Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons |
Anchor |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Monetary targeting |
Some monetary aggregates can be quickly and easily controlled by the central bank.
Monetary aggregates can be accurately measured (with short lags).
Increases the transparency of monetary policy, thereby avoiding the time- inconsistency trap. |
Depends on a well-defined and stable relationship between monetary aggregates and nominal income. With financial innovations, this stability often breaks down.
Greater stress on making policy transparent (clear, simple and understandable) and on regular communication with the public may undermine credibility in the face deviations. |
Nominal income targeting |
It could be superior to monetary targeting, since it avoids the problem of velocity shocks and time inconsistency.
Allows a country to maintain independent monetary policy. |
Compels a central bank to announce a potential GDP growth number, over which it has limited control.
Concept of nominal GDP is not clearly understood by the public, lowering transparency.
Could engender time inconsistency if the central bank announces too low or too high a number, which subsequently is found to be different from the announced one. |
Exchange rate targeting |
The nominal anchor of the exchange rate fixes the inflation rate for internationally traded goods and thus, contributes directly to keeping inflation in check.
If the exchange rate target is credible, it anchors inflation expectations to the inflation rate in the anchor country to whose currency it is pegged.
Has the advantage of simplicity and clarity; well understood by the public. |
The central bank has limited control over its monetary policy.
The country becomes vulnerable to shocks emanating from the country to which its currency is pegged.
Speculative attacks on the exchange rate might force the central bank to substantially raise its interest rates, with significant economic costs. |
Inflation targeting |
Preserves independence of monetary policy.
Provides a nominal anchor for the path of price level.
Clear and simple; hence, well-understood by
the public.
Transparency increases the potential for
promoting low inflation expectations, which
helps to produce a desirable inflation
outcome. |
Too much focus on inflation often at the cost of output stabilisation.
Long and variable lags in monetary transmission means that a substantial amount of time must elapse before the success of monetary policy can be ascertained.
Efficacy could be compromised if interest rates
hit a zero lower bound.
A rigid rule does not allow enough headroom
(discretion) to respond flexibly to unforeseen
contingencies. |
Price level
targeting |
Lowers uncertainty about prices that would
prevail in the near future.
Allows economic agents to form forwardlooking
expectations, based on current price
levels.
Can prove effective when nominal interest
rates hit the zero lower bound. |
Poses communication challenges. Under this
approach, the central bank, at a minimum, needs
to specify both an intercept (level of target in the
base period) and a slope (rate of increase in target
price path over time), over and above a time
period.
Not practical experience on the success or failure
of its implementation across countries in
modern times1.
The transition costs of moving to this practice
(for countries already on inflation targeting)
could be large and uncertain. |
Just-do-it
strategy |
Constructive ambiguity in policy making
often helps central bank achieve its longterm
goal (price stability). Demonstrated success. |
Non transparent; not clear to the public what
the central bank intends to do (or, is doing).
Strongly dependent on skills and preferences of
individuals in charge of the central bank. |
Appendix Table II.2A: Inflation Targeting Countries – Advanced Economies |
Country |
Since when |
Previous / why inflation targeting |
Who sets the Target /goal independence |
Target indicator, time frame and style |
Frequency of Meeting |
Key policy rate / Operational target/ instrumental independence |
Any other comments |
Australia |
1993 |
None/Provide a new monetary anchor |
Reserve Bank Board in agreement with Governor and the Minister of Finance (Treasurer) |
Target range of 2-3 per cent inflation on average over the economic cycle. Medium term |
Normally meets 11 times each year, on the first Tuesday of each month (no meeting in January) |
Target cash rate /Interbank cash rate |
In determining monetary policy, the Bank has a duty to maintain price stability, full employment, and the economic prosperity and welfare of the Australian people. |
Canada |
1990-1991 |
None/Provide a new monetary anchor and bring down inflation |
The inflation targets are agreed jointly by the Government of Canada and the Bank of Canada |
A target rate for total CPI of 2 per cent on a 12-month basis, with a 1-3 per cent control range. The current target range extends to December 2016 |
In late 2000, the Bank of Canada adopted a system of eight pre-set dates per year on which it announces its key policy rate. |
The Bank carries out monetary policy by influencing short-term interest rates. It does this by raising and lowering the target for the overnight rate. |
The Bank also monitors a set of “core” inflation measures, including the CPIX, which strips out eight of the most volatile CPI components. These “core” measures allow the Bank to “look through” temporary changes in total CPI inflation and to focus on the underlying trend of inflation, which is a good indicator of where total CPI inflation is headed in the absence of policy action. |
Japan |
January 2013 |
|
The Act states,
'The Bank of
Japan's
autonomy
regarding
currency and
monetary
control shall be
respected.'
sufficiently.' |
Price stability
target of 2 per
cent in terms of
the year-onyear
rate of
change in the
CPI at the
earliest
possible time,
with a time
horizon of
about two
years. |
Monetary
Policy Meetings
(MPMs) are
held once or
twice a month,
for one or two
days.
Disclosure via
press releases,
minutes of the
meetings, press
conference. |
The Bank
controls the
amount of
funds in the
money market,
mainly through
money market
operations. |
The Bank supplies funds
to financial institutions
by, for example,
extending loans to them,
which are backed by
collateral submitted to
the Bank by these
institutions. Such an
operation is called a
funds-supplying
operation. |
New Zealand |
1989-90 |
None/Part of
extensive
reforms,
dissatisfaction
with earlier
outcomes;
provide a new
nominal anchor |
The Minister of
Finance and
the Governor of
the Reserve
Bank shall
together have a
separate
agreement
setting out
specific targets
for achieving
and maintaining
price stability.
This is known
as the Policy
Targets
Agreement
(PTA). |
The current
agreement,
signed in
September
2012, calls for
inflation to be
kept within 1
to 3 percent a
year, on
average over
the medium
term, with a focus on
keeping future
average
inflation near
the 2 percent
target
midpoint. The
Reserve Bank
has published
an interactive
inflation
calculator on its
website. |
Eight scheduled
decision
making
meetings in a
year. |
Official cash
rate (OCR)- the
wholesale price
of borrowed
money. |
The Reserve Bank
publishes its Monetary
Policy Statement (MPS)
quarterly. Each Monetary
Policy Statement must set
out:1) how the Reserve
Bank proposes to achieve
its targets; 2) how it
proposes to formulate
and implement monetary
policy during the next
five years; and 3) how monetary policy has been
implemented since the
last Monetary Policy
Statement. |
Norway |
2001 |
Exchange rate /
gradual
movement
towards flexible
exchange rate
and stronger
emphasis on
price stability |
The
Government
has set an
inflation target
for monetary
policy. |
The
operational
target of
monetary
policy shall be
annual
consumer price
inflation of
close to 2.5 per
cent over time. |
The Executive
Board sets the
key rate at
pre-announced
times, normally
six times a
year. |
Key policy rate,
which is the
interest rate on
banks' deposits
in Norges Bank. |
The Norges Bank’s focus
is on price stability,
financial stability and
generating added value
through investment
management. |
Sweden |
Announced
in
January
1993,
adopted
in 1995 |
Exchange rate /
Forced off a
fixed exchange
rate regime |
The Executive
Board of the
Riksbank
makes the
monetary
policy decisions
without
instruction
from any other
parties. |
2 per cent
target in annual
change in
headline CPI |
The Executive
Board holds six
scheduled
monetary
policy meetings
a year. |
Overnight repo
rate /
Overnight repo
rate target |
The Riksbank’s function
is to keep inflation close
to the goal of 2 per cent.
If the credibility of this
inflation target is not
threatened, the Riksbank
can make further
contributions to reducing
variations in areas such
as production and
employment - the 'real
economy’. |
South
Korea |
April
1998 |
|
Based on Bank
of Korea Act, it
sets the midterm
inflation
target to be
applied for
three years in
consultation
with the
government. |
The inflation
target measure
during the
period from
2013 to 2015 is
set at
2.5~3.5%,
based
on consumer
price
inflation (yearon-
year). |
The Base Rate,
the BOK's
policy rate, is
set during the
'main meeting'
of the
Monetary
Policy
Committee that
takes place
once every
month. |
The Bank of
Korea Base Rate
is the reference
policy rate. |
In addition, the Bank of
Korea also gives
explanation to the
general public as to the
status of the medium
term inflation target by
monitoring it on an
annual basis. |
UK |
October
1992 |
Exchange rate
Inflation
targeting |
Forced off a
fixed exchange
rate regime to
maintain price
stability/
Price stability
is defined by
the
Government’s
inflation target
of 2%. |
The inflation
target of 2 per
cent is
expressed in
terms of an
annual rate of
inflation based
on the
Consumer
Prices Index
(CPI). |
Monetary
Policy
Committee
meets monthly
for a two-day
meeting.
