Early indicators suggest that pressure on current account deficit (CAD) and its financing
persisted through Q3 of 2011-12, while capital inflows turned weaker. CAD is expected to widen
during the year despite a faster rate of growth of exports compared with imports during the first
half. Import demand has remained strong, notwithstanding rupee depreciation, reflecting the
inelastic demand for oil and increasing gold demand. The composition of capital inflows shifted
in favour of debt, with a rise in the proportion of short-term flows. Widening CAD, diminishing
capital flows and moderately deteriorating vulnerability indicators, notwithstanding improved
net international investment position (NIIP), warrant acceleration of the domestic reform
process. This will encourage renewed equity flows.
Overall external sector outlook deteriorates
III.1 The rising uncertainties associated
with the euro zone sovereign debt crisis, the
slowdown in advanced economies (AEs)
and the weakening domestic economy have
contributed to deterioration of India’s external
sector outlook in terms of current account
balance, capital flows and vulnerability
indicators. Despite depreciating rupee, if
moderation in export growth observed in Q3
of 2011-12 persists and imports stay closer to
prevailing trend amidst insufficient elasticity
responses in the short run, the trade deficit
is likely to remain high. Even as the rupee
depreciation may improve flow of remittances,
the current account deficit (CAD) is likely to
widen further in Q3 of 2011-12 before possible contraction in Q4 reflecting the seasonal
pattern, leaving the full-year CAD wider.
Furthermore, with rupee stabilising since the
latter half of December, equity investment
inflows are starting to come back.
Slippage in export performance likely as
global growth and trade slows again
III.2 India’s merchandise exports may fall
short of the target of US$ 300 billion set for
2011-12 as global trade has slowed down again
amidst global financial market uncertainties and
the weakening demand conditions in advanced
economies. After performing well during the
first half of 2011-12, merchandise exports
decelerated in Q3 of 2011 (Table III.1 and
Chart III.1a).1 Austerity measures undertaken by the European economies and decline in
consumption expenditure may further impact
India’s exports in the coming period. Notably,
in 2010-11, exports grew strongly on the back
of market and product diversification measures
by the government which helped raise the
elasticity of India’s exports to world GDP. The
sluggishness of advanced economies (AEs)
is, however, now proving to be a dampener
to the trade volume growth of emerging
and developing economies (EDEs). Against
this global backdrop, measures aimed at
diversification of India’s export markets may
have limited impact in the short-term.
Table III.1 : India’s Merchandise Trade |
(US$ billion) |
Item |
2009-10 (R) |
2010-11 (P) |
April-December |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
Absolute |
Growth (%) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Exports |
178.8 |
-3.5 |
250.1 |
39.9 |
173.0 |
36.0 |
217.6 |
25.8 |
Of which: Oil |
28.2 |
2.3 |
41.4 |
46.8 |
28.3 |
45.3 |
43.9 |
55.0 |
Non-oil |
150.6 |
-4.6 |
208.7 |
38.6 |
144.7 |
32.8 |
173.7 |
20.1 |
Imports |
288.4 |
-5.0 |
369.8 |
28.2 |
269.1 |
29.8 |
350.9 |
30.4 |
Of which: Oil |
87.1 |
-7.0 |
104.0 |
19.4 |
75.2 |
22.0 |
105.6 |
40.4 |
Non-oil |
201.3 |
-4.2 |
265.8 |
32.0 |
193.9 |
33.1 |
245.3 |
26.5 |
Trade Deficit |
-109.6 |
|
-119.7 |
|
-96.1 |
|
-133.3 |
|
Non-oil Trade Deficit |
-50.7 |
|
-57.1 |
|
-49.2 |
|
-71.6 |
|
R: Revised. P: Provisional.
