Headline inflation decelerated to a two-year low of 7.5 per cent in December 2011 driven by
sharp decline in food inflation. While the inflation path is broadly evolving in line with the
7 per cent projection for March 2012, upside risks persist. They come from the insufficient
supply responses, exchange rate pass-through and suppressed inflation in the energy segment.
Inflation in non-food manufactured products remains persistently high, reflecting input cost
pressures, as the impact of imported inflation resulting from the rupee depreciation more
than offset the sobering impact of weakening domestic demand and softer global commodity
prices. Primary food inflation declined sharply and turned negative reflecting seasonal fall
in vegetable prices and high base, and hence, this phase is expected to be short-lived. High
protein inflation continues due to structural demand-supply imbalances.
Global inflation expected to ease as
growth risks amplify
VI.1 Inflation worldwide is still exhibiting
divergent trends. Faster recovery in emerging
and developing economies (EDEs) after the
crisis led to a resurgence of CPI inflation
in 2010 in these countries, while inflation
remained subdued in the advanced economies
(AEs). In 2011, especially in the recent months,
inflation rose in AEs, while EDEs witnessed
stable to softening bias (Table VI.1).
VI.2 Going forward, global inflation is
expected to remain subdued with global
growth projected to slow down further in
2012. Softening global commodity prices are
also expected to feed into softer CPI inflation.
Simultaneous deleveraging of both the public
and private sectors in many parts of the AEs
may further weaken demand and thereby ease
inflationary risks notwithstanding sustained
easy monetary conditions. Relatively
stronger growth in EDEs could keep inflation
differentials to persist between AEs and EDEs,
even though softening of inflationary pressures
could be a general trend.
Global interest rate cycle in easing mode
VI.3 Receding risks to price stability and
increasing risks to growth have also influenced
the monetary policy stance of central banks in
major economies. As the intensified financial
market tensions were continuing to dampen economic activity in the euro area and wage
price pressures were expected to remain
moderate, the ECB reduced its key policy
rate cumulatively by 50 basis points to 1 per
cent during November-December 2011. Major
economies like Australia and Israel have also
reduced their policy rates. Many EDEs, which
were earlier increasing policy rates to address
inflation concerns have also started reducing
policy rates as growth risks became imminent.
Central banks of EDEs like Brazil, Indonesia,
Russia and Thailand have reduced policy rates
during Q3 of 2011-12 while China reduced
the required reserve ratio for deposit taking
institutions (Table VI.1).
Global commodity prices soften but oil
prices exhibit stickiness
VI.4 Global commodity prices continued to
moderate during Q3 of 2011-12 even though the
levels remain significantly high (Chart VI.1a).
Metal prices have softened significantly. The
general softening in commodities prices reflects
a combination of weakening demand, order
deferrals from purchasing managers given the
global economic outlook and appreciation of
the US dollar against major currencies. Crude
oil prices, however, have exhibited stickiness.
Brent crude prices on an average have been 30
per cent higher in 2011-12 so far, compared
with the preceding year. In spite of weakening
global growth conditions, it stayed elevated mainly due to easy liquidity and search for
returns, US proposal on sanctions on Iran,
reversal of Seaway pipeline project that lifted
the prices of WTI (West Texas Intermediate)
crude and higher demand during winter.
