Inflation has persisted at levels beyond Reserve Bank’s comfort level which is inimical to growth.
Inertial dynamics in wage and food prices have exacerbated the inflationary pressures. Inflation
risks have stayed and high inflation is likely to persist during Q2 of 2011-12, though moderation
in inflation is expected in the later part of the year. On the other hand, growth has showed signs
of some moderation. Risk factors have emerged that could adversely impact aggregate demand.
The business expectation surveys of various agencies, as well as the Reserve Bank’s Industrial
Outlook Survey suggest moderation due to higher input costs and rising interest rates.
Professional forecasters’ survey also supports the possibility of marginal moderation in economic
activity. While monetary policy has been considerably tightened, the policy exigency at this
juncture warrants continuation of anti-inflationary stance to tame inflation and anchor
inflationary expectations.
Inflation risks stay, while growth showed
signs of moderation.
VII.1 In its Policy Statement of May 3, 2011,
the Reserve Bank stated that inflation would
stay at elevated level during the first half of
2011-12 before declining in the second half.
Trends during Q1 of 2011-12 suggest that
inflation trends have conformed with that
assessment. Not only has the headline inflation
stayed at around 9 per cent, non-food
manufacturing inflation remains significantly
high at above 7 per cent. On a sequential basis,
the pace of price rise in this segment has stayed
high since December 2010 on back of cost-push
and demand-side factors. If the monsoon turns
sub-normal, upside risks to the projected
moderation in inflation during the second half
would go up.
VII.2 On the other hand, there are signs of
growth moderation during Q1 of 2011-12. On
current reckoning, growth is likely to stay
around trend during 2011-12 in line with the
policy projection made in May. However,
downside risks have increased. Challenges from
the policy perspective have become even more
stringent with increased risks to growth though
inflation is likely to remain high in near term.
The downside risks to growth emerge from
uncertainties relating to South-West monsoon,
likely moderation in private consumption and investment demand, high input costs, escalating
cost of capital and uncertain global outlook
which may impact the external demand and
capital flows adversely. The overall assessment
however suggests that agricultural growth may
turn out to be lower on account of high growth
last year.
VII.3 Notwithstanding the slowdown in
growth, with high inflation, there are risks to
growth sustainability that cannot be overlooked
by monetary policy. It requires continued antiinflationary
bias with a close watch and nimblefooted
calibration to new information. It is
important to complete monetary transmission
while it is also necessary that any possible
turning points in cyclical conditions are not
missed. There are upside risks to inflation from
still incomplete pass-through of global
commodity prices, downward stickiness of food
prices, recent revisions in minimum support
prices and evidence of wage price spiral.
The inflation has proved to be stubborn so far
and in view of the above factors may not subside
in the second quarter of 2011-12. The challenge
at this juncture is to contain inflationary
pressures, while factoring in the lags in
transmission of the monetary policy action.
The task of monetary policy is made complex
as these lags are often long and variable in
length.
Table VII.1: Business Expectations Surveys |
Period Index |
NCAER-Business Confidence Index Apr. 2011 |
FICCI Overall Business Confidence Index Q3:2010-11 |
Dun & Bradstreet Business Optimism Index Q3: 2011 |
CII Business Confidence Index Apr.-Jun. 2011-12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Current level of the Index |
145.2 |
63.8 |
143.6 |
62.5 |
Index as per previous survey |
145.3 |
76.2 |
183.3 |
66.7 |
Index levels one year back |
155.9 |
70.0 |
150.0 |
67.6 |
% change (q-o-q) sequential |
-0.1 |
-16.3 |
-21.7 |
-6.3 |
% change (y-o-y) |
-6.9 |
-8.9 |
-4.2 |
-7.5* |
*: Percentage change over April-September 2010-11 survey. |
Business expectations surveys indicate
moderation
VII.4 Various business expectations surveys
show moderation over the previous quarter and
year, indicating a slowdown in overall economic
activity. Persistent inflation appears to be the
most important factor affecting the business
expectations. Global uncertainty, higher input
costs, higher interest rates and expectation of
lower demand for finished goods are some of
the other factors affecting the business
sentiments of the Indian companies (Table VII.1).
VII.5 The seasonally adjusted HSBC Markit
Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index
(PMI) declined to its nine month low in June
2011, though it remained in expansionary mode.
Sequential growth in output and new orders
decelerated further. Rising input costs and
borrowing costs have put further pressure on
growth momentum. Seasonally adjusted PMI
for services sector in June also remained in
expansionary mode. It was marginally above
May, though lower than that during January-
April 2011.