Source: DGCI&S. |
Inelastic import demand for oil and gold
widens the trade deficit
III.3 The widening trade deficit recorded up
to December 2011 was largely driven by imports
of ‘oil’ and ‘gold and silver’. Import of oil is
relatively inelastic to changes in international
prices and exchange rate. On the other hand,
apart from traditional purposes, demand for gold
as an investment asset appears to have increased
in the recent period. The rise in import of
petroleum, oil and lubricants (POL) is largely
reflective of increase in international oil prices
(Chart III.1b). While the average international
price of Indian oil basket increased by 38.6 per
cent during April-December 2011 over April-
December 2010, imports of POL (in value
terms) expanded by 40.1 per cent during the
same period. Similarly, there has been sharp
increase in import of gold and silver by 53.8 per cent during April-December 2011. Estimates
based on disaggregated data available up to
September 2011 reveal that the rise in gold
import has been both on account of price as well
as quantum factors. During April-September
2011, quantum of gold import is estimated to
have risen by 25.1 per cent to 554 million tonnes
and international prices of gold on average
during the same period rose by 31.1 per cent to
US$ 1607 per troy ounce.
Upward risks to CAD become more
pronounced with likely moderation of
software earnings - the mainstay of services
III.4 The increase in global economic
uncertainties has amplified the risks to CAD
(Table III.4). While weaker demand for
merchandise exports along with inelastic oil
and gold imports may further widen the trade
deficit, CAD may, in addition, be prone to risks
emanating from moderation in receipts on
account of software exports, business services
and investment income. If euro area debt crisis
remains unresolved and contagion spreads to
other AEs, companies in US and EU countries
could reduce their IT budgets which may
affect prospects for India’s software exports.
Similarly, weakening of economic activity
in AEs can lead to a downtrend in business
services as was observed during Q4 of 2008-09
to Q4 of 2009-10. As a result, CAD is expected
to remain under pressure after having widened
sequentially to 3.7 per cent of GDP in Q2 of
2011-12 from 3.4 per cent in Q1 of 2011-12
(Table III.2).
Table III.2 :Major Items of India’s Balance of Payments |
(US$ billion) |
|
2010-11
(PR) |
2010-11 (PR) |
2011-12 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 (PR) |
Q2 (P) |
1. Goods exports |
250.6 |
55.2 |
52.0 |
66.0 |
77.4 |
74.4 |
76.6 |
2. Goods Imports |
381.1 |
87.2 |
89.0 |
97.4 |
107.4 |
116.1 |
120.5 |
3. Trade Balance(1-2) |
-130.4 |
-32.0 |
-37.0 |
-31.4 |
-30.0 |
-41.7 |
-43.9 |
4. Services Exports |
131.7 |
26.5 |
31.1 |
38.8 |
35.3 |
33.3 |
34.0 |
5. Services Imports |
83.0 |
16.7 |
19.2 |
26.3 |
20.7 |
17.9 |
18.5 |
6. Net Services (4-5) |
48.7 |
9.7 |
11.9 |
12.5 |
14.6 |
15.4 |
15.5 |
7. Goods & Services Balances (3+6) |
-81.8 |
-22.3 |
-25.1 |
-19.0 |
-15.5 |
-26.3 |
-28.4 |
8. Primary Income, Net (Compensation of Employees and Investment Income) |
-17.3 |
-3.5 |
-4.8 |
-4.6 |
-4.5 |
-4.4 |
-4.7 |
9. Secondary Income, Net (Pvt. Transfers) |
53.1 |
13.1 |
13.0 |
13.4 |
13.6 |
14.8 |
16.2 |
10. Net Income (8+9) |
35.8 |
9.6 |
8.2 |
8.8 |
9.1 |
10.4 |
11.5 |
11. Current Account Balance (7+10) |
-46.0 |
-12.6 |
-16.9 |
-10.1 |
-6.3 |
-15.8 |
-16.9 |
12. Capital and Finance Account, Net
(Excl. changes in reserves) |
62.0 |
17.2 |
21.6 |
14.0 |
9.1 |
22.5 |
18.4 |
13. Change in Reserves (-) increase/(+) decrease |
-13.1 |
-3.7 |
-3.3 |
-4.0 |
-2.0 |
-5.4 |
-0.3 |
14. Errors & Omissions -(11+12+13) |
-3.0 |
-0.9 |
-1.4 |
0.1 |
-0.8 |
-1.3 |
-1.2 |
Memo Items (As percentage of GDP): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Trade Balance |
-7.5 |
-8.3 |
-9.5 |
-6.8 |
-6.1 |
-9.0 |
-9.6 |
16. Net Services |
2.8 |
2.5 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
17. Net Income |
2.1 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
18. Current Account Balance |
-2.7 |
-3.3 |
-4.4 |
-2.2 |
-1.3 |
-3.4 |
-3.7 |
19. Capital and Finance Account, Net |
3.6 |
4.5 |
5.6 |
3.0 |
1.9 |
4.9 |
4.0 |
Note: Total of subcomponents may not tally with aggregate due to rounding off.