Table VI.1: Global Inflation Indicators |
(Per cent) |
Country/
Region |
Key Policy Rate |
Policy Rate
(as on
January 20, 2012) |
Changes in Policy Rates
(basis points) |
CPI Inflation
(y-o-y) |
Sep15,
2008 to
Aug. 23,
2009 |
Aug 23,
2009 to
Oct 24,
2011 |
Since
Oct
24,
2011 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Advanced Economies |
Australia |
Cash Rate |
4.25 (Dec. 7, 2011) |
(-) 400 |
175 |
(-) 50 |
2.8# |
3.5# |
Canada |
Overnight Rate |
1.00 (Sep. 8, 2010) |
(-) 275 |
75 |
0 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
Euro area |
Interest Rate on Main Refinancing Operations |
1.00 (Dec. 14, 2011) |
(-) 325 |
50 |
(-) 50 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
Japan |
Uncollateralised Overnight Call Rate |
0.0 to 0.10 (Oct. 5, 2010)* |
(-) 40 |
(-) 10 |
0 |
0.1^ |
-0.5^ |
UK |
Official Bank Rate |
0.50 (Mar. 5, 2009) |
(-) 450 |
0 |
0 |
3.7 |
4.2 |
US |
Federal Funds Rate |
0.0 to 0.25 (Dec.16, 2008)* |
(-) 200 |
0 |
0 |
1.5 |
3.0 |
Developing Economies |
Brazil |
Selic Rate |
10.50 (Jan. 19, 2012) |
(-) 500 |
275 |
(-)100 |
5.9 |
6.5 |
India |
Repo Rate |
8.50 (Oct. 25, 2011) |
(-) 425 |
350 |
0 |
8.3^ |
9.3^ |
|
|
|
(-400) |
100 |
|
|
|
China |
Benchmark 1-year Deposit Rate |
3.50 (Jul. 7, 2011) |
(-) 214 |
100 |
0 |
4.6 |
4.1 |
|
Benchmark 1-year Lending Rate |
6.56 (Jul. 7, 2011) |
(-) 241 |
100 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(-200) |
600 |
(-50) |
|
|
Indonesia |
BI Rate |
6.00 (Nov. 10, 2011) |
(-) 275 |
0 |
(-) 50 |
7.0 |
3.8 |
Israel |
Key Rate |
2.75 (Dec. 1, 2011) |
(-) 375 |
275 |
(-) 50 |
2.7 |
2.2 |
Korea |
Base Rate |
3.25 (Jun 10, 2011) |
(-) 325 |
125 |
0 |
3.0 |
4.2 |
Philippines |
Reverse Repo Rate |
4.50 (May. 5, 2011) |
(-) 200 |
25 |
0 |
3.0 |
4.2 |
|
Repo Rate |
6.50 (May. 5, 2011) |
(-) 200 |
25 |
0 |
|
|
Russia |
Refinancing Rate |
8.00 (Dec. 26, 2011) |
(-) 25 |
(-) 250 |
(-) 25 |
8.1^ |
6.8^ |
South Africa |
Repo Rate |
5.50 (Nov. 19, 2010) |
(-) 500 |
(-) 150 |
0 |
3.4 |
6.4 |
Thailand |
1-day Repurchase Rate |
3.25 (Nov. 30, 2011) |
(-) 250 |
225 |
(-) 25 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
* Change is worked out from the minimum point of target range. # : Q3. ^ : November.
Note : Figures in parentheses in column (3) indicate the effective dates when the policy rates were last revised. Figures in
parentheses in column (4,5 and 6) indicate the variation in the cash reserve ratio during the period. For India, data on inflation
pertain to CPI for Industrial Workers.
Source : Websites of respective central banks/statistical agencies. |
VI.5 Global food prices have also moderated
during 2011-12 so far and the FAO Food Price
Index in December 2011 was about 13 percent
below its historical peak in February 2011
(Chart VI.1b). Improved supply prospects
and comfortable stock positions indicate that
global food prices are likely to remain range
bound in the medium term. It may, however, be noted that the global food price levels
are significantly high compared to historical
levels.
VI.6 Apart from fuel, the major source of
price pressure from imported inflation in
recent years for India has been the sharp
increases in metals and other input prices
globally. During 2011-12 so far, however,
prices of metals and other raw materials have
been showing a declining trend, except in the
case of fertilizers. The salutary effect of this
moderation, however, has been largely offset
by the depreciation of the rupee.
