Despite a surge in exports and higher net invisibles receipts, the current account deficit (CAD)
increased during Q1 of 2011-12 reflecting strong import growth on account of higher oil prices
and sharp increase in imports of gold & silver, machinery and electronics. The composition of
capital inflows shifted with a sharp fall in FII inflows and rise in FDI. The uncertainties associated
with the sovereign debt problem in the euro area and the slowdown in the US could pose
challenges for India’s external sector. The external sector outlook, though stable in the baseline
scenario, will require close monitoring with a greater emphasis on encouraging FDI inflows.
Widening CAD poses risks amidst
uncertain global conditions
III.1 Although merchandise export growth
outpaced import growth, CAD surged during
Q1 of 2011-12 in absolute terms, reflecting
sharp increase in imports of oil, gold, silver,
machinery and electronics. The wider CAD was
financed comfortably with an improvement in
capital flows, particularly on account of a
marked increase in FDI inflows. Going forward,
the external sector is expected to remain
manageable although the upside risks to CAD
have increased arising from slowing global
economy and debt-related stress in euro area,
in particular.
Trade deficit widened in spite of high
export growth
III.2 Merchandise exports grew at a higher than
anticipated rate during April-September 2011
reflecting continued diversification in terms of commodities as well as export destinations. The
rise in exports was particularly on account of
engineering goods (103 per cent) and petroleum
& oil products (53 per cent). However, during
this period, there was a sharp rise in imports as
well, which led to the widening of the trade
deficit. The high growth in imports stemmed
from an increase in oil imports (42 per cent)
and non-oil import items, viz., gold and silver
(80 per cent), machinery (34 per cent),
electronics (33 per cent) and organic and
inorganic chemicals (26 per cent). Notably, nonoil
trade deficit remained unchanged in nominal
terms (Table III.1 and Chart III.1).
Exports may slowdown ahead in a tougher
climate
III.3 India’s export growth has shown
unexpected buoyancy in recent months, despite
the slowdown in advanced economies (AEs)
and rising global uncertainty (Table III.2). This, among others, was a reflection of the continued
diversification of India’s exports to other
emerging and developing economies (EDEs)
where growth buoyancy was still intact as also
the domestic trade policies intended to support
exports. However, the slowing of AEs, with
some weakening of growth prospects of EDEs,
may weigh on India’s exports in subsequent
months.
Table III.1: India’s Merchandise Trade |
(US$ billion) |
Item |
2009-10 (R) |
2010-11 (P) |
April-September (P) |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Exports |
178.8 |
-2.2 |
254.4 |
42.3 |
105.4 |
30.1 |
160.0 |
51.8 |
Oil |
28.2 |
2.3 |
41.9 |
48.7 |
17.7 |
63.9 |
27.0 |
52.5 |
Non-oil |
150.6 |
-3.0 |
212.5 |
41.1 |
87.7 |
24.9 |
133.0 |
51.7 |
Imports |
288.4 |
-3.5 |
352.6 |
22.3 |
167.2 |
30.5 |
233.5 |
39.7 |
Oil |
87.1 |
-7.0 |
106.1 |
21.7 |
49.4 |
31.7 |
70.4 |
42.5 |
Non-oil |
201.3 |
-1.9 |
246.5 |
22.5 |
117.8 |
29.9 |
163.1 |
38.5 |
Trade Deficit |
-109.6 |
-5.5 |
-98.2 |
-10.4 |
-61.8 |
30.9 |
-73.5 |
18.9 |
Non-oil Trade Deficit |
-50.6 |
1.4 |
-34.0 |
-32.8 |
-30.1 |
46.8 |
-30.1 |
0.0 |
R: Revised. P: Provisional.
Source : DGCI&S.
|
Global trade may decelerate on weakening
global demand and rising risk aversion
III.4 The growth in global trade has remained
volatile reflecting the uncertain global
environment (Chart III.2). Both the IMF and
the WTO have projected a lower growth in
world trade volume reflecting weakening global
demand. The IMF has reduced its earlier
forecast for world goods and services trade from
8.2 per cent to 7.5 per cent for 2011 and further to 5.8 per cent for 2012. The WTO has lowered
its forecast for merchandise trade volume
growth to 5.8 per cent in 2011 from its previous
estimate of 6.5 per cent.
Growth in services exports may also
decelerate
III.5 The surplus on account of invisibles
continued to finance around 60 per cent of the
merchandise trade deficit in Q1 of 2011-12.