Decisions are
made by a vote
of the
Committee on
a one-person
one-vote basis. |
The 1998 Bank
of England Act
made the Bank
independent to
set interest
rates. Bank rate
is being used
since 2009;
asset purchase
as an additional
instrument. |
In August 2013 the MPC
provided some explicit guidance regarding the future conduct of monetary policy. The MPC intends at a minimum to maintain the present highly stimulative stance of monetary policy until economic slack has been substantially reduced, provided this does not entail material risks to price stability or financial stability. |
Appendix Table II.2B: Non-inflation Targeting Countries – Advanced Economies |
Country |
Since when |
Previous/any target other than inflation targeting |
Who sets the Target / Goal independence |
Target indicator, timeframe and style |
Frequency of Meeting |
Key policy rate / Operational target/ Instrumental independence |
Any other comments |
Euro area |
|
To maintain price stability is the primary objective of the Eurosystem and of the single monetary policy for which it is responsible. This is laid down in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 127 (1). |
the Governing Council. |
price stability is defined as 'a year-on-year increase in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) for the euro area of below 2 per cent. Price stability is to be maintained over the medium term'. |
Twice a month, with first day discussing overall assessment of the economic situation and the risks to price tability based on a comprehensive
economic and
monetary
analysis in the
context of the ECB’s (two-pillar) monetary
policy strategy. |
Minimum
rate in main
refinancing
operation
(MRO) and the
interest rates
on the marginal
lending facility
and the deposit
facility. |
The Euro
system currently
accepts a
very broad
range of debt
instruments,
issued
both by public
and private
issuers. |
Switzerland |
|
The Swiss
National
Bank (SNB)
implements its
monetary policy
by fixing a target
range for the
three-month Swiss franc
Libor. |
Article 99 of
the Federal
Constitution
entrusts the
SNB, as an
independent
central bank,
with the conduct of
monetary policy
in the interests
of the country
as a whole. |
SNB equates
price stability
with a rise in
the national
consumer price
index of less
than 2 per cent
per annum in terms of total
CPI. |
Quarterly
meetings
(March, June,
September and
December) with
press release
and bulletin
publication. |
CHF 3-month
Libor. |
Medium-
term inflation
forecasts. |
Singapore |
Early 1980s |
Centred on the
management of
the exchange
rate. |
The exchange
rate policy band
is periodically
reviewed to
ensure that
it remains
consistent with
the underlying
fundamentals of
the economy. |
The objective
of Singapore's
exchange rate
policy has
always been
to promote
sustained and
non-inflationary
growth for
the Singapore
economy. |
Regular
monetary policy
announcements
are scheduled
in April and
October. |
The tradeweighted
exchange rate
is allowed to
fluctuate within
a policy band,
and where
necessary,
Monetary
Authority of
Singapore (MAS)
conducts direct
interventions
in the foreign
exchange
market to
maintain the
exchange rate
within this
band. |
MAS' monetary
policy is
centred on the
management of
the exchange
rate rather
than targeting
interest rate
levels. |
United
States |
|
No formal
target/
The Committee
judges that
inflation at
the rate of 2
per cent, as
measured by
the annual
change in the
price index
for personal
consumption
expenditures, is
most consistent
over the longer
run. |
Statutory
Mandate from
the Congress. |
Maximum
employment,
stable prices,
and moderate
long-term
interest rates. |
FOMC meetings
and press
conference. |
Decision by
consensus/
Eight scheduled
per year, with
others as
needed/
Meetings may
last one or two
days. |
In the most
recent
projections,
FOMC
participants’
estimates of
the longer-run
normal rate of
unemployment
had a central
tendency of 5.2-
6.0 per cent. |
Source: BIS MC Compendium, Petursson (2004), monthly bulletin, Handbook of Central Banking, 29, Bank of England, different central bank
websites till January 10, 2014 |
Appendix Table II.3: Inflation Targeting Countries – Emerging Market Economies |
Country |
Since when |
Previous / why inflation targeting |
Who sets the Target / operational independence |
Target indicator, timeframe and style |
Frequency of Meeting |
Key policy rate |
Any other comments |
Performance on inflation |
Chile |
September 1999 |
High inflation due to expansionary policies, oil price hike during Gulf war, failure with exchange rate based stabilisation programme, instability of money demand and difficulty in monetary targeting, provide a new monetary anchor and gradual disinflation. |
Central bank/ Yes |
Annual CPI (headline) Point target: 3 per cent/ +/-1 percentage point/ Around 2 years. |
Monetary Policy Report/ 4 times a year. |
Monetary Policy Interest Rate (Overnight interbank rate). |
|
|
Brazil |
June 1999 |
Due to concerns on fiscal front, collapse of currency under speculative attack and search for a nominal anchor within IMF programme. |
National Monetary Council (both Govt and central bank Governor)/ Yes |
Headline Broad National CPI/ 4.5 per cent +/-2 percentage point Yearly target. |
Inflation Report/ 4 times a year |
An overnight interest rate (SELIC ) |
|
|
Hungary |
June 2001 |
Increasing incompatibility of fixed exchange rate regime and disinflation; need to bring down inflation with future EU membership in mind |
Central bank/ Yes |
CPI/ 3 per cent per annum/ Medium-term. |
Quarterly Report on Inflation/ 4 times a year. |
Interest rate on 2-week central bank bond. |
|
|
Indonesia |
July 2005 |
The relationship
between monetary
aggregates and
nominal income
becoming tenuous
due to instability
in income velocity
of money following
financial deregulation
and less success with
exchange rate as
nominal anchor. |
Government
in consultation
with central
bank/
Yes. |
CPI /
4.5 per cent
+/-
1 percentage
point/
Mediumterm. |
Monetary
Policy
Report/
4 times a
year. |
BI rate. |
|
|
Israel |
Informally
in 1992;
full-fledged
from June
1997 |
Lock in disinflation
and define the slope
of the exchange rate
crawling peg. |
Government.
in consultation
with central
bank Governor/
Yes. |
CPI / Target
Range of 1- 3
per cent/
Within
2 years. |
Inflation
Report/
Twice a
year. |
Short-term
interest rate
(overnight
transactions
between
central bank
and banks). |
|
|
Mexico |
2001 |
Difficulty with
monetary targeting,
unreliability of
relationship between
monetary base and
inflation, and lack
of nominal anchor
to guide inflation
expectations. |
The Board of
Governors/
Yes. |
CPI / Multiannual
inflation
target
3 per cent
+/-1 per
cent/
Mediumterm. |
Inflation
Report/
4 times a
year. |
Overnight
inter-bank
rate. |
|
|
South
Africa |
February
2000 |
Following
liberalisation
and structural
developments,
changing relationship
between output, prices
and money growth,
making monetary
targeting less useful;
need for greater
transparency in policy. |
Government
in consultation
with central
bank/
Yes. |
CPI / A Target
range of 3-6
per cent/
On a
continuous
basis. |
Monetary
Policy
Review/
Twice a
year. |
Repo rate. |
|
|
Peru |
January
2002 |
Formalisation of
earlier regime; greater
transparency of policy. |
Target is
approved by
the Board of
Directors. |
CPI / 2 per
cent +/-1
percentage
point/
At all times. |
Inflation
Report/
4 times a
year. |
Reference
interest rate. |
|
|
Philippines |
January
2002 |
Formalisation and
simplification of
earlier regime;
greater transparency
and focus on price
stability. |
Government
in consultation
with central
bank/Yes. |
CPI / 4 per
cent +/- 1
percentage
point for
2012, 2013
and 2014/
Mediumterm. |
Inflation
Report/
4 times a
year |
Key Policy
interest
rates for
overnight
repo/ reverse
repo and
term repo/
reverse repo
and special
deposit
accounts. |
Target is
announced
2 years in
advance. |
|
Poland |
1998 |
Considered the most
effective way to
bring down inflation
as a precondition
for subsequent EU
membership. |
Monetary
Policy Council/
Yes. |
CPI / 2.5 per
cent +/- 1
percentage
points/
Mediumterm. |
Inflation
Report/
3 times a
year |
Reference
rate (the
rate that
determines
the yield on
the main
OMOs). |
|
|
South Korea |
April 1998 |
Unstable money
demand following
structural changes in
financial markets, and
with 1997 financial
crisis; discontinuation
of exchange rate. |
Central Bank
in consultation
with the Govt./
Yes. |
CPI / 3 per
cent +/- 1
percentage
point/
3 years. |
Monetary
Policy
Report/
Twice a
year. |
Bank of
Korea Base
rate. |
|
|
Thailand |
May 2000 |
Inflation targeting
considered more
appropriate with
floating exchange rate
than money supply
targeting after the
financial crisis of 1997. |
MPC in
consultation
with the Govt./
Yes. |
3.0 per cent
+/- 1.5
percentage
points/
8 quarters. |
Inflation
Report/
4 times a
year. |
One day
repo rate. |
Target is
set by MPC
annually.