Sticky inflation path edges down, with
dampened momentum
VI.7 Inflation in India remains high, but with
signs of moderation. Inflation, as measured by
year-on-year changes in WPI declined sharply
to 7.5 per cent (provisional) in December 2011
from 9.1 per cent in November 2011, which is
the lowest level recorded since January 2010.
Price pressures are moderating with lower pace
of increase in wholesale price index (WPI) in
recent months, lower financial year build-up of inflation and dampening month-over-month
seasonally adjusted annualised rate (3 month
moving average) of inflation (Chart VI.2).
VI.8 In terms of contribution to overall
inflation, the relative shares of food and nonfood
primary articles to overall inflation have
declined in recent months (Chart VI.3). The
fuel group continues to contribute significantly
to overall inflation, while the contribution of
manufactured non-food products marginally
increased.
Sharp decline in primary food inflation
reflects high base and seasonal
moderation, but comfort may fade fast
VI.9 During Q3 of 2011-12, primary food
articles inflation edged up to double digits in
October partly reflecting the seasonal demand
(Chart VI.4). Since then, primary food
articles prices have declined by nearly 4.6
per cent. Reflecting the impact of favourable
base effect and sharp seasonal decline in
vegetables prices, food inflation declined over
ten consecutive weeks to a 13-year low of
-3.4 per cent as on December 24, 2011 before
marginally increasing in the following two
weeks, while still remaining negative. But for
the seasonal sharp decline in vegetables prices,
food inflation would have remained sticky,
as inflation in protein-rich items continued to be in double digits (Chart VI.4b). Price
pressures in protein-rich items may continue
due to structural demand-supply imbalances.
Moreover, starting January 2012, the base
effects are expected to wane and primary
food inflation may firm up once the seasonal
moderation ends (Chart VI.5).
 |
Structural sources of pressures on food
inflation persist
VI.10 Structural sources of food price pressures
persist. Changing dietary patterns with rising
incomes that have contributed to inflation in
protein-rich items and significant upward
revisions in Minimum Support Prices (MSP)
are expected to keep up the food inflation
pressures. Significant increases in rural wages
and input costs in recent years are feeding into
the MSPs, as MSP fixation follows a cost plus
pricing approach. Despite large increases in
MSPs, in some parts of the country farmers
have reportedly preferred “crop holidays”,
fearing inability to realise remunerative prices
in an environment of significant input cost
pressures.
Inflation in non-food primary articles
dips sharply but with wide variations
across commodities
VI.11 Trends in non-food primary articles
prices provide lead information on the nature
of generalised inflation as the input cost
movements get reflected in manufactured products prices with a lag. Prices of primary
non-food articles like raw cotton and raw
rubber have declined during the year leading
to price index of this group declining by about
4.7 per cent during 2011-12 so far (as on
January 7, 2012) and inflation in this category
reached near zero levels, before edging up
recently (Chart VI.6). On the other hand,
oilseeds prices have increased during the year
so far. The Minerals group index in WPI has
increased significantly during the year so far,
partly reflecting the lagged reporting of past
increases in crude oil prices.
Fuel group inflation remains high and
partly suppressed
VI.12 Energy prices have been and are
expected to continue exerting significant
pressures on inflation. Domestic fuel group
inflation remains in double digits for successive 23 months (up to December, 2011), driven
both by upward revisions in administered
prices as well as increase in freely priced
petroleum product prices (Chart VI.7). Even
after revisions in administered prices, underrecoveries
persist. Currently, the estimated
under-recoveries by domestic oil marketing
companies for Diesel and PDS Kerosene are
`12.95 and `28.50 per litre, respectively and
`326 per cylinder for domestic LPG. As the
price of Indian crude oil basket remains firm,
rupee depreciation has led to an increase in the
cost in Rupee terms, which has resulted in the
revision of petrol (but for the marginal cuts
in November and December) and other freely
priced petroleum product prices (Table VI.2).
 |
VI.13 Despite softening global coal prices in
recent months, upward revision in coal prices have become necessary as the divergence
between domestic and international coal
prices still persist (Chart VI.8). The revision
in coal pricing formula effected in January
2012 is likely to have an inflationary impact,
the quantum of which would depend on
substitution in usage of various grades of coal.
