In line with the projection made in the Annual Policy statement, inflation remained high in Q1
of 2011-12. The revision in fuel prices effected in June 2011 was factored in the projected
inflation path which reduces, but does not fully eliminate the suppressed inflation risks. Softening
of global commodity prices may provide some respite in the short-run. The favourable impact
of a near normal monsoon on food inflation, however, could be offset by hike in minimum
support prices. Non-food manufactured products inflation remains significantly higher than the
long-term average of about 4 per cent, and reflects the persistence of pricing power. Apart from
supply-side factors, demand pressures need to soften further for containing inflation. Price pressures
are expected to persist through Q2 as well and then moderate in the later part of 2011-12.
Near-term upside risks to inflation
remain significant
VI.1 Inflationary pressures persisted during
Q1 of 2011-12 (9.4 per cent y-o-y, provisional
in June 2011), reflecting transmission of global
commodity prices to domestic inflation as well
as increase in manufactured product prices on
account of sustained input cost pressures.
Producers were able to considerably pass on
high costs amidst strong consumption demand.
Global commodity prices exhibited some
moderation in the recent period. However, as
administered fuel prices were not raised earlier
when global prices had risen sharply, a
revision of fuel prices became inevitable
and was effected on June 25, 2011. Even
after this revision the pass-through is incomplete
and remains a source of upside risk during
the year.
VI.2 For many other commodities passthrough
remains incomplete, limiting the
possibility of domestic prices falling in tandem
with softening global prices. On the other hand,
should global commodity prices start firming
up again there will be further pressure on
domestic prices. In any case, sticky
administered prices pose a fiscal risk as they
entail larger subsidies. They are also a source
of inflation in the medium-to-long run as they
dampen supply response by keeping interest rates high and resulting in a drag on
investment. There are other sources of likely
price pressures during the course of the year.
Utility prices, especially electricity, may need
to be revised up to cover costs. Domestic
fertiliser prices still remain disconnected with
higher prices of imported fertilisers and
fertiliser inputs. Large discrete changes in
administered prices also affect inflation
expectations.
VI.3 Primary food articles inflation
moderated to 9.1 per cent in Q1 of 2011-12 from
over 20 per cent level seen in Q1 of 2010-11,
largely reflecting base effect as index levels
continued to increase reflecting the structural
character of inflation especially in protein rich
items. Latest data available from NSSO
quinquennial consumer expenditure survey
(2009-10) suggests that there has been a secular
shift in dietary pattern towards protein rich food
items, both in rural and urban areas. Price
pressures in these items could continue in the
absence of supply response, as was seen in
recent years (Chart VI.1). Renewed pressures
may also come from revision in Minimum
Support Prices (MSP). Non-food manufactured
products inflation persisted at very high levels
compared to its historical average and may
persist as cost pressures and pricing power
remain significant.
Administered price revisions and increase
in freely priced fuel products keep fuel
inflation high
VI.4 The suppressed inflation concern,
expressed in this Report in the preceding quarter
came to roost, but this price adjustment is a
significant step forward in strengthening the
macroeconomic position of the Indian economy.
Pass-through of international crude prices to
domestic inflation has been significant in the
recent period with most of the items under the
freely priced category registering increases
(Chart VI.2). International crude oil prices,
though registered some decline in recent
months, remain elevated as compared to the
previous year.
VI.5 As domestic administered prices of fuel
products were kept unchanged for one year, this had led to substantial increase in the magnitude
of under recoveries leading to corresponding
large increase in fiscal burden. On June 25, 2011
the Government decided to increase the price
of diesel by `3 per litre, PDS kerosene by `2
per litre and of domestic LPG by `50 per
cylinder and reduce the excise as well as custom
duties to partly address the issue of under
recoveries. The direct impact of this increase
on WPI inflation was 0.7 percentage points.
Given that monthly WPI is an average of weeks,
the full impact of this increase would be seen
in the WPI for the month July 2011, as the price
revision was effected in the last week of June
2011.
Inflation still driven by both cost-push and
demand-side pressures
VI.6 The generalisation of inflation with
significant cost-push and demand side factors
driving price changes in non-food manufacturing
commodities has extended into Q1 of 2011-12.