Within services, export of software services
continued to grow in Q1, though at a lower rate
than during the previous quarter. Private
transfers, representing workers’ remittances
from abroad, remained marginally higher in Q1
than in the corresponding quarter of the previous
year despite uncertainties in source countries.
The decline in investment income, reflecting
lower interest rates abroad, also impacted the
overall net receipts on account of invisibles (Table III.3). In the coming quarters, a
slowdown in the US and the euro area may have
some impact for exports of invisibles,
particularly software services, as was evident
during Q4 of 2008-09 to Q2 of 2009-10.
Table III.2: India’s Balance of Payments |
(US $ billion) |
|
2009-10 (PR) |
2010-11 (P) |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
Q1(PR) |
Q2(PR) |
Q3(PR) |
Q4(PR) |
Q1(P) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
1. |
Exports |
182.2 |
250.5 |
55.3 |
52.0 |
65.9 |
77.2 |
80.6 |
2. |
Imports |
300.6 |
380.9 |
87.2 |
89.3 |
97.4 |
107.1 |
116.1 |
3. |
Trade Balance (1-2) |
-118.4 |
-130.5 |
-31.9 |
-37.3 |
-31.5 |
-29.9 |
-35.5 |
4. |
Net Invisibles |
80.0 |
86.2 |
19.8 |
20.5 |
21.5 |
24.5 |
21.3 |
5. |
Current Account Balance (3+4) |
-38.4 |
-44.3 |
-12.1 |
-16.8 |
-10.0 |
-5.4 |
-14.2 |
6. |
Gross Capital Inflows |
345.7 |
496.0 |
94.5 |
112.1 |
173.7 |
115.7 |
127.3 |
7. |
Gross Capital Outflows |
292.3 |
436.3 |
77.7 |
90.8 |
160.3 |
107.5 |
106.4 |
8. |
Net Capital Account (6-7) |
53.4 |
59.7 |
16.8 |
21.4 |
13.4 |
8.2 |
20.9 |
9. |
Overall Balance (5+8)# |
13.4 |
13.0 |
3.7 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
5.4 |
#: Overall balance also includes errors and omissions apart from items 5 and 8.
P: Provisional. PR: Partially Revised. |
Sharp decline in FII flows largely offset
by strong FDI flows in Q2 of 2011-12
III.6 So far in 2011-12, capital inflows have
exhibited an uptrend, mainly on account of
robust FDI inflows and rise in external
commercial borrowings (ECBs) and trade
credit. FDI inflows were almost double the level
recorded during the corresponding period of
2010-11 while ECBs also registered healthy
growth (Table III.4). However, net FII inflows
have not only been volatile but also significantly low up to October 14, 2011. Volatility in FII
inflows witnessed in Q2 mainly reflected
concerns of a double-dip recession in the US
and a worsening debt crisis in the euro area.
During Q1 of 2011-12, the surplus on capital
account at US$ 20.9 billion was more than
adequate for financing the higher CAD at US$
14.5 billion (Table III.5).
Table III.3: Net Invisibles |
(US $ billion) |
Item |
April-March |
April-June |
2009-10 (PR) |
2010-11 (P) |
2010-11 (PR) |
2011-12 (P) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
A. Services |
35.7 |
47.7 |
9.6 |
12.1 |
Of which |
|
|
|
|
Travel |
2.5 |
4.0 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
Transportation |
-0.8 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Software |
48.2 |
56.8 |
12.5 |
14.2 |
Business Services |
-6.7 |
-3.8 |
-1.1 |
-1.0 |
Financial Services |
-0.9 |
-1.0 |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
B. Transfers (Private) |
52.1 |
53.4 |
13.1 |
13.7 |
C. Income |
-8.0 |
-14.9 |
-2.9 |
-4.3 |
Investment Income |
-7.2 |
-13.9 |
-2.6 |
-4.2 |
Compensation of employee |
-0.8 |
-1.0 |
-0.3 |
-0.1 |
Invisibles (A+B+C) |
80.0 |
86.2 |
19.8 |
21.3 |
P: Provisional. PR: Partially Revised. |
Table III.4: Capital Flows in 2011-12 so far |
(US $ billion) |
Component |
Period |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FDI to India |
April-August |
11.7 |
21.0 |
FIIs (net) |
April-Oct. 14 |
27.5 |
0.6 |
ADRs/GDRs |
April-August |
1.5 |
0.3 |
ECB Approvals |
April-August |
7.5 |
15.9 |
NRI Deposits (net) |
April-August |
1.9 |
2.1 |
FDI : Foreign Direct Investment.