Survey suggests Industrial Outlook has
weakened
VII.6 The 54th round of the Industrial Outlook
Survey of the Reserve Bank conducted during
April-June 2011, based on a sample of 1,504
companies, showed moderation for the
assessment quarter (April-June 2011) as well
as for the expectation quarter (July-September
2011), but still remained in growth terrain (i.e.
above 100, which is the mark that separates
contraction from expansion) (Chart VII.1).
The survey shows that the Indian manufacturing
sector has moderated its view about demand
conditions as net responses on production, order
books, capacity utilisation, exports and imports
showed lower optimism for the assessment
quarter. In the expectation quarter however,
slight improvement was visible.
VII.7 While outlook on availability of finance
was less optimistic, the respondents expected
cost of finance to rise further. A majority of
respondents anticipated raw material costs to
go up, which may affect profit margin adversely (Table VII.2). Overall, lower business optimism
is seen in cement, textiles, basic metals,
electrical machinery, transport equipment and
fertiliser industry.
 |
Table VII.2: Reserve Bank’s Industrial Outlook Survey |
Parameter |
Optimistic Response |
Net Response |
October-December |
January-March |
April-June |
July-September |
2010 |
2011 |
2011 |
2011 |
E |
A |
E |
A |
E |
A |
E |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
1. |
Overall Business Situation |
Better |
47.5 |
45.9 |
50.1 |
38.6 |
41.4 |
32.6 |
39.8 |
2. |
Overall Financial Situation |
Better |
39.6 |
37.1 |
41.1 |
27.1 |
33.4 |
24.1 |
30.6 |
3. |
Availability of Finance |
Improve |
31.3 |
30.3 |
32.3 |
23.8 |
27.3 |
21.5 |
24.2 |
4. |
Cost of External Finance |
Decrease |
-28.3 |
-33.9 |
-31.3 |
-42.5 |
-35.0 |
-49.0 |
-39.7 |
5. |
Production |
Increase |
49.1 |
43.9 |
48.6 |
41.4 |
40.0 |
32.1 |
40.6 |
6. |
Order Books |
Increase |
44.8 |
37.9 |
44.0 |
34.7 |
38.4 |
28.1 |
35.9 |
7. |
Level of Capacity Utilisation |
Above Normal |
7.2 |
5.6 |
9.5 |
4.9 |
4.4 |
17.2 |
25.0 |
8. |
Cost of Raw Material |
|
-49.3 |
63.9 |
-53.6 |
-71.9 |
-57.0 |
-65.5 |
-51.7 |
9. |
Employment in the Company |
Increase |
21.0 |
19.4 |
20.6 |
18.7 |
17.4 |
18.2 |
19.4 |
10. |
Exports |
Increase |
26.1 |
23.1 |
26.3 |
18.9 |
24.0 |
18.2 |
25.8 |
11. |
Imports |
Increase |
22.2 |
20.9 |
21.3 |
19.9 |
18.9 |
17.6 |
19.0 |
12. |
Selling Price |
Increase |
17.0 |
20.2 |
18.6 |
26.5 |
23.7 |
21.5 |
18.3 |
13. |
Profit Margin |
Increase |
9.2 |
-0.4 |
8.3 |
-4.3 |
3.8 |
-9.9 |
2.5 |
Note: 1. 'Net response' is measured as the percentage share differential between the companies reporting 'optimistic' (positive) and 'pessimistic'
(negative) responses; responses indicating status quo (no change) are not reckoned. Higher 'net response' indicates higher level of
confidence and vice versa.
2. E: Expectations and A: Assessment. |
No significant downward revision in
growth forecasts by other agencies
VII.8 Various international as well as domestic
agencies have maintained their earlier forecasts,
while OECD has revised it upwards. Only
World Bank has revised the outlook downwards
from the high of 9.0 per cent to 8.2 per cent,
which in any case is in line with other forecasts
(Table VII.3).
Survey of Professional Forecasters
suggests moderation in activity1
VII.9 The results of the sixteenth round of
‘Survey of Professional Forecasters’ conducted by the Reserve Bank in June 2011 shows a
downward revision in growth rate for 2011-12
as compared to the previous survey (Table
VII.4). While the growth forecast for the
agriculture sector was revised upwards, the
forecast of industrial growth rate and services
sector was revised downwards. Annual average
WPI inflation forecast for the year 2011-12 was
also revised upwards.