The target
decided in
agreement
with the
Minister
of Finance,
which
then
requires
approval
by the
Cabinet. |
|
Turkey |
January
2006 |
|
MPC in
consultation
with the
Government. |
Annual CPI/
5 per
cent +/-2
percentage
points for
2012, 2013
and 2014/
Multi-year
horizon 3
years. |
Inflation
Report/
4 times a
year. |
One week
repo auction
rate. |
Interest
rate
corridor
and
required
reserve
ratios also
used as
policy
instruments. |
|
Source: 1. Petursson T. G. (2005): “Inflation Targeting and its Effects on Macroeconomic Performance”, SUERF studies: 2005/5
- The European Money and Finance Forum, Vienna.
2. Hammond G. (2012): “State of the Art of Inflation Targeting”, CCBS, Handbook No.29, Bank of England. |
Appendix Table II.4A: Individual Countries Inflation Targets |
Country |
Target Measure |
Target 2013 |
Target Type |
Armenia |
H CPI |
4% ± 1.5 pp |
P + T |
Australia |
H CPI |
2% - 3% |
Range |
Brazil |
H CPI |
4.5% ± 2 pp |
P + T |
Canada |
H CPI |
2% (mid-point of 1%-3%) |
P + T |
Chile |
H CPI |
3% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Colombia |
H CPI |
2% - 4% |
Range |
Czech Republic |
H CPI |
2% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Ghana |
H CPI |
9% ± 2 pp |
P + T |
Guatemala |
H CPI |
4% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Hungary |
H CPI |
3% |
Point |
Iceland |
H CPI |
2.5% |
Point |
Indonesia |
H CPI |
4.5% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Israel |
H CPI |
1% - 3% |
Range |
Mexico |
H CPI |
3% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
New Zealand |
H CPI |
1% - 3% |
Range |
Norway |
H CPI |
2.5% |
Point |
Peru |
H CPI |
2% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Phillippines |
H CPI |
4.0% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Poland |
H CPI |
2.5% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Romania |
H CPI |
2.5% ± 1 pp |
P + T |
Serbia |
H CPI |
4.0% ± 1.5 pp |
P + T |
South Africa |
H CPI |
3% - 6% |
Range |
South Korea |
H CPI |
2.5% - 3.5% |
Range |
Sweden |
H CPI |
2% |
Point |
Thailand |
Core Inflation |
0.5% - 3.0% |
Range |
Turkey |
H CPI |
5.0% ± 2 pp |
P + T |
United Kingdom |
H CPI |
2% |
Point |
H CPI - Headline CPI; P+ T - Point with tolerance; PP – Percentage point
Source: Hammond G. (2012);”State of the art of inflation targeting”, CCBS, Handbook - No.29, Bank of England and Website of Central Banks |
Appendix Table II.4B: Non-Inflation Targeting Countries |
Country |
Target Measure |
Desired level of Inflation |
US |
PCE |
< 2 % |
ECB |
H CPI |
Below but close to 2% |
Malaysia |
H CPI |
2% - 3% |
Singapore |
H CPI |
3% - 4% |
Russia |
H CPI |
5% - 6% |
China |
H CPI |
3.50% |
PCE: Personal Consumption Expenditure
Source: Website of Central Banks |
Appendix Table II.5: Time Horizon for attending Price Stability |
Inflation Targeting |
Non-inflation Targeting |
Country |
Time horizon |
Country |
Time horizon |
Armenia |
Medium term |
US |
Long-term |
Australia |
Medium term |
ECB |
Medium-term |
Brazil |
Yearly Target |
Malaysia |
Short-term |
Canada |
Six-eight quarters; current target extends to Dec.2016 |
Singapore |
Short-term |
Chile |
Around two years |
Russia |
Medium-term |
Colombia |
Medium term |
China |
Short-term |
Czech Republic |
Medium term,12-18 months |
|
|
Ghana |
18-24 months |
|
|
Guatemala |
End of year |
|
|
Hungary |
Medium term |
|
|
Iceland |
On average |
|
|
Indonesia |
Medium term |
|
|
Israel |
Within two years |
|
|
Mexico |
Medium term |
|
|
New Zealand |
Medium term |
|
|
Norway |
Medium term |
|
|
Peru |
At all times |
|
|
Philippines |
Medium term(from 2012-14) |
|
|
Poland |
Medium term |
|
|
Romania |
Medium term target from 2013 |
|
|
Serbia |
Medium term |
|
|
South Africa |
On a continuous basis |
|
|
South Korea |
Three years |
|
|
Sweden |
Normally two years |
|
|
Thailand |
Eight quarters |
|
|
Turkey |
Multi year(Three years) |
|
|
United Kingdom |
At all times |
|
|
Source: Hammond G. (2012);”State of the art of inflation targeting”, CCBS, Handbook - No.29, Bank of England and Website of Central Banks |
Appendix Table II.6A: Communication and Transparency Practices in Inflation Targeting Countries |
Country |
Open
letter |
Parliamentary
hearings? |
Press Notice/
Conference |
Minutes |
Votes |
Inflation |
Frequency |
Armenia |
No |
Yes, annual |
PR |
Yes, within ten days |
No |
Yes |
4 |
Australia |
No |
Yes, twice yearly |
Notice |
Yes, after two weeks |
n/a |
Yes |
4 |
Brazil |
Yes |
Yes, six per year |
PR + PC for IR |
Yes, after eight days |
Balance of votes |
Yes |
4 |
Canada |
No |
Yes, twice yearly |
PR + PC for IR |
No |
n/a |
Yes |
4 |
Chile |
|
Yes, four times per year |
PR |
Yes, after two weeks |
yes |
Yes |
4 |
Colombia |
No |
Yes, twice yearly |
PR + PC for IR |
Yes, after two weeks |
Majority/unanimous |
Yes |
4 |
Czech Republic |
No |
No (Report) |
PR + PC for IR |
Yes, after eight days |
Yes |
Yes |
4 |
Ghana |
No |
No |
PR + PC |
No |
n/a |
Yes |
4 to 6 |
Guatemala |
No |
Yes, twice yearly |
PR + PC |
Yes, after four weeks |
no |
Yes |
3 |
Hungary |
No |
Yes, once a year |
PC |
Yes |
yes |
Yes |
4 |
Iceland |
Yes |
Yes, twice yearly |
PR + PC |
Yes |
Balance of votes |
Yes |
2 plus2 |
Indonesia |
No |
No |
PR |
No |
n/a |
Yes |
4 |
Israel |
No |
Yes, twice yearly |
PR |
Yes, after two weeks |
Balance of votes |
Yes |
2 |
Mexico |
No |
Yes, not regular |
PR |
Yes, after two weeks |
n/a |
Yes |
4 |
New Zealand |
Other |
Yes, four times a year |
PR + PC for IR |
No |
n/a |
Yes |
4 |
Norway |
No |
Yes |
PR + PC |
No |
n/a |
Yes |
3 |
Peru |
No |
Yes, once a year |
Teleconference |
No |
No |
Yes |
4 |
Phillippines |
Yes |
No |
PR + PC |
Yes, after four weeks |
No |
Yes |
4 |
Poland |
No |
No(a) |
PR + PC |
Yes, after three weeks |
Yes in IR |
Yes |
4 |
Romania |
No |
No |
PR + PC for IR |
No |
No |
Yes |
4 |
Serbia |
Yes |
No(b) |
PR + PC |
No |
No |
Yes |
4 |
South Africa |
No |
Yes, at least three per year |
PR + PC |
No |
n/a |
Yes |
2 |
South Korea |
No |
Yes |
PR + PC |
Yes, after six weeks |
No |
Yes |
2 |
Sweden |
No |
Yes, twice yearly |
PR |
Yes, after two weeks |
Yes |
Yes |
3 plus3 |
Thailand |
Yes |
No |
PR + PC |
Yes, after two weeks |
Balance of votes |
Yes |
4 |
Turkey |
Yes |
Yes, twice yearly |
PR |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
4 |
United Kingdom |
Yes |
Yes, three per year |
PR + PC for IR |
Yes, after two weeks |
Yes |
Yes |
4 |
IR: Inflation Report. PC: Press Conference PR: Press Release.