The increase in electricity prices in September
2011 was modest relative to the increase in
input costs. Since then, the revision in coal
pricing formula, on an average, would raise
the costs for electricity generation further,
necessitating tariff revision.
 |
Table VI.2: Comparative Movement of Oil
Price and Exchange Rate Since July 2011 |
|
July
2011 |
Fortnight
(January 1-15, 2012) |
Change
in
Per cent |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Crude Oil - Indian Basket
(US$ per barrel) |
112.5 |
110.9 |
-1.4 |
Exchange Rate (Rupee/Dollar) |
44.4 |
52.5 |
18.2 |
Crude Oil - Indian Basket
(Rupee per barrel) |
4995.8 |
5827.1 |
16.6 |
Note : The composition of Indian Basket of Crude Oil represents Average of Oman & Dubai for
sour grades and Brent (Dated) for sweet grade in the ratio of
67.6:32.4.
Source: Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell. |
Inflationary pressures in core component
persist even as pricing power has been
dampened
VI.14 Over 11 consecutive months, non-food
manufactured products inflation has remained at or above 7 per cent as compared to its
long term average of about 4 per cent before
its current surge. Even though corporate
margins have come under pressure, M-o-M
(SAAR) price pressures are significant (Chart
VI.9). The depreciation of the rupee and the
associated pick-up in input cost pressures as
well as the increase in imported final products
prices have more than offset the softening
impact of weakening demand.
VI.15 The HSBC Markit Purchasing Managers
Index (PMI) for input prices and output prices,
which provide leading information on trends
in costs and prices, indicate that the pressure
on input costs have been much higher than the
pricing power for output (Chart VI.10). This
pattern suggests that for the manufactured
non-food inflation to subside significantly,
input cost pressures have to ease considerably.
Exchange rate pass-through poses risk
to inflation trajectory
VI.16 Depreciation of the rupee has accentuated
input cost pressures and poses a risk to the
inflation trajectory. It was expected that with
moderation in global commodity prices and
dampened domestic demand, inflation should
fall quickly in 2012. The pass-through of sharp
depreciation of the rupee since August 2011
has more than offset this favourable impact
and prices of metals, chemicals and textiles
have increased significantly. The pass-through
impact, however, has been partial so far due to
suppressed inflation in the fuel group as also
the lags in domestic price changes to reflect the
full impact of depreciation.
VI.17 Most of the key items under the fuel
and ‘manufactured products’ groups within
WPI also account for significant shares in
total imports (Table VI.3). Ten product groups
with a combined share of 72 per cent in total
imports, however, have a much lower weight
of 38 per cent in WPI, as a result of which the
first round pass-through of depreciation may
yield a relatively low upward pressure on WPI
headline inflation. The second round impact
through input costs and the lagged passthrough
of the first round may sustain and even
amplify the price pressures in the next few
months. Given that imported goods account
for 22 per cent of GDP, the inflationary impact
could be significant. There is some evidence
that the pass-through coefficient has increased
over time. The eventual pass-through impact
may vary over time depending on the trends
in other determinants of inflation, in particular
aggregate demand (or output gap) and
commodity prices.
Wage increases remain significant in
both rural and urban areas
VI.18 Increase in wages for unskilled
labourers in rural areas, at a rate higher than
inflation (Consumer Price Index for Rural
Laboures (CPI-RL)), has continued during
2011-12 so far (Chart VI.11). Similar pattern was witnessed across states, suggesting the
broad based nature of the wage pressures
(Chart VI.12). Similarly, in the formal sector,
analysis of company finance data suggests that staff costs have risen at a faster rate
since the middle of 2009-10 (Chart VI.13).