FII : Foreign Institutional Investment.
ECB : External Commercial Borrowings.
NRI : Non Resident Indians.
ADR : American Depository Receipts.
GDR : Global Depository Receipts. |
Overall capital flows to emerging markets
entering an uncertain phase
III.7 EDEs are facing a general rise in volatility
of capital flows with resurfacing of global
downside risks and even the possibility of a
reversal of such flows under extreme
circumstances cannot be ruled out. The
possibility of contagion from the euro area
banking system to the EDEs remains high. This
can operate through adverse impact on the
balance sheets of the subsidiaries of European
banks operating in the EDEs and due to
investment funds liquidating their positions
because of any losses on assets in AEs. Going
forward, in context of India, buoyancy in FDI
inflows may continue during the second half of
2011-12, as projects attracting significant FDI
are already in the pipeline. Uncertainty remains,
however, regarding portfolio flows, which are
by nature volatile.
Debt creating capital flows also uncertain
in spite of widening interest rate
differential
III.8 During 2011-12 so far, ECBs registered
healthy growth and NRI deposits also showed marginal increase. The ECB policy was further
rationalised and liberalised in September 2011.
The increase in the annual limit for eligible
borrowers under the automatic route may help
in sustaining the uptrend in ECBs in the coming
quarters of 2011-12. However, euro imbroglio,
if continues, may affect the availability and cost
of debt creating flows.
Table III.5: Net Capital Flows |
(US $ billion) |
Item |
April-March |
April-June |
2009-10 (PR) |
2010-11 (P) |
2010-11 (P) |
2011-12 (P) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Net Capital flows |
53.4 |
59.7 |
16.8 |
20.9 |
Of which |
|
|
|
|
1. Foreign Direct Investment |
18.8 |
7.1 |
2.9 |
7.2 |
Inward FDI |
33.1 |
23.4 |
6.1 |
12.9 |
Outward FDI |
-14.4 |
-16.2 |
-3.2 |
-5.7 |
2. Portfolio Investment |
32.4 |
30.3 |
4.6 |
2.5 |
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
FIIs |
29.0 |
29.4 |
3.5 |
2.5 |
ADR/GDRs |
3.3 |
2.0 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
3. External Assistance |
2.9 |
4.9 |
2.5 |
0.4 |
4. External Commercial Borrowings |
2.8 |
11.9 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
5. NRI Deposits |
2.9 |
3.2 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
6. Short-term Trade Credit |
7.6 |
11.0 |
4.3 |
3.1 |
P: Preliminary. PR: Partially Revised. |
Rupee sees significant nominal and real
depreciation in Q2 of 2011-12
III.9 Based on narrow as well as broad
currency baskets (i.e., 6, 30 and 36 currency
baskets), the Indian rupee depreciated sharply
over end-March 2011 both in nominal and real
terms (Table III.6).
Table III.6: Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates-Trade Based |
(Base: 2004-05=100) |
(Per cent, appreciation+/depreciation-) |
|
Index Oct. 14, 2011 P |
Year-on-Year Variation (Average) |
2011-12 (P) (Oct. 14 over end-Mar.) |
2008-09 |
2009- 10 P |
2010-11 P |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
36-REER |
99.5 |
-9.9 |
-3.1 |
7.9 |
-4.1 |
36-NEER |
85.5 |
-10.9 |
-2.6 |
2.9 |
-8.0 |
30-REER |
92.4 |
-10.2 |
-4.6 |
4.5 |
-2.0 |
30-NEER |
87.9 |
-8.4 |
-2.2 |
1.1 |
-7.1 |
6-REER |
109.7 |
-9.3 |
-0.3 |
13.0 |
-6.3 |
6-NEER |
82.7 |
-13.6 |
-3.7 |
5.6 |
-9.0 |
`/USD (Average) |
45.3 |
-12.4 |
-3.2 |
4.0 |
1.7# |
`/USD (end-March) |
49.1* |
-21.5 |
12.9 |
1.1 |
-9.1 |
NEER: Nominal Effective Exchange Rate. REER: Real Effective Exchange Rate. P: Provisional.
*: As on October 18, 2011. #: Apr. – Sept. 2011 over Apr. – Sept. 2010.