The wholesale price index (WPI) has continued
its uptrend during 2011-12 so far even though
year-on-year WPI inflation declined marginally
in April 2011, owing to the high base. Inflation
edged up in May and June 2011 reflecting
continued price pressures. This was
corroborated by the month over month
seasonally adjusted changes which remained
significantly positive during the recent period
(Chart VI.3). The m-o-m rate of change in WPI suggests that the build-up of price pressures has
varied significantly over months, but remained
positive in almost every successive month.
 |
VI.7 Importantly, the underlying drivers of
increase in WPI changed considerably over
three phases since March 2010. Price rise since December 2010 reflects generalisation of the
inflationary pressures as also the dominant
contribution from non-food manufactured
products inflation (Chart VI.4). The food group
had the highest contribution to the increase in
WPI during the first phase (between April and July 2010). Primary non-food articles,
particularly fibres like raw cotton, raw jute and
raw silk had the dominant contribution in the
second phase (between August and November
2010). It may also be noted that, the
contribution of food group to overall increase
in WPI has declined over successive phases.
Non-food manufactured products inflation
key to inflation concern
VI.8 The significant pick-up in non-food
manufactured products inflation since
December 2010 has been largely driven by passthrough
of input cost pressures to output prices.
Without the presence of demand pressures, the
generalisation process would not have sustained
over successive months. High month-overmonth
seasonally adjusted inflation indicates
that the price pressures have been almost
continuous (Chart VI.5).
VI.9 Textiles, chemicals and metals continue
to contribute to most of the increase in
manufactured non-food products (Chart VI.6).
Input cost pressures have been significant for
these products. Any moderation in
manufactured non-food products inflation
therefore would require both easing of pressures
from input cost side as well as demand.
Electricity price inflation remains moderate but
given the increases in coal and mineral oils
prices, electricity prices are likely to rise in the
near-term.
Inflation surprise in advanced countries
changes global inflation dynamics
VI.10 Inflation emerged as a key policy
concern in the global economy in recent months
as increase in commodity prices spilled over to
headline inflation. The World Economic
Outlook Update (June 2011) of the IMF revised
upwards the projection of inflation for 2011 for
advanced economies to 2.6 per cent (from 2.2
per cent earlier projected in April 2011) while
for emerging economies it was kept unchanged
(6.9 per cent). Though core inflation in
advanced economies remains subdued
indicating absence of significant pressures from
domestic demand, headline inflation has
exceeded the target level for most inflation
targeting economies. The divergence in inflation
between advanced and emerging economies is
both on account of higher share of food and fuel
in total consumption basket as well as buoyant
demand due to faster recovery in EMEs. The
increase in unit labour costs in EMEs is being
seen as a risk to global price stability because
of the growing internationalisation of supply
chains.
VI.11 Subdued core inflation provided the
space to most advanced economies to continue
with accommodative monetary policy. The BIS,
in its annual report 2010-11, however, cautions
that the degree of global economic slack may
be much less than what is generally believed
and hence, inflationary pressures could stem from global recovery running into capacity
constraints. Accommodative monetary policy
conditions also entail the risk of adding to
commodity price pressures. Most central banks
of advanced economies continue to pursue
policy rates at near zero/very low levels, while
emerging economies have gradually tightened
monetary policy to contain inflation pressures
(Table VI.1).
Commodity prices ease with global growth
weakening, unclear if this is transitory
VI.12 Global commodity prices have
exhibited some decline in the Q1 of 2011-12,
largely driven by improved supply prospects
as well as some unwinding of investment
positions in commodity futures market by
financial investors. Crude oil prices moderated
on the back of 28 International Energy Agency
(IEA) member countries agreeing to release 60 million barrels of oil in July 2011 (Chart
VI.7). Food prices have also moderated
somewhat as supply response to high prices
are expected to be good along with removal of
trade restrictions by a number of countries.
However, the prices continue to rule at
significantly high levels.
VI.13 Declining stocks in many key
commodities also indicate that the price decline
seen recently may not sustain for a prolonged
period of time. The FAO-OECD Agricultural
outlook for 2011-20 indicates that short-term
supply response may temporarily ease price
pressures but food prices “... on an average are
projected to remain on a higher plateau
compared to the previous decade in both
nominal and real terms.” Rising income,
diversification of dietary pattern to more
protein-rich items as well as attraction of bio- fuel as an alternative source of energy could
contribute to market tightness.
