBs operating in more than one district. For other UCBs the existing
requirement of provisioning of 0.25 % for standard asset will continue.
Note: The deposit base for the above shall be
determined on the basis of fortnightly average of the demand and time liabilities
in the immediate preceding financial year.
4. These provisions would be eligible for
inclusion in Tier II capital for capital adequacy purposes up to the permitted
extent, as hitherto.
5. Please acknowledge receipt to concerned
Regional Office of the Reserve Bank.
Yours faithfully,
(N.S Vishwanathan)
Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Extract of Mid-Term Review of Annual Policy Statement for the
year 2005-06
Prudential Provisioning Requirements: Review
82. In terms of the prudential guidelines,
banks are required to assess their entire loans and advances portfolio on an
account-by-account basis with regard to the degree of delinquency and classify
them into four broad asset classification categories, viz., standard,
sub-standard, doubtful and loss. The standard assets attract a uniform provisioning
requirement of 0.25 per cent of the funded outstanding on a portfolio basis.
Banks are required to make specific provisions in respect of sub-standard assets
at a uniform rate of 10 per cent of the funded outstanding and for doubtful
accounts at rates ranging from 20 to 100 per cent, taking into account the period
for which the account has remained non-performing and the realisable value of
security charged to the bank.
83. Traditionally, banks’ loans and advances
portfolio is pro-cyclical and tends to grow faster during an expansionary phase
and grows slowly during a recessionary phase. During times of expansion and
accelerated credit growth, there is a tendency to underestimate the level of
inherent risk and the converse holds good during times of recession. This tendency
is not effectively addressed by the above mentioned prudential specific provisioning
requirements since they capture risk ex post but not ex ante.
84. The various options available for reducing
the element of pro-cyclicality include, among others, adoption of objective
methodologies for dynamic provisioning requirements, as is being done by a few
countries, by estimating the requirements over a business cycle rather than
a year on the basis of the riskiness of the assets, establishment of a linkage
between the prudential capital requirements and through-the-cycle ratings instead
of point-in-time ratings and establishment of a flexible loan-to-value (LTV)
ratio requirements where the LTV ratio would be directly related to the movement
of asset values.
85. Taking into account the recent trends in credit growth,
it is proposed:
• to increase the general provisioning
requirement for ‘standard advances’ from the present level of 0.25 per cent
to 0.40 per cent. Banks’ direct advances to agricultural and SME sectors would
be exempted from the additional provisioning requirement. As hitherto, these
provisions would be eligible for inclusion in Tier II capital for capital adequacy
purposes up to the permitted extent. Operational guidelines in this regard would
be issued separately.
|