(a) Governor reports to Lower House once a year on Monetary Policy in preceding year.
(b) Governor explains reports to National Assembly.
Source: Hammond G. (2012);”State of the art of inflation targeting”, CCBS, Handbook - No.29, Bank of England and Website of
Central Banks |
Appendix Table II.6B: Communication and Transparency Practices in Non-inflation Targeting Countries |
Country |
Press Notice/ Conference |
Minutes of Monetary Policy Meeting |
Inflation Projection |
Other Publications |
US |
PR + PC |
Yes, within twenty days |
2 years ahead |
|
ECB |
PR + PC |
No |
N.A. |
|
Malaysia |
PR |
No |
One Year |
Outlook and Policy (annual) |
Singapore |
PR |
No |
One year |
Macroeconomic Review (twice a year) |
Russia |
PR |
No |
N.A. |
Guidelines for Single State Monetary Policy, Monetary Policy Report |
China |
PR |
No |
One year |
Quarterly Monetary Policy Report |
PR: Press Release; PC: Press Conference.
Source: Website of Central Banks. |
Appendix Table III.1: Monetary Policy Framework - International Experience |
Country/ Central Bank |
Decision making by |
Policy objective |
Monetary policy target |
Key policy rate |
Standing Facility |
Reserve requirements |
Market operations |
United States (Federal Reserve System) |
Federal Open Market Committee |
Promote price stability and maximum sustainable employment |
Maximum employment and 2 per cent inflation* |
Uncollateralised interbank rate |
Primary Credit Facility. No Deposit facility** |
Yes |
Yes |
United Kingdom (Bank of England) |
Monetary Policy Committee |
To maintain price stability and to support the objectives for growth and employment |
An inflation targeting framework |
The official Bank Rate paid on commercial bank reserves |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Brazil (Central Bank of Brazil) |
Monetary Policy Committee |
Achievement of inflation targets set by the Government |
An inflation targeting framework |
Interest rate on overnight interbank loans |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Canada (Bank of Canada) |
Governing Council |
Contributing to sustained economic growth, rising levels of employment and improved living standards |
An inflation targeting framework |
Interest rate on collateralized market-based overnight transactions |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
*: In its recent policy announcements, the Fed has indicated that their assessment suggests that it will be appropriate to maintain the
current target range for the Federal Funds rate well past the time that the unemployment rate declines below 6.5 per cent, especially if
projected inflation continues to run below the committee’s 2 per cent longer-run goal.
** In 2008, the Fed started paying interest on required and excess reserves, to avoid downward pressures on the Fed Funds rate. |
(Contd...) |
Appendix Table III.1: Monetary Policy Framework - International Experience (Concld.) |
Country/ Central Bank |
Decision making by |
Policy objective |
Monetary policy target |
Key policy rate |
Standing Facility |
Reserve requirements |
Market operations |
Euro area (European System of Central Banks) |
Governing Council |
To maintain price stability |
Inflation below but close to 2 per cent over medium-term |
Minimum bid rate in main refinancing operations |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Australia (Reserve Bank of Australia) |
Reserve Bank Board |
Achievement of inflation target |
An inflation targeting framework |
Target cash rate |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Japan (Bank of Japan) |
The Policy Board |
Multiple objectives |
2 per cent inflation |
Uncollateralized overnight call rate |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Singapore (Monetary
Authority of
Singapore) |
Monetary and
Investment
Policy |
Price stability
for sustainable
economic
growth |
Price stability
for sustainable
economic
growth |
Exchange rate |
Yes |
Yes |
Exchange
intervention |
Mexico
(Bank of
Mexico) |
Board of
Governors |
Achievement of
price stability |
An inflation
targeting
framework |
Target for the
interbank
overnight
funding rate |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Switzerland
(Swiss National
Bank) |
Governing
Board |
Price stability |
Price stability |
CHF 3-month
Libor |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Sweden
(Riksbank) |
Executive Board |
Maintain price
stability |
An inflation
targeting
framework |
Repo rate |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Korea
(Bank of Korea) |
Monetary Policy
Committee |
Price stability |
An inflation
targeting
framework |
The Bank of
Korea Base Rate |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Appendix Table III.2: Standing Facilities, Main Liquidity Operations and Other Discretionary
Operations of Some Major Central Banks |
Country |
Bank Reserve |
Standing Facility |
Main Liquidity Operation |
Other discretionary |
Counter party |
Req. |
Avg. |
Loan |
Deposit |
Tenor |
Instrument(s) |
Tenor |
Freq. |
Instrument |
Tenor |
Collateral |
Lending Operations |
Australia |
N |
- |
Y |
Y |
Overnight |
Repo/ Rev. repo |
1 day to 12 months |
daily |
Outright / Fx-Swap / term deposit |
1 day to 3 month |
discretion |
Wide |
Brazil |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Two Days |
Repo/ Rev. repo |
1-30 days |
daily |
Outright operation; non-standardized, non-regular |
no discretion |
|
Canada |
N |
- |
Y |
Y |
Overnight |
OMO / Intraday through special purchase and Resale |
daily |
|
collateral includes US treasury bills, notes and bonds, list of treasure were expanded during the crisis |
OMO for PDs, SF for Payment and settlement system participants |
Euro Area |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Overnight |
Collateralized
Credit |
variable |
weekly/
monthly |
OMO and Intraday
credit |
the Governing
council has the
discretion to expand |
Wide in terms
of both type and
participants |
Hong Kong
SAR |
N |
- |
Y |
|
Overnight |
Two way convertibility undertaking |
|
all exchange fund
bill and notes,
extended to use US
Treasuries under
discount window |
|
Japan |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Fixed
Term |
Repo
(short run) |
overnight
to 1 year |
2-3
times a
day |
OMO |
|
Japan Government
Bonds / CPs; Law
generally limits
expanding collateral |
Wide but varies with
facilities |
Korea |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Overnight |
Repo/Rev.