P: Preliminary. PR: Partially Revised. |
Likely shift in financing pattern of CAD as
equity flows turned weak
III.5 Risk aversion in the global financial
markets has slackened the pace of capital flows
to India (Table III.3). FDI inflows remained
robust averaging US$ 4.9 billion per month
during April-August 2011 but moderated to
US$ 3.2 billion per month during September-
November 2011 (Table III.4). If the pace of FDI
inflows does not pick up once again and FII
equity inflows revert to the decelerating trend,
CAD may have to be largely financed through
debt creating flows in the coming quarters.
Recent pick up in FII flows has been mainly
on account of investment in debt instruments.
Even the debt creating capital inflows are
subject to risk aversion
III.6 Several measures have been undertaken
to improve inflows of external commercial
borrowings (ECBs) and NRI deposits. While inflows on account of NR(E)RA and NRO
accounts were higher during April-December
2011, the same on account of FCNR (B)
accounts were negative. ECBs and FCCBs
by Indian companies due for redemption in
Q4 of 2011-12 are estimated to be less than
US$ 4 billion. Recognising the global macroeconomic
and financial market conditions,
the Reserve Bank raised all-in-cost ceiling on
ECBs. The increase in the all-in-cost ceiling,
and emphasis on bringing immediately
the proceeds of the ECBs meant for rupee
expenditure in India, augur well for raising
overseas borrowings and financing the CAD.
Also, greater flexibility has been given to
banks in mobilising non-resident deposits by
further deregulating interest rates on NRE and
NRO accounts.
Table III.3: Net Financial Account |
(US$ billion) |
|
April-June
2011 (PR) |
April-June
2010 (PR) |
July-September
2011 (P) |
July-September
2010 (PR) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1. Direct Investment (net) |
7.9 |
3.5 |
4.4 |
3.6 |
1.a Direct Investment to India |
13.3 |
6.7 |
7.3 |
7.5 |
1.b Direct Investment by India |
-5.4 |
-3.3 |
-2.9 |
-3.9 |
2. Portfolio Investment (net) |
2.3 |
3.5 |
-1.4 |
18.7 |
2.a Portfolio Investment in India |
2.5 |
3.5 |
-1.6 |
18.8 |
2.b Portfolio Investment by India |
-0.2 |
0 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
3. Other investment (3.a+3.b+3.c+3.d+3.e) |
12.6 |
10.4 |
15.2 |
-0.7 |
3.a Other equity (ADRs/GDRs) |
0.3 |
1.1 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
3.b Currency and deposits |
1.2 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
0.4 |
Deposit-taking corporations (NRI Deposits) |
1.2 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
1.0 |
3.c Loans (net)* |
15.5 |
7.6 |
11.3 |
0.4 |
3.c.i. Loans to India |
15.5 |
7.7 |
10.6 |
0.7 |
Deposit-taking corporations |
11.5 |
2.9 |
3.9 |
-3.6 |
General government (External Assistance) |
0.4 |
2.5 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
Other sectors (ECBs) |
3.6 |
2.3 |
6.4 |
3.7 |
3.c.ii Loans by India |
- |
-0.1 |
0.6 |
-0.3 |
Other sectors (ECBs) |
- |
-0.1 |
0.6 |
-0.3 |
3.d Trade credit and advances |
3.1 |
4.3 |
2.9 |
2.6 |
3.e Other accounts receivable/payable |
-7.4 |
-3.7 |
-1.9 |
-4.6 |
4. Reserve assets |
-5.4 |
-3.7 |
-0.3 |
-3.3 |
Financial Account (1+2+3+4) |
17.4 |
13.6 |
17.9 |
18.3 |
Note: Total of subcomponents may not tally with aggregate due to rounding off.