The troika that may alter baseline growth
and inflation projections
VII.10 It is clear that there has been no
significant alteration to the growth and inflation
projections or the growth-inflation dynamics
that were discussed in the ‘Macroeconomic and
Monetary Developments’ released a quarter ago.
However, at the margin, downside risks to growth may have increased, while inflation
stickiness is more evident.
Table VII.3: Agencies’ Projections for 2011-12 |
Agency |
Latest Projection |
Earlier Projection |
Real GDP Growth
(Per cent) |
Month |
Real GDP Growth
(Per cent) |
Month |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Economic Advisory Council to the PM |
9.0 (+/-0.25) |
Feb-11 |
- |
- |
Finance Ministry |
9.0 (+/-0.25) |
Feb-11 |
- |
- |
IMF# |
8.0 |
Jun-11 |
8.0 |
Apr-11 |
OECD |
8.5 |
May-11 |
8.2 |
Nov-10 |
World Bank |
8.2 |
Jun-11 |
9.0 |
Feb-11 |
ADB |
8.2 |
Apr-11 |
- |
- |
NCAER |
8.5 |
Apr-11 |
- |
- |
#: IMFs’ forecast for growth is 8.2 per cent at market prices. |
Table VII.4: Median Forecasts of Select Macroeconomic Indicators by Professional
Forecasters 2011-12 and 2012-13 |
|
Actual 2010-11 |
Annual Forecasts |
Quarterly Forecast |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
E |
L |
E |
L |
E |
L |
E |
L |
E |
L |
E |
L |
E |
L |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
1. Real GDP growth rate at factor cost (in per cent) |
8.5# |
8.2 |
7.9 |
- |
8.3 |
8.3 |
7.7 |
8.1 |
7.7 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
8.5 |
8.2 |
- |
8.1 |
a. Agriculture & Allied Activities |
6.6# |
3.1 |
3.5 |
- |
3.6 |
3.8 |
4.8 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
2.2 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
- |
3.8 |
b. Industry |
7.8# |
8.2 |
7.4 |
- |
8.1 |
7.0 |
6.2 |
8.0 |
7.2 |
8.7 |
8.1 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
- |
8.0 |
c. Services |
9.2# |
9.6 |
9.0 |
- |
9.4 |
9.8 |
8.7 |
9.3 |
9.0 |
9.5 |
9.8 |
9.7 |
9.6 |
- |
9.4 |
2. Gross Domestic Saving (per cent of GDP at current market price) |
- |
35.3 |
34.2 |
- |
35.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3. Gross Domestic Capital Formation (per cent of GDP at current market price) |
- |
37.5 |
35.5 |
- |
36.4 |
36.5 |
34.0 |
37.3 |
35.0 |
37.8 |
35.0 |
38.5 |
36.0 |
- |
37.0 |
4. Average WPI-Inflation |
9.6 |
7.5 |
8.6 |
- |
6.5 |
8.2 |
9.4& |
7.8 |
10.0 |
7.5 |
8.8 |
6.7 |
6.9 |
- |
6.8 |
5. Exchange Rate (INR/1USD end period) |
44.65 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
- |
43.5 |
44.5 |
44.7& |
44.7 |
44.8 |
44.5 |
44.6 |
44.5 |
44.5 |
- |
44.0 |
6. T-Bill 91 days Yield (per cent-end period) |
7.31 |
7.5 |
8.0 |
- |
7.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7. 10-year Govt. Securities Yield (per cent-end period) |
8.02 |
8.0 |
8.3 |
- |
8.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8. Export (growth rate in per cent)! |
37.4 |
17.2 |
20.5 |
- |
20.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9. Import (growth rate in per cent)! |
21.6 |
20.0 |
23.0 |
- |
19.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10. Trade Balance (US$ billion) |
-104.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-36.0 |
-35.5 |
-39.1 |
-39.4 |
-38.5 |
-34.3 |
-39.8 |
-35.0 |
- |
-40.0 |
E: Previous Round Projection. L: Latest Round Projection. #: Revised Estimate. P: Provisional
- : Not Available. &: Actual !: US$ on BoP basis.
Note: The latest round refers to sixteenth round for the quarter ended June 2011, while previous round refers to fifteenth round for
the quarter ended March 2011.