repo (issuer
/ redemption
of money
stabilisation
bonds) |
7 days |
weekly |
Additional
repos |
1-3
days |
Bank of Korea act
gives the bank
discretion to extend
loan against the
collateral of any
asset. |
Narrow for OMO,
wide for SF |
– : Not applicable. |
(Contd...) |
Appendix Table III.2: Standing Facilities, Main Liquidity Operations and Other Discretionary Operations of
Some Major Central Banks (Concld.) |
Country |
Bank Reserve |
Standing Facility |
Main Liquidity Operation |
Other discretionary |
Counter party |
Req. |
Avg. |
Loan |
Deposit |
Tenor |
Instrument(s) |
Tenor |
Freq. |
Instrument |
Tenor |
Collateral |
Lending Operations |
Mexico |
N |
|
Y |
Y |
Overnight |
Open market operation |
1-25 days |
daily |
Long term sterilisation of excess liquidity/ sporadic use of compulsory deposit |
central bank has the discretion to expand other type of collaterals |
OMO for all local
banks, SF for private
sector banks only |
Singapore |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Overnight |
Exchange rate
intervention |
FS- spot |
discretionary |
Repo /
Fx-swap
direct lending/ borrowing |
Up to 1
year |
MAS has the
discretion to expand
collateral |
PD only for OMO,
all RTGS
participants for SF |
Sweden |
N |
|
Y |
Y |
Overnight |
Repo /
Riksbank
certificate |
1 week |
|
loan /
deposit |
Overnight |
Act allows expansion
of collateral |
Wide |
Switzerland |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Overnight |
Open market
operation /repo
/SNB Bills |
Mostly
one week |
daily |
Injection /
absorption
through
auctions |
Mostly
overnight |
SNB has discretion
on collateral |
Wide in terms
of type |
UK |
Voluntary |
Y |
Y |
|
Overnight |
Short term (fixed rate) long
term (variable rate repo
operation) |
weekly /
monthly |
Sterling Financing
through OMO |
broad based security
for discount window |
Varies with facilitybanks
for liquidity |
USA |
Y |
Y |
|
Primary Credit |
Generally
Overnight |
repo |
up to 65
days |
daily /
weekly |
OMO |
variable |
Under exceptional
situation |
PDs only OMOs;
wide for SF |
Source: BIS Markets Committee several publications, web-sites of central banks, Narrow=restricted for select few institutions (wide otherwise); Y=yes, N=No,
PD=primary dealers, SF =Standing liquidity facility. |
Appendix Table III.3: Deregulation of Interest Rates in India |
Deposit Rates* |
Lending Rate |
Saving Deposit |
Term Deposit |
Effective from |
Restrictions and Regulations Prescribed |
Month & Year |
Restrictions and Regulations Prescribed |
Month & Year |
Restrictions and Regulations Prescribed |
July 1, 1977 |
3 per cent (chequeble deposits) and 5 per cent (non- chequeable) |
Apr. 1985 |
Banks were allowed to set interest rates for maturities between 15 days and up to 1 year, subject to a ceiling of 8 per cent. |
March 1981 |
A broad framework of interest rates was provided with fixed rates on certain types of advances and ceiling rate on other types of advances. |
March 2,
1978 |
4.5 per cent, uniformly |
May 1985 |
Freedom to set interest rates accorded in April 1965 was withdrawn. |
October
1988 |
Fixed rate stipulations converted
into floor rates with option to banks to raise the rates. |
April
24,1992 |
6.0 per cent |
Oct. 1989 |
Domestic short term deposits of
maturity 46 days to 90 days and 90
days to one year merged together
with uniform interest rate payable,
effective October 11, 1989. |
September
1990 |
Discontinuation of sector-specific
and programme-specific interest rate stipulations, barring a few areas like agriculture, small industries, differential rate of interest (DRI) scheme and export credit. Linking interest rate to the size of the loan (over `2 lakh) was introduced. |
July 1,1993 |
5.0 per cent |
Apr. 1992 |
Replacement of maturity-wise ceiling rates by a single ceiling rate of 13 per cent on all deposits above 46 days. |
April 1992 |
The interest rates of SCBs (except
DRI advances and export credit) were rationalized by bringing the six slabs of advances to four slabs according to size of credit. |
November
1, 1994 |
4.5 per cent |
Nov. 1994 |
Ceiling rate was brought down to 10
per cent. |
April 1993 |
L ending rates were further
rationalized as the number of slabs
was brought down from four
categories to three categories by
merging the first two slabs. |
April 1,
2000 |
4.0 per cent |
Apr. 1995 |
Ceiling rate raised to 12 per cent. |
October
1994 |
Lending rates for credit limit of over
`2 lakh were deregulated. Banks
were required to declare their Prime
Lending Rates (PLRs). |
March 1,
2003 |
3.5 per cent |
Oct. 1995 |
Interest rates on deposits with
maturity of over two years were
freed. |
October
1995 |
Interest rate on advances against
term deposits of `2 lakh and above
for both domestic and NRE deposits
were deregulated. |
May 3,
2011 |
4.0 per cent |
Jul. 1996 |
Freedom to set rates for term deposit
above one year maturity. Minimum
period of term deposit brought down
from 46 days to 30 days. For the
maturity bucket of 30 days to 1 year,
banks could fix interest rates subject
to a ceiling. |
February
1997 |
Banks allowed to prescribe PLRs and
spreads separately for loan and cash
credit components of loans. |
Oct 25,
2011 |
Deregulation subject to
conditions. |
Apr. 1997 |
Ceiling interest rate on domestic
term deposits of maturity of 30 days
and up to 1 year was linked to Bank
Rate |
October
1997 |
For term loans of 3 years and above,
separate Prime Term Lending Rates
(PTLRs) were required to be
announced by banks. |
|
|
Oct.1997 |
Term deposit rates were fully
deregulated. |
April 1998 |
PLR converted as a ceiling rate on
loans up to `2 lakh. |
|
|
Apr.1998 |
Freedom to offer differential interest
rate for bulk deposits of `15 lakh and
above. Freedom to set own penal
interest rates on premature
withdrawal of domestic term
deposits. Minimum period of
maturity of term deposits reduced
from 30 days to 15 days. |
April 1999 |
Banks were provided freedom to
operate tenor linked PLR. |
|
|
Apr. 2001 |
Minimum maturity period of 15 days
reduced to 7 days for wholesale
deposits of `15 lakh and above. |
October
1999 |
Flexibility to charge interest rates
without reference to the PLR on
certain categories of loans/credit. |
|
|
Nov. 2004 |
Minimum maturity period of 15 days
reduced to 7 days for all deposits. |
April 2000 |
Banks allowed to charge fixed/
floating rate on their lending for
credit limit of over `2 lakh. |
|
|
Jan.2013 |
Banks were permitted to offer
differential deposit rates for bulk
deposits of `1 crore and above. |
April 2001 |
Commercial banks allowed to lend
at sub-PLR rate for loans above `2
lakh. |
|
|
|
|
April 2003 |
Tenor linked PLR system replaced by
Benchmark Prime Lending Rate
(BPLR). |
|
|
|
|
July 2010 |
Introduction of Base Rate System,
which serves as the floor rate for
almost all types of advances. |
*: The regulation that no interest may be paid on current deposits continues till date. |
Appendix Table III.4: Money Demand Estimates |
M3 deflated by GDP deflator
Rolling Reg Output: Log(real money) , log(rgdp), call rate (i) with 15-year window |
|
start |
end |
lrgdp |
t-stat |
Call Rate |
t-stat |
Constant |
t-stat |
1 |
1991 |
2005 |
1.57 |
18.5 |
0.00 |
0.3 |
-10.75 |
-12.3 |
2 |
1992 |
2006 |
1.58 |
21.7 |
0.00 |
0.3 |
-10.85 |
-14.4 |
3 |
1993 |
2007 |
1.57 |
28.1 |
0.00 |
-0.4 |
-10.79 |
-18.5 |
4 |
1994 |
2008 |
1.58 |
35.4 |
-0.01 |
-1.2 |
-10.80 |
-23.1 |
5 |
1995 |
2009 |
1.59 |
35.7 |
0.00 |
-0.9 |
-10.94 |
-23.1 |
6 |
1996 |
2010 |
1.60 |
35.1 |
0.00 |
-0.6 |
-11.05 |
-22.7 |
7 |
1997 |
2011 |
1.52 |
29.3 |
-0.01 |
-1.2 |
-10.23 |
-17.8 |
8 |
1998 |
2012 |
1.44 |
34.6 |
-0.02 |
-2.6 |
-9.34 |
-20.5 |
9 |
1999 |
2013 |
1.40 |
37.2 |
-0.02 |
-3.1 |
-8.89 |
-21.9 |
M3 deflated by WPI Index
Rolling Reg Output: Log(real money) , log(rgdp), call rate (i) with 15-year window |
|
start |
end |
lrgdp |
t-stat |
Call Rate |
t-stat |
Constant |
t-stat |
1 |
1991 |
2005 |
1.59 |
23.1 |
0.00 |
0.1 |
-10.94 |
-15.4 |
2 |
1992 |