Table VI.1: Global Inflation Indicators |
(Per cent) |
Country/ Region |
Key Policy Rate |
Policy Rate
(as on July 22, 2011) |
Changes in Policy Rates (basis points) |
CPI Inflation
(y-o-y) |
Sep, 15. 08 to Aug. 23, 09 |
Since Aug. 23, 09 |
June- 10 |
June- 11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Developed Economies |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
Cash Rate |
4.75 (Nov. 3, 2010) |
(-) 400 |
175 |
2.9 ^ |
3.3 ^ |
Canada |
Overnight Rate |
1.00 (Sep. 8, 2010) |
(-) 275 |
75 |
1.0 |
3.1 |
Euro area |
Interest Rate on Main Refinancing Operations |
1.50 (Jul. 13, 2011) |
(-) 325 |
50 |
1.5 |
2.7 |
Japan |
Uncollateralised Overnight Call Rate# |
0.0 to 0.10 (Oct. 5, 2010) |
(-) 40 |
(-) 10 |
-0.7* |
0.3* |
UK |
Official Bank Rate |
0.50 (Mar. 5,2009) |
(-) 450 |
0 |
3.2 |
4.2 |
US |
Federal Funds Rate# |
0.0 to 0.25 (Dec.16,2008) |
(-) 200 |
0 |
1.1 |
3.6 |
Developing Economies |
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
Selic Rate |
12.50 (Jul. 21, 2011) |
(-) 500 |
375 |
4.8 |
6.7 |
India |
Repo Rate |
7.50 (Jun.16, 2011) |
(-) 425 |
275 |
13.9* |
8.7* |
|
|
|
(-400) |
(100) |
|
|
China |
Benchmark 1-year Deposit Rate |
3.50 (Jul. 7, 2011) |
(-) 214 |
125 |
2.9 |
6.4 |
|
Benchmark 1-year Lending Rate |
6.56 (Jul. 7, 2011) |
(-) 241 |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
(-200) |
(600) |
|
|
Indonesia |
BI Rate |
6.75 (Feb. 4, 2011) |
(-) 275 |
25 |
5.0 |
5.5 |
Israel |
Key Rate |
3.25 (Jun. 1, 2011) |
(-) 375 |
275 |
2.4 |
4.2 |
Korea |
Base Rate |
3.25 (Jun. 10, 2011) |
(-) 325 |
125 |
2.6 |
4.4 |
Philippines |
Reverse Repo Rate |
4.50 (May. 5, 2011) |
(-) 200 |
50 |
3.6 |
5.2 |
|
Repo Rate |
6.50 (May. 5, 2011) |
(-) 200 |
50 |
|
|
Russia |
Refinancing Rate |
8.25 (May. 3, 2011) |
(-) 25 |
(-) 250 |
5.8* |
9.6* |
South Africa |
Repo Rate |
5.50 (Nov. 19, 2010) |
(-) 500 |
(-) 150 |
4.2 |
5.0 |
Thailand |
1-day Repurchase Rate |
3.25 (Jul. 13, 2011) |
(-) 250 |
200 |
3.3 |
4.1 |
^ : Q4 of 2010-11. # : Change is worked out from the minimum point of target range. *: May.
Note: 1. For India, data on inflation pertain to CPI for Industrial Workers.
2. Figures in parentheses in column (3) indicate the effective dates when the policy rates were last revised.
3. Figures in parentheses in column (4 & 5) indicate the variation in the cash reserve ratio during the period.
Source: Websites of respective central banks/statistical agencies. |
 |
Food inflation declines significantly, but
seasonal and structural factors still
important
VI.14 Primary food articles inflation declined
significantly over past few months, barring
December 2010-January 2011 when the trend
reversed temporarily (Chart VI.8). The decline,
however, has not been significant enough to ease
the concern on food inflation. Moreover, it largely
reflects the base effect, since food price levels
continue to be high (Chart VI.9). Moreover
manufactured food products inflation, which
declined sharply during 2010-11 has reversed
course in recent months. This is mainly led by
increase in prices of edible oils, milk products
and tea & coffee indicating that the past increases in primary food prices are getting reflected in
manufactured food price increases, with a lag.