P: Preliminary. PR: Partially Revised. (-) : nil/negligibles
*: includes External Assistance, ECBs and non-NRI Banking Capital. |
III.7 Although recent measures by the
European Central Bank and other central
banks may have eased financing conditions for banks in the euro area, deleveraging by
some European banks has begun to affect
cross-border lending to the emerging markets.
Therefore, actual ECB inflows in the coming
quarters would largely depend on risk
perception of European banks. If risk aversion
persists in the global financial markets,
there might be some implications for cost of
obtaining external funding.
Table III.4: Capital Flows in 2011-12 |
(US$ billion) |
Component |
2011-12 |
2011-12 |
(Apr.-Aug.) |
(Sep.-Dec.) |
(Monthly Average) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
FDI to India* |
4.9 |
3.2 |
FDI by India |
1.0 |
0.8 |
FIIs (net) |
0.4 |
0.1 |
ADRs/GDRs |
0.1 |
0.1 |
ECB Inflows (net) |
1.3 |
0.6 |
NRI Deposits (net) |
0.5 |
1.2 |
* : April-November. |
Flight to dollar cause currency pressures in
many emerging markets
III.8 Declining risk tolerance of investors
resulted in a flight to the US dollar as a
global safe haven currency. Dollar value
generally strengthened, especially against
EDE currencies. Currencies of the EDEs
running current account deficit came under
significant pressure, when compared with
those with current account surplus EDEs
(Chart III.2). Some central banks, including
those of Brazil, Russia and South Korea, have
intervened in currency markets to smoothen
exchange-rate volatility. Until risk aversion
subsides, EDE currencies may continue to
remain under pressure. With higher CAD and
subdued capital flows during 2011-12 so far,
the depreciation of the Indian rupee reflected
interplay of forces operating through the trade,
capital and confidence channels.
Depreciation in REER as rupee weakens in
nominal terms
III.9 The real effective exchange rate (i.e.,
REER based on 6, 30 and 36 currency baskets)
continued to show depreciating trend in Q3
reflecting sharp depreciation of the rupee in
nominal terms. The indices, however, recorded
an appreciation in January so far (up to January
13, 2012) as rupee appreciated in nominal
terms during the same period (Table III.5).
Table III.5: Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates - Trade Based |
(Base: 2004-05=100) |
(Per cent, appreciation+/depreciation-) |
|
Index
Jan.13, 2012P |
Year-on-Year
Variation (Average) |
2011-12
(end-July over March) |
2011-12
(Jan. 13 over end-July) |
2008-09 |
2009 10 |
2010-11P |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
36-REER |
94.2 |
-9.9 |
-3.1 |
8.0 |
1.2 |
-10.0 |
36-NEER |
83.1 |
-10.9 |
-2.6 |
3.0 |
-0.2 |
-10.5 |
30-REER |
86.0 |
-10.3 |
-4.6 |
4.8 |
1.7 |
-10.1 |
30-NEER |
85.1 |
-8.4 |
-2.2 |
1.1 |
-0.3 |
-9.9 |
6-REER |
107.2 |
-9.3 |
-0.3 |
13.1 |
1.2 |
-9.8 |
6-NEER |
80.7 |
-13.6 |
-3.7 |
5.7 |
-0.1 |
-10.9 |
`/US$ (Average) |
47.4 |
-12.4 |
-3.2 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
-3.8# |
`/US$ (end-March) |
50.7* |
-21.5 |
12.9 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
-11.9* |
NEER: Nominal Effective Exchange Rate.