2006 |
1.58 |
26.6 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
-10.83 |
-17.6 |
3 |
1993 |
2007 |
1.56 |
36.1 |
0.00 |
-1.2 |
-10.61 |
-23.5 |
4 |
1994 |
2008 |
1.56 |
44.9 |
-0.01 |
-2.0 |
-10.59 |
-29.0 |
5 |
1995 |
2009 |
1.56 |
44.0 |
-0.01 |
-1.8 |
-10.61 |
-28.1 |
6 |
1996 |
2010 |
1.55 |
40.4 |
-0.01 |
-1.6 |
-10.55 |
-25.6 |
7 |
1997 |
2011 |
1.51 |
34.4 |
-0.01 |
-1.0 |
-10.05 |
-20.7 |
8 |
1998 |
2012 |
1.42 |
45.3 |
-0.02 |
-2.9 |
-9.13 |
-26.6 |
9 |
1999 |
2013 |
1.39 |
49.7 |
-0.02 |
-3.5 |
-8.73 |
-29.1 |
M3 deflated by GDP deflator
Rolling Reg Output: Log(real money) , log(rgdp), WALR with 15-year window |
|
start |
end |
lrgdp |
t-stat |
WALR |
t-stat |
Constant |
t-stat |
1 |
1991 |
2005 |
1.54 |
31.5 |
0.00 |
-1.0 |
-10.44 |
-21.6 |
2 |
1992 |
2006 |
1.15 |
16.1 |
-0.07 |
-6.1 |
-5.60 |
-6.5 |
3 |
1993 |
2007 |
1.18 |
14.6 |
-0.06 |
-5.3 |
-5.89 |
-6.0 |
4 |
1994 |
2008 |
1.30 |
16.8 |
-0.05 |
-4.2 |
-7.28 |
-7.7 |
5 |
1995 |
2009 |
1.32 |
17.1 |
-0.05 |
-4.0 |
-7.54 |
-8.0 |
6 |
1996 |
2010 |
1.33 |
13.5 |
-0.04 |
-3.0 |
-7.74 |
-6.4 |
7 |
1997 |
2011 |
1.23 |
14.9 |
-0.06 |
-4.4 |
-6.45 |
-6.3 |
8 |
1998 |
2012 |
1.24 |
22.7 |
-0.06 |
-5.2 |
-6.63 |
-9.5 |
9 |
1999 |
2013 |
1.22 |
26.4 |
-0.06 |
-5.5 |
-6.34 |
-10.5 |
WALR: Weighted Avereage Lending Rate. |
Appendix Table III.5: Access to Liquidity Under Refinance Facilities |
15-Apr-1997 |
A general refinance facility was introduced effective from April 26, 1997 under which all SCBs (expect RRBs) were provided General Refinance equivalent to 1 per cent of each bank's forthightly average outstanding aggregate deposits in 1996-97 in two blocks of 4 weeks each at Bank rate for the first block of 4 weeks and Bank rate plus one percentage point for second block of 4 weeks. |
15-Apr-1997 |
From April 26, 1997 the base level ECR limit at 20 per cent of export credit as on Feb. 16, 1996 was withdrawn and SCBs were provided ECR only to the extent of 100 per cent of the increase in outstanding export credit eligible for refinance over the level of such credit as on Feb. 16, 1996. Interest rate was retained at 11 per cent (i.e., the Bank Rate). |
16-Jan-1998 |
Effective from Jan 17, 1998 the ECR limit was lowered to 50 per cent of the increase in outstanding export credit eligible for refinance over the level of such credit as on Feb. 16, 1996, in order to reduce the access to liquidity in the context of measures announced relating to foreign exchange market. |
16-Jan-1998 |
Access to General Refinance Facility was reduced to equivalent to 0.25 per cent of forthightly average outstanding aggregate deposits in 1996-97. |
15-Apr-1998 |
General Refinance Facility was closed (effective from April 20, 1998). |
29-Apr-1998 |
Export Credit Refinance Limit was raised to 100 per cent (effective from May 9, 1998). |
19-Apr-2001 |
With effect from May 5, 2001 SCBs were provided ECR to the extent of 15 per cent of the outstanding export credit eligible for refinance as at the second preceding fortnight. |
3-Nov-2008 |
A special refinance facility was introduced under which all SCBs (excluding RRBs) were provided refinance (which could be flexibly drawn and repaid) from the Reserve Bank equivalent to up to 1.0 per cent of each bank’s NDTL as on October 24, 2008 at the LAF repo rate up to a maximum period of 90 days. |
18-May-2004 |
ECR made available at the Reverse Repo Rate. |
15-Nov-2008 |
Eligible limit for ECR facility increased from 15 per cent to 50 per cent of outstanding export credit eligible for refinance. |
6-Dec-2008 |
Refinance facility of `7,000 crore was provided to SIDBI at the Repo Rate. This facility was available up to March 31, 2010 |
11-Dec-2008 |
Refinance facility of `4,000 crore was provided to the National Housing Bank at the Repo Rate. This facility was available up to March 31, 2010 |
11-Dec-2008 |
Refinance facility of `5,000 crore was provided to the EXIM Bank at the Repo Rate. This facility was available up to March 31, 2013. |
27-Oct-2009 |
The special refinance facility introduced on November 03, 2008 was closed. |
27-Oct-2009 |
Eligible limit of ECR facility reduced from 50 per cent of the outstanding rupee export credit eligible for refinance to 15 per cent. |
18-Jun-2012 |
Export Credit Refinance limit increased to 50 per cent from 15 per cent of eligible outstanding export credit. |
14-Jan-2013 |
INR-USD swap facility with the Reserve Bank was provided to SCBs (except RRBs) to support incremental Pre-shipment export credit in foreign currency, with the option to access rupee refinance to the extent of swap with the RBI under Special Export Credit Refinance Facility (SECRF). The scheme was closed on June 28, 2013. |
18-Nov-2013 |
Refinance facility of `5,000 crore was provided to SIDBI . This refinance facility is be available up to November 13, 2014. |
Appendix Table III.6: CPI-Combined |
(back-casted series*) |
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
2001 |
55.5 |
55.4 |
55.7 |
56.1 |
56.5 |
57.1 |
57.8 |
58.2 |
58.0 |
58.6 |
59.0 |
58.8 |
2002 |
58.6 |
58.5 |
58.9 |
59.2 |
59.6 |
60.2 |
60.8 |
61.1 |
61.2 |
61.5 |
61.7 |
61.3 |
2003 |
61.2 |
61.4 |
61.8 |
62.7 |
62.8 |
63.0 |
63.5 |
63.1 |
63.2 |
63.7 |
63.8 |
63.7 |
2004 |
63.8 |
63.8 |
63.9 |
64.1 |
64.6 |
65.1 |
65.6 |
66.2 |
66.3 |
66.8 |
66.6 |
66.1 |
2005 |
66.6 |
66.6 |
66.6 |
67.1 |
66.7 |
66.8 |
67.9 |
68.1 |
68.2 |
68.8 |
69.5 |
69.2 |
2006 |
69.3 |
69.3 |
69.3 |
70.0 |
70.9 |
71.9 |
72.3 |
72.8 |
73.3 |
74.2 |
74.2 |
73.9 |
2007 |
73.9 |
74.1 |
74.1 |
74.8 |
75.2 |
75.8 |
76.9 |
77.2 |
77.3 |
77.9 |
78.0 |
78.0 |
2008 |
78.1 |
78.6 |
79.7 |
80.7 |
80.8 |
81.9 |
83.3 |
84.3 |
85.1 |
86.7 |
86.7 |
85.5 |
2009 |
85.9 |
85.8 |
86.1 |
87.0 |
87.9 |
88.9 |
92.0 |
92.9 |
93.6 |
94.6 |
96.5 |
96.7 |
2010 |
97.4 |
96.5 |
96.3 |
97.0 |
97.8 |
99.0 |
101.3 |
101.4 |
102.3 |
102.9 |
103.5 |
104.7 |
2011 |
105.9 |
105.3 |
105.6 |
106.2 |
107.1 |
108.8 |
110.5 |
111.7 |
113.0 |
113.8 |
114.1 |
113.6 |
2012 |
114.0 |
114.6 |
115.5 |
117.1 |
118.2 |
119.6 |
121.4 |
122.9 |
124.0 |
124.9 |
125.4 |
125.6 |
2013 |
126.3 |
127.1 |
127.5 |
128.1 |
129.2 |
131.4 |
133.1 |
134.6 |
136.2 |
137.5 |
139.5 |
138.0 |
*The new series of Consumer Price Index-Combined (CPI-C) (Base: 2010=100) is available on a monthly basis from January-2011. For the purpose of empirical analysis in this Report, back-casted data had to be generated, and the data presented here should not be seen as an official price index. The back-casted series of CPI-C was generated by using the price indices of Consumer Price Index-Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) (Base: 2001=100) and applying the corresponding weighting diagram of CPI-C at sub-group level, with some minor adjustments. |
Appendix Table V.1: Measures Aimed at Managing the Impact of Taper Talk |
Country |
Key Policy Rate Hikes |
Key Policy Rate Cuts |
Liquidity Measures |
FX intervention |
FX swaps |
Capital account management |
Macro-prudential measures |
Indonesia |
Rates were hiked in several stages by 175 bps. |
|
Assurance to provide domestic liquidity. |
Assurance to provide domestic liquidity. |
Yes Also a special swap line with Bank of Korea. |
Allowed more mineral exports; easing of holding period restrictions to attract inflows. |
Bank Indonesia Deposit Certificates added as a component of Secondary Statutory Reserves; LTV on property loans raised. |
Thailand |
|
Cut overnight repo rate by 25 bps to 2.5% on May 29, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
South Korea |
|
|
|
Yes |
Swap line with Bank Indonesia. |
|
|
Turkey |
|
|
Cut required reserve ratios on forex deposits to boost market liquidity. |
Tried using forex intervention for monetary policy goals, but this could not contain inflation. |
|
Doubled the amount of reserves that banks are allowed to keep in foreign currency. |
Forex reserve ratio requirement was increased. |
Russia |
|
|
Undertook liquidity
management reforms.