Source: Survey of Professional Forecasters, First Quarter 2011-12. |
VII.11 The three important factors that could
significantly alter the baseline path of growth
and inflation are: (1) significant departure of
monsoon from ‘normal’, (2) a collapse or rebuild
of global commodity price bubble, and
(3) Euro zone debt crisis assuming a full-blown
proportion. Growth could slowdown and
inflation pick up further if kharif crop is
affected or global commodity prices surge
again. Alternatively, normal monsoon or
further softening of global commodity prices
could be growth positive and bring about a
faster fall in inflation. A full-scale Euro zone
crisis could result in domestic inflation falling
quickly, through a fall in external demand and
international commodity prices. It could,
however, also impact growth adversely
through trade and capital flow channels. So
how growth-inflation dynamics may play is a complex process, but clearly persistent high
inflation remains a risk to growth
sustainability. The risk of inflation persistence
are also exacerbated by structural drivers of
food inflation.
VII.12 The data from new IIP base has
reconfirmed the Reserve Bank’s view that there
was no significant moderation in industrial
production in H2 of 2010-11 and the
deceleration in fourth quarter was exacerbated
by a few volatile components. Similarly,
the deceleration in industrial growth in
April-May 2011 partly reflects subdued growth
in some core industries along with base effect.
Going forward, there is a possibility of some
softening of industrial activity due to high input
cost pressures and escalating cost of capital. In
contrast to the likely subdued trend in
agriculture and industrial sector, the services
sector may continue to show a buoyant trend,
which may support the growth process.
VII.13 On the expenditure side, the domestic
demand conditions continue to receive support
from strong growth in private demand so far.
Even though exports are growing at a faster pace
than imports, going forward, the outlook for
exports remains uncertain given the subdued
growth and employment trends in Euro zone
countries and the US. On domestic front, the
recent initiatives by the Central and State
governments for fiscal consolidation has
resulted in slowdown in government
consumption expenditure. Though this growth
driver, on expenditure side, has slowed down,
the trend may not continue in 2011-12 unless
more radical measures are implemented to
contain subsidies expenditure so that private
investment demand is not crowded out amidst
monetary tightening.
VII.14 Corporate sales growth has remained
robust indicating continuation of strong demand
conditions so far. The profit margins have
however, come under stress following higher
input and interest costs. Going forward, some
moderation in investment and consumption
demand is likely, as high inflation may erode
purchasing power. The anti-inflationary
monetary policy stance is also likely to soften
the demand. There is also a need for credit
growth to decelerate further.
Breaking inertial dynamics of wage and
food price rise important for arresting
inflation
VII.15 The latest employment survey result of
the NSSO indicates that the real wages of the
casual labourers have been rising in recent
years. This implies that on an average, the
purchasing power of the poor may not have been
dented by inflation. The Government's schemes
such as MGNREGA to promote inclusive
growth seem to have had a positive welfare
impact. However, the faster increase in wages
vis-à-vis inflation poses the risk of wage-price
spiral, particularly for food inflation, as the
revision in MSPs take into account wage cost
escalation. Increase in demand for food as a result of higher wages, in the absence of
adequate supply response, leads to higher food
prices. Rise in wages in response to inflation
could also become faster both on account of
MGNREGA wages being indexed to inflation
and increase in wage bargaining capacity in the
casual labour market. This wage-price inertial
movement could add to the structural pressure
on food inflation.
VII.16 Evidence also suggests that resultant
primary food inflation eventually gets reflected
in manufactured food inflation. This, coupled
with indications of downward stickiness of food
prices, especially in the case of protein-rich
items, gets translated into higher inflation. The
capacity utilisation levels are also high which
may put further pressure on manufacturing
products inflation. Taking into account all
these factors, it is important to break the
inertial dynamics to contain the inflationary
pressures.
Unfinished task of taming inflation
warrants continuation of anti-inflationary
monetary stance
VII.17 The emerging growth risks are likely
to be factored in the policy reaction. However,
inflation has stayed high for a year and a half
now, averaging 9.5 per cent in this period.
Amidst a wage-price spiral and continued costpush
and demand side pressures on domestic
prices, monetary policy confronts two key
questions. First, will the recent signs of
weakening activity persist and restrain wage
price and demand side pressures on
manufacturing inflation? Second, are there
other factors that might put further pressure
on prices and wages and keep inflation high,
thus feeding further on inflation expectations?
A judgement on the answers to these questions
will influence the calibration of the monetary
policy stance. Monetary policy will have to
preserve the broad thrust on tight monetary
stance till there is credible evidence of inflation
trending close to a level within the Reserve
Bank’s comfort zone.
1Introduced by the Reserve Bank from the quarter ended September 2007. The forecasts reflect the views of external professional forecasters
and not of the Reserve Bank. |