REER: Real Effective Exchange Rate.
P: Provisional. *: As on January 18, 2012.
#: April-January 13, 2012 over April-January 13, 2011. |
Depreciation of the rupee and decline in
equity indices can have a balance sheet
impact
III.10 Due to subdued sentiments in the Indian
equity market, Indian companies may require
to plan innovatively to facilitate conversion
of FCCBs into equity. This is to guard against
consequent deterioration in the debt-equity
ratio which may have a balance sheet impact.
Amidst rising fragilities and uncertainties
surrounding the global economic outlook,
rolling over of overseas borrowings of Indian
companies may become more expensive.
Furthermore, the depreciating rupee may also
offset the advantage of interest rate differential
between domestic and overseas borrowings and impact the balance sheet of corporates.
It is incumbent upon corporates to suitably
hedge their receivables and payables against
exchange rate volatilities.
External debt may rise but will remain
manageable
III.11 The rise in external debt from US$ 306.4
billion at end-March 2011 to US$ 326.6 billion
at end-September 2011 is largely attributed
to the increase in ECBs, export credits and
short-term debt (Table III.6). With increasing
recourse to debt creating flows for financing
the CAD, India’s external debt is likely to rise
further. Increased flows on account of ECBs
and NRI deposits may have some implications
for India’s external debt in coming quarters.
Nonetheless, it is expected that external debt
will remain manageable. India’s non-debt
external capital being large, the strong longterm
growth could make external debt rollovers
relatively smooth.
Table III.6: India’s External Debt |
(US$ billion) |
Item |
End-Mar 2011
PR |
End-Jun 2011
PR |
End-Sep 2011
P |
Variation
(End-Sep. 2011 over End-Jun 2011) |
Amount |
Per cent |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1. Multilateral |
48.5 |
49.4 |
49.1 |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
2. Bilateral |
25.8 |
26.3 |
27.3 |
1.0 |
3.7 |
3. International Monetary Fund |
6.3 |
6.4 |
6.2 |
-0.2 |
-2.4 |
4. Trade Credit (above 1 year) |
18.6 |
18.7 |
19.7 |
1.0 |
5.3 |
5. External Commercial Borrowings |
88.9 |
93.8 |
99.0 |
5.3 |
5.6 |
6. NRI Deposits |
51.7 |
52.9 |
52.3 |
-0.6 |
-1.1 |
7. Rupee Debt |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
-0.1 |
-9.3 |
8. Long-term (1 to 7) |
241.4 |
249.0 |
255.1 |
6.1 |
2.4 |
9. Short-term |
65.0 |
68.5 |
71.5 |
3.1 |
4.5 |
Total (8+9) |
306.4 |
317.5 |
326.6 |
9.1 |
2.9 |
P: Provisional. PR: Partially Revised. |
External vulnerability indicators worsened
marginally
III.12 There was marginal decline in some
external sector vulnerability indicators in Q2 of 2011-12 (Table III.7). The reserve cover of
imports was lower as at end-September 2011
and the ratio of short-term external debt to
total external debt also increased marginally.
However, India’s Net International Investment
Position (IIP) showed an improvement as net
international liabilities declined to US$ 224.9
billion at end-September 2011 from US$
237.5 billion at end-June 2011 (Table III.8).
As a result, the declining trend in the ratio of
India’s net international financial liabilities to
GDP continued in Q2 of 2011-12. The decline mainly reflected valuation changes emanating
from exchange rate movements.