Note: Rise in indices indicates appreciation of the rupee and vice versa. |
External vulnerability indicators portray
a mixed picture
III.10 India’s external debt stock as at end-June
2011 showed an increase of US$10.4 billion
over the level as at end-March 2011 mainly on
account of ECBs reflecting interest rate
differential and short-term trade credit reflecting
surge in imports (Table III.7).
III.11 The key debt sustainability indicators,
such as ratio of short-term debt to total external
debt, ratio of short-term debt to reserves, and
debt service ratio marginally worsened due to
the continued dominance of debt creating flows.
However, other indicators, viz., reserves cover
for imports and debt service payments improved during Q1 of 2011-12 (Table III.8). Going
forward, debt flows may increase further due
to persistence of interest rate differentials,
higher annual ceiling for ECBs under the
automatic route for corporates in specified
sectors and liberalisation of investment by
FIIs in corporate bonds for the infrastructure
sector.
Table III.7: India’s External Debt |
(US$ billion) |
Item |
End-March 2010 PR |
End-March 2011 P |
End-June 2011 P |
Variation (End-June 2011
over End-March 2011) |
Amount |
Per cent |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1. Multilateral |
42.9 |
48.5 |
49.4 |
0.9 |
1.9 |
2. Bilateral |
22.6 |
25.8 |
26.3 |
0.5 |
1.9 |
3. International Monetary Fund |
6.0 |
6.3 |
6.4 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
4. Trade Credit (above 1 year) |
16.9 |
18.6 |
18.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
5. External Commercial Borrowings |
70.8 |
88.9 |
93.2 |
4.3 |
4.8 |
6. NRI Deposits |
47.9 |
51.7 |
52.9 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
7. Rupee Debt |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
-2.1 |
8. Long-term (1 to 7) |
208.7 |
241.5 |
248.4 |
6.9 |
2.9 |
9. Short-term |
52.3 |
65.0 |
68.5 |
3.5 |
5.4 |
Total (8+9) |
261.0 |
306.4 |
316.9 |
10.5 |
3.4 |
P: Provisional. PR: Partially Revised. |
External sector outlook, although stable,
warrants close monitoring
III.12 With progressive diversification both in
terms of commodities as well as destinations,
exports during the year so far (up to September
2011) have grown faster than imports and net
services also continue to grow albeit at moderate
pace. However, owing to increasing uncertainty
in growth prospects of US and European
economies, the growth momentum in exports
seen so far may not be sustained and growth in
services exports may also remain moderate in
the coming months. While uncertain global
economic and financial prospects underpinned volatile international price of crude oil, some
moderation in prices due to downward revision
in global oil demand in coming period may
provide some relief.
III.13Trends in capital inflows so far suggest
that the economy has received sufficient flows
to finance CAD during the first half of 2011-
12. Although there has been a marked decline
in net FII flows, a significant pick up in FDI
inflows augurs well from the sustainability point
of view. Going forward, capital flows into India
will depend on how the economic and financial
conditions in AEs, particularly the US and the
euro area, evolve during the second half and
whether relative growth and interest rate
differential would suffice to outweigh the
general risk perception among foreign investors.
It is, therefore, important to encourage FDI
inflows to impart stability to India’s capital
account. Overall, the balance of payments
outlook for 2011-12, although stable, warrants
close monitoring.
Table III.8: External Sector Vulnerability Indicators |
(Per cent) |
Indicator |
End-March 2010 |
End-June 2010 |
End-March 2011 |
End-June 2011 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1. Ratio of Total Debt to GDP |
18.0 |
– |
17.4 |
– |
2. Ratio of Short-term to Total Debt (Original Maturity) |
20.0 |
21.2 |
21.2 |
21.6 |
3. Ratio of Short-term to Total Debt (Residual Maturity) |
41.2 |
42.5 |
42.2 |
43.3 |
4. Ratio of Concessional Debt to Total Debt |
16.8 |
15.9 |
15.5 |
15.1 |
5. Ratio of Reserves to Total Debt |
106.9 |
98.0 |
99.5 |
99.6 |
6. Ratio of Short-term Debt to Reserves |
18.8 |
21.0 |
21.3 |
21.7 |
7. Reserves Cover for Imports (in months) |
11.1 |
10.7 |
9.6 |
10.0 |
8. Reserves Cover for Imports and Debt Service Payments (in months) |
10.5 |
10.1 |
9.2 |
9.5 |
9. Debt Service Ratio (Debt Service Payments to Current Receipts) |
5.5 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
|