Near normal monsoon may not ease
pressure on food inflation.
VI.15 A near normal monsoon is generally
expected to have a softening impact on prices
of food articles, but some risks to food inflation
have emerged. The recent increases in Minimum
Support Prices (MSPs) for key agricultural
commodities, though it aims at protecting
producers from price risk, could in turn have
some inflationary impact. It has been observed
that the trend in prices of food articles more or
less follows the increase in MSPs, with
MSPs providing the floor to market prices
(Chart VI.10).
VI.16 Since a cost-plus pricing approach
underpins revisions in MSPs, trends in input
costs and rural wages provide lead information
about expected path of food inflation. Increases
in wages in rural areas could also put pressure
on food prices both from demand and supply
side. While increase in wages push up cost of
production for agriculture, higher wage income
is expected to provide purchasing power which
could translate to higher demand, thereby
pushing up prices. It has been observed that
during 2010-11 the increase in wages for rural
unskilled labourers have been on an average
much higher than the increase in prices (state
wise CPI- Rural Labourers inflation) indicating possibility of further pressure on prices going
forward from higher wages (Chart VI.11).
 |
VI.17 During Q1 of 2011-12, prices of nonfood
primary articles showed moderation as raw
cotton prices declined significantly both on
account of favourable production and decline
in international prices. A major contributor to
manufactured non-food products inflation in
recent months has been textiles, tracking past
increase in raw cotton and fibres prices. The
recent trend of declining cotton prices, however,
could lead to moderation in inflation for textiles
too. Among the minerals group, the crude
petroleum index was revised upwards
significantly by 34.4 per cent effective second
week of April 2011, reflecting lagged reporting
of past increases in prices of domestic crude
oil. This alone raised WPI inflation by about
0.4 percentage points.
CPI and WPI inflation converge with
generalisation of price pressures
VI.18 Various measures of CPI inflation
remained in the range of 8.7-9.3 per cent in May/
June 2011. The convergence of various
measures of CPI inflation with WPI inflation
reflect moderation of food prices and increase
in non-food manufactured products inflation
(Chart VI.12).
VI.19 The new CPI introduced for urban and
rural areas along with a composite All-India
CPI suggest continued price pressures with the latest reading of 108.8 (provisional) for June
2011 (base: 2010=100). This new Consumer
Price Index for ‘rural’, ‘urban’ and ‘combined’
introduced since January 2011 is a major
initiative to improve price statistics. The
introduction of new CPIs provides a
nationwide price index which is more
comprehensive in coverage across regions as
well as commodity groups. A comparison of
the new CPI series against the existing series
suggests that while the weight of food group
has declined significantly for both rural and
urban groups, the miscellaneous group, largely
services, has increased in share. As year-onyear
inflation data based on the new CPI
become available from January 2012, it will
be closer to the measure of inflation that is
being commonly used in other countries for
the conduct of monetary policy. However, long
time series data, especially for the back period
would not be available for these new indices,
which limits the suitability of the data for
policy analysis in the near-term.
Inflation may moderate gradually due to
structural constraints
VI.20 Responding to persistent high inflation
and increasing generalisation of price pressures,
the Reserve Bank has significantly raised its
emphasis on containing inflation. The impact
of the anti-inflationary measures through
expected moderation in demand, however, faces
resistance from commodity price and wage inflation, which constantly add to price
pressures. The softening of global commodity
prices could be temporary. If the
accommodative monetary policy stance of
advanced economies continues, commodity
price pressures are likely to resurface. Recent
trends in minimum support prices and rural wages suggest that given their conditioning
influence on food inflation, a near normal
monsoon may not ease food inflation
significantly.
 |
VI.21 With overshooting of the fiscal deficit
target a possibility, its expansionary impact on
demand could partly offset the moderation in demand resulting from anti inflationary
monetary actions and weaken monetary policy
effectiveness. High inflation over several
months has not led to price induced supply
response in many critical commodities; in turn input cost pressures have spilled over to output
prices. These trends necessitate structural
reforms to enhance supply response while antiinflationary
bias of monetary policy anchors
inflation expectations.
|