Introduced 1-week
term repos as the main
instrument. 1-day repo
to be discontinued
from Feb.1, 2014. Will
start using 1-6 day
repo as fine-tuning
operations. Introduced
standing facility. |
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
Hiked Selic rate
150 bps from
8.0% to 9.5%
during May-Oct.
2013. Earlier
it had raised
Selic rate 75 bps
during Jan-April
2013. |
|
|
On Aug.24
US$54 bn
Intervention
Plan
announced
after 15%
depreciation
of real in
three months.
Included
weekly
auction of
US$1 bn dollar
loans. |
US$0.5 bn of
forex swaps
four days a
week. Real
appreciated
7.7% during
Sept-Oct.
2013 aided by
intervention
plan but
raised the
cost of its
continuation.
However, on
Nov. 8, the
central bank
announced
rollover of
swaps thus
increasing its
intervention. |
Relaxed capital
inflows.
Scrapped
the 6% IOF
on foreign
portfolio
inflows into
fixed income
investments. |
|
Appendix Table V.2: Monetary Measures to Address Exchange Market Pressures |
Asian crisis of 1997-98 |
Rate Measures |
Increase in Bank Rate (to 11 per cent) and reverse repo rate (to 9 per cent) by two percentage points each on January 16, 1998. Increase in interest rate surcharge on bank credit for imports to 30 per cent on January 16, 1998.
Hike in the interest rate on post-shipment rupee export credit beyond 90 days and up to 6 months from 13 per cent to 15 per cent on November 26, 1997 (a brief period of stability in end-December led to withdrawal of the hike from January 1, 1998).
On December 17, 1997 it was stipulated that the minimum interest rate of 20 per cent per annum to be charged on overdue export bills. An interest rate surcharge of 15 per cent on import credit was also announced. |
Quantity Measures |
CRR was raised twice in December 1997 (by 50 bps to 10 per cent and the incremental 10 per cent CRR on NRE and NRNR deposit schemes was withdrawn) and January 1998 (by 50 bps to 10.5 per cent). This was intended to absorb excess liquidity and remove the arbitrage on account of low rates in the call money market and the potential gains in the foreign exchange market.
Reduction in access to refinance facilities (general refinance limit reduced from 1.0 per cent to 0.25 per cent of fortnightly average outstanding aggregate deposits in 1996-97 and export refinance limit reduced from 100 per cent to 50 per cent of the increase in outstanding export credit over February 16, 1996). |
Global financial crisis of 2008-09 |
Rate Measures |
Cut in the repo rate under the LAF by a cumulative 425 bps from 9.0 per cent to 4.75 per cent.
Cut in the reverse repo rate by a cumulative 275 bps from 6.0 per cent to 3.25 per cent.
The ceiling rate on export credit in foreign currency increased to LIBOR plus 350 bps.
Cumulative increase in the interest rate ceilings on FCNR(B) and NR(E)RA term deposits by 175 bps each since September 16, 2008. |
Quantity Measures |
Cut in the CRR by a cumulative 400 bps of NDTL from 9.0 per cent to 5.0 per cent.
Introduction of a special refinance facility up to March 31, 2010 under which all SCBs (excluding RRBs) provided refinance from the
Reserve Bank equivalent to 1.0 per cent of each bank’s NDTL as on October 24, 2008.
Term repo facility under the LAF to enable banks to ease liquidity stress faced by mutual funds, NBFCs and housing finance
companies (HFCs) with associated SLR exemption of 1.5 per cent of NDTL. This facility is available up to March 31, 2010.
Reduction in statutory liquidity ratio (SLR) from 25 per cent to 24 per cent of NDTL with effect from the fortnight beginning
November 8, 2008.
Introduction of a mechanism to buyback dated securities issued under the MSS.
Extension of the period of entitlement by 90 days of the first slab of pre-shipment and post-shipment rupee export credit with effect
from November 15, 2008 and November 28, 2008, respectively.
Increase in the eligible limit of the ECR facility for scheduled banks (excluding RRBs) from 15 per cent to 50 per cent of the
outstanding export credit eligible for refinance.
In order to provide liquidity support to housing, export and MSE sectors, RBI provided a refinance facility to NHB, EXIM Bank and
SIDBI up to March 2010.
Scope of OMO widened by including purchases of government securities through an auction-based mechanism.
Special market operations to meet the foreign exchange requirements of public sector oil marketing companies against oil bonds.
HFCs registered with the NHB were allowed to raise short-term foreign currency borrowings under the approval route, subject to
compliance with prudential norms laid down by the NHB.
ADs allowed to borrow funds from their head office, overseas branches and correspondents and overdrafts in nostro accounts up to
a limit of 50 per cent of their unimpaired Tier 1 capital or US$ 10 million, whichever was higher.
A foreign exchange swap facility with tenure up to three months to Indian public and private sector banks having overseas operations
in order to provide them flexibility in managing their short-term funding requirements at their overseas offices.
Systemically important non-deposit taking NBFCs were permitted to raise short-term foreign currency borrowings under the
approval route, subject to compliance with the prudential requirements of capital adequacy and exposure norms. |
Exchange market pressures since May 22 in response to talk of tapering |
Rate
Measures |
MSF was raised by 200 bps to 10.25 per cent (reversed by October 29, 2013).
Interest rate ceiling on NRI deposits of 3-5 years maturity was increased by 100 bps to LIBOR/SWAP plus 400 bps.
The ceiling on interest rate on NRE deposits removed. |
Quantity
Measures |
Restriction on the overall access to LAF to 0.5 per cent of each bank’s NDTL.
OMO sales of `25 billion.
CRR, which banks had to maintain on a fortnightly average basis subject to a daily minimum requirement of 70 per cent, was modified requiring banks to maintain a daily minimum of 99 per cent of the requirement (reduced later to 95 per cent).
Auction of CMBs on a weekly basis of a notified amount of `220 billion for a few weeks.
With effect from fortnight beginning August 24, 2013, incremental FCNR (B) and NRE deposits, of three year and above maturity,
were exempted from maintenance of CRR and SLR. This measure was announced to give impetus to banks to mop up NRI deposits
of long-term maturity.
On August 28, 2013, a forex swap window was opened to meet the entire daily dollar requirements of three public sector oil
marketing companies.
On September 4 2013, RBI opened a special concessional window for swapping fresh FCNR(B) dollar deposits, mobilised for a
minimum tenor of three years and above at a fixed rate of 3.5 per cent per annum for the tenor of the deposit (up to November 30,
2013).