Table III.7: External Sector Vulnerability Indicators |
(Per cent) |
Indicator |
End-March 2010 |
End-June 2010 |
End-March 2011 |
End-June 2011 |
End-Sep 2011 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1. Ratio of Total Debt to GDP* |
18.0 |
17.6 |
17.4 |
17.2 |
17.8 |
2. Ratio of Short-term to Total Debt (Original Maturity) |
20.0 |
20.9 |
21.2 |
21.6 |
21.9 |
3. Ratio of Short-term to Total Debt (Residual Maturity) |
41.2 |
42.5 |
42.2 |
43.3 |
43.4# |
4. Ratio of Concessional Debt to Total Debt |
16.8 |
15.9 |
15.5 |
15.1 |
14.7 |
5. Ratio of Reserves to Total Debt |
106.9 |
98.0 |
99.5 |
99.6 |
95.4 |
6. Ratio of Short-term Debt to Reserves (Original Maturity) |
18.8 |
21.0 |
21.3 |
21.7 |
22.9 |
7. Ratio of Short-term Debt to Reserves (Residual Maturity) |
38.6 |
42.1 |
42.3 |
43.5 |
45.5# |
7. Reserves Cover of Imports (in months) |
11.1 |
10.7 |
9.6 |
9.2 |
8.5 |
8. Reserves Cover of Imports and Debt Service Payments (in months) |
10.5 |
10.1 |
9.1 |
8.8 |
8.0 |
9. Debt Service Ratio (Debt Service Payments to Current Receipts) |
5.8 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.7 |
4.9 |
10. External Debt (US$ billion) |
261.0 |
270.3 |
306.4 |
317.5 |
326.6 |
* : Ratios for end-June 2010, end-June 2011 and end-September 2011 are based on annualised GDP.
# : RBI Estimate. |
Table III.8: Overall International Investment Position of India |
(US $ billion) |
Period |
Sep-10
(PR) |
Dec-10
(PR) |
Mar-11
(PR) |
Jun-11
(PR) |
Sep-11
(P) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Net IIP |
-205.0 |
-221.8 |
-224.3 |
-237.5 |
-224.9 |
Assets |
406.9 |
412.0 |
426.6 |
438.8 |
434.7 |
Liabilities |
611.9 |
633.7 |
650.9 |
676.3 |
659.6 |
Net IIP / GDP ratio |
-13.3 |
-13.5 |
-13.0 |
-12.9 |
-12.3 |
P: Provisional. PR: Partially Revised.
Note: Based on annualised GDP. |
Adjustment necessary through absorption
and expenditure-switching policies
III.13 The rising CAD is expected to correct
with a lag as exports respond to a weaker rupee,
while import demand dampens with exchange
rate pass-through. Decelerating aggregate
demand should also help to contain CAD.
However, if this adjustment is delayed in an
uncertain global environment, policy responses may become necessary. Both expenditure
reducing and expenditure switching policies
may be necessary in this setting.
III.14 The depreciation of exchange rate since
August 2011 itself would have a favourable
impact on exports during 2012-13. However,
keeping in view the dominance of inelastic importable items in India’s import basket,
and presence of imperfect labour markets,
expenditure switching policies may not
necessarily bring about the desired adjustment
in CAD. Further, to restrain the oil demand,
further deregulation of prices of petroleum
products may be expedited. Also, fiscal
spending may need to be restrained so that
absorption is contained and twin deficits do
not feed on one another.
III.15 Close monitoring of the short-term
external debt will be required in 2012-13. On
the capital account, recent policy measures
have stimulated debt capital flows in the form
of investments by FIIs in debt instruments
and NRI deposits. Going forward, however, it
would be necessary to reduce dependence on
debt inflows and accelerate the reform process
in order to ensure revival of equity flows as
investors look for strong growth opportunities
in an otherwise gloomy global environment.
|