The existing overseas borrowing limit of 50 per cent of the unimpaired Tier I capital was also raised to 100 per cent and the
borrowings mobilised could be swapped with RBI at a concessional rate of 100 bps below the ongoing swap rate prevailing in the
market (up to November 30, 2013). |
Appendix Table V.3: Counter-Cyclical Prudential Regulation: Variations in
Risk Weights and Provisioning Requirements |
Date |
Capital Market |
Housing |
Other Retails |
Commercial Real Estate |
Non-Deposit taking Systemically Important Non-Banking Financial Companies |
Risk |
Provisions |
Risk |
Provisions |
Risk |
Provisions |
Risk |
Provisions |
Risk |
Provisions |
Weight |
(%) |
Weight |
(%) |
Weight |
(%) |
Weight |
(%) |
Weight |
(%) |
Dec-2004 |
100 |
0.25 |
75 |
0.25 |
125 |
0.25 |
100 |
0.25 |
100 |
0.25 |
Jul-2005 |
125 |
0.25 |
75 |
0.25 |
125 |
0.25 |
125 |
0.25 |
100 |
0.25 |
Nov-2005 |
125 |
0.40 |
75 |
0.40 |
125 |
0.40 |
125 |
0.40 |
100 |
0.40 |
May-2006 |
125 |
1.00 |
75 |
1.00 |
125 |
1.00 |
150 |
1.00 |
100 |
0.40 |
Jan-2007 |
125 |
2.00 |
75 |
1.00 |
125 |
2.00 |
150 |
2.00 |
125 |
2.00 |
May-2007 |
125 |
2.00 |
50-75 |
1.00 |
125 |
2.00 |
150 |
2.00 |
125 |
2.00 |
May-2008 |
125 |
2.00 |
50-100 |
1.00 |
125 |
2.00 |
150 |
2.00 |
125 |
2.00 |
Nov-2008 |
125 |
0.40 |
50-100 |
0.40 |
125 |
0.40 |
100 |
0.40 |
100 |
0.40 |
Nov-2009 |
125 |
0.40 |
50-100 |
0.40 |
125 |
0.40 |
100 |
1.00 |
100 |
0.40 |
Dec-2010 |
125 |
0.40 |
50-125 |
0.4-2.0# |
125 |
0.40 |
100 |
1.00 |
100 |
0.40 |
Jul-2011 |
125 |
0.40 |
50-125 |
0.4-2.0 |
125 |
0.40 |
100 |
1.00 |
100 |
0.40 |
Jul-2012 |
125 |
0.40 |
50-125 |
0.4-2.0 |
125 |
0.40 |
100 |
1.00 |
100 |
0.40 |
Jul-2013 |
125 |
0.40 |
50-75* |
0.4-2.0 |
125 |
0.40 |
100@ |
1.00 |
100 |
0.40 |
* The risk weights for housing loans vary according to amount of the loan and the loan-to-value ratio as below.
# Provisioning requirement for housing loans with teaser interest rates was increased to 2.0 per cent in December 2010. It remained at two per cent till
one year after reset of interest rate to higher rate and thereafter it was 0.4 per cent. For other housing loans, the provisioning remained at 0.4 per cent.
@: As per the DBOD Circular No.DBOD.BP.BC.No. 104 dated June 21, 2013, a new subsector called 'Commercial Real Estate-Residential Housing (CRE-RH)'
has been carved out of CRE and this segment attracts a lower risk weight of 75 per cent and lower standard asset provisioning of 0.75 per cent. |
Appendix Table V.4: Capital Control Measures Taken to Address Exchange Market Volatility |
Item |
August 1995 to March 1996 (Mexican Crisis) |
August 1997 - August 1998 (East Asian Crisis) |
High Capital flow during 2003-04 to 2007-08 |
Global Crisis: 2008-09 |
Since May 2013 |
FCNR (B) & NRE |
Foreign currency deposits like FCNR(B) and NR(NR) RD were exempted from CRR requirements.
Increase in interest rates on NRE deposits. |
Removal of incremental CRR of 10 per cent on NRERA and NR(NR) deposits. |
Reduction in interest rate ceiling on FCNR(B) and NR(E)RA deposits. |
Increase in interest
rate ceiling on
FRNR (B) and NRE
deposits. |
Separate concessional swap
window to attract FCNR(B)
dollar funds.
Exemption from maintenance of CRR and SLR on incremental FCNR (B) deposits as also NRE
deposits with reference to base
date of July 26, 2013, and having
maturity of three years and above.
Deregulation of interest rate on
NRE deposits.
Increase in interest rate ceiling
by 100 bps to LIBOR/ SWAP plus 400 bps on FCNR(B) deposits of maturity 3 to 5 years. |
ECB and
trade credit |
Relaxation in the
ECB norms. |
|
Increasing the
existing limit for
prepayment of
external
commercial
borrowings (ECBs)
without the RBI’s approval from US$ 400 million to US$ 500 million, subject to compliance with the minimum average maturity
period. |
Relaxation in ECB
policy in terms of
upward revision in
all-in-cost ceiling,
eligible borrowers
and end use.
CB allowed for repayment of outstanding rupee loan towards capital expenditure, under approval route.
Introduction of
Foreign Currency
Exchangeable
bonds.
All-in-cost ceiling
for trade credits
with maturity up
to one year and
between one and
three years has
been revised to
350 bps above
6-month LIBOR. |
Expansion of eligible end use of
ECB to include import of
services, technical know-how
and payment of license fees as
part of import of capital goods,
subject to certain conditions.
Availment of ECB for working capital for civil aviation sector.
Extension of scheme for Buyback / Prepayment of FCCBs under the approval route, up to December 31,2013.
Availment of ECB for financing
3G spectrum outstanding rupee
loan.
Availament of ECB by NBFCAsses
Finance companies.
ECB raised under the approval
route from foreign equity
holder company with minimum
average maturity of seven years
allowed to use for general
corporate purposes, subject to
the certain conditions. |
FII |
|
|
Ban on use of
Promissory Notes. |
Lock-in period of
long term
infrastructure
bonds for FIIs was
reduced to one
year.
Ceiling for FIIs
investment in
G-sec and
corporate bonds
raised by US$ 5
billion each to US$
20 billion and US$
45 billion
respectively. |
Enhance the limit for foreign
investment in Government
dated securities by US$ 5 billion
to US$ 30 billion. Enhanced
limit is available only for long
term investors registered with
SEBI (Sovereign Wealth Funds
(SWFs), Multilateral Agencies,
Pension/ Insurance/
Endowment Funds, Foreign
Central Banks). |
Others |
|
Floating of
Resurgent India
Bonds. |
Ban on use of
offshore derivative
products.
Ban on overseas
individual to
participate in
Indian stock
market. |
Rupee Dollar Swap
Facility.
To convert 10 per
cent of the
balances in the
EEFC accounts.
Qualified Foreign
Investors (QFIs)
allowed to invest
in mutual funds.
Broadening of
investor base for
G-sec to include
Sovereign Wealth
Funds, insurance
funds and pension
funds.
Increased in
overseas borrowing
limits for banks
from 25 per cent to
50 per cent of
Tier-I capital or
US$ 10 million,
whichever is
higher. |
Increase in overseas borrowing
limits for banks from 50 per
cent to 100 per cent of Tier-I
capital.
Increase in overseas borrowing
limits for banks from 50 per
cent to 100 per cent of Tier-I
capital or US$ 10 million,
whichever is higher. |
Outflows |
|
|
Limit on outward
FDI increased
gradually to 400 percent of the their net
worth under the
automatic route.
Gradual increase in
limit of outward
portfolio
investments by
listed companies
to 50 per cent of
the net worth and
dispensing with
the requirement of
10 per cent
reciprocal share
holding in the
listed Indian
companies by
overseas
companies.
Enhancement in
limit on overseas
investment by
mutual funds
registered with the
SEBI to US$ 7
billion.
Enhancement of
limit on overseas
investment under
the Liberalised
Remittance
Scheme (LRS) for
resident
individuals.
Interest payment
of EEFC accounts
to the extent of
outstanding
balances of US$ 1
million per
exporters
(temporary
measure, valid up
to Oct 31, 2018.
Facility closed on
Nov 1, 2018. |
|
Reduction in the limit of
outward FDI from 400 per cent
to 100 per cent of net worth of
Indian company, under
Automatic Route.
Reduction in limit of
US$ 200,000 per financial year
to US$ 75,000 per financial year
under Liberalized Remittance
Schemes. |
|
|