Rising real wages could be desirable from a
social welfare point of view as the primary
objective of development is to raise standards
of living through higher incomes. However,
wages rising faster than productivity could
be inflationary. In an environment of growth
moderating to below trend, sustained wage
pressures would complicate the monetary
policy response to inflation.
Table VI.3 : Imports and WPI – Risk of
Depreciation Induced Price Pressures |
Items |
Weight
of the
Item in
WPI (2004-05=100)
|
Share of the
Imported Item in
Total Imports |
2010-11 |
2011-12
(April- Sep) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Petroleum, crude & products |
10.26 |
28.65 |
31.43 |
Iron & steel |
8.30 |
2.63 |
2.20 |
Transport equipments |
5.21 |
3.10 |
1.81 |
Electrical machinery except electronic |
4.17 |
1.04 |
1.00 |
Machinery except electric & electronic |
3.05 |
6.45 |
6.35 |
Vegetable oils fixed (edible) |
3.04 |
1.77 |
2.06 |
Fertilizers |
2.66 |
1.87 |
1.66 |
Coal, coke & briquettes etc. |
2.09 |
2.65 |
3.68 |
Organic chemicals |
1.95 |
3.14 |
2.87 |
Artificial resins, plastic materials, etc. |
1.86 |
1.86 |
1.52 |
Manufactures of metals |
1.31 |
0.90 |
0.81 |
Inorganic chemicals |
1.19 |
0.98 |
1.11 |
Pulp and waste paper |
1.02 |
0.31 |
0.28 |
Non-ferrous metals |
1.00 |
1.10 |
1.16 |
Electronic goods |
0.96 |
7.19 |
7.22 |
Pulses |
0.72 |
0.42 |
0.35 |
Gold |
0.36 |
10.97 |
12.24 |
Note: The items presented in col. 2 and 3 & 4 may not exactly correspond, given
differences in classification of items in WPI and Imports. |
 |
 |
New CPIs show sustained increase in price
levels
VI.19 The new CPIs introduced for rural
and urban areas along with a composite All- India CPI suggest some moderation in price
pressures in December 2011 (Chart VI.14).
The price pressures have been relatively more
in rural areas as compared to the urban areas.
Among the major groups, price increases have
been more significant in textiles and fuel while
food prices have moderated in December 2011.
Fiscal stance dampens the impact
of moderation in private demand on
inflation
VI.20 Reflecting the lagged impact of antiinflationary
monetary policy actions and the
spillover from unfavourable global macrofinancial
conditions, domestic private demand
has softened, which was expected to ease the
pressure on manufactured non-food products
inflation. The expected overshooting of the
fiscal deficit from the budgeted level (as
outlined in Chapter II), and the associated
expansion in government demand, however,
would partly offset the salubrious impact
of moderating private demand on inflation.
Moreover, subsidies and the resultant higher
fiscal deficit may help in keeping inflation
suppressed in near term, but over time the
impact of higher subsidy induced deficit would
exert pressure on the inflation path. Going
forward, return to fiscal consolidation and
reorientation of public expenditure in favour of supply augmenting capital expenditure
would be necessary to ensure a more subdued
inflation path.
 |
Inflation expected to moderate gradually,
but risks of persistence remain
VI.21 The moderation in growth momentum
and subdued international commodity prices
are expected to ease the inflationary pressures
in non-food manufactured products. The
pace of moderation will, however, depend on
exchange rate changes and its pass-through to
domestic prices. If depreciation induced cost
pressures and the current order of increases
in rural wages persist in 2012, the expected
softening of inflationary pressures on account
of weakening demand conditions could be
much weaker and pose a difficult challenge
for monetary policy. Inflation is expected to
remain in line with the projected moderation
toward 7 per cent by March 2012, but supply side and external drivers of inflation could
persist into 2012-13.
VI.22 Food inflation has declined significantly.
The decline has clearly been caused by
transitory factors like seasonal decline in
vegetables prices and a high base and the
reversal may be quick. Softer commodity
prices could ease the inflationary pressures
directly, as well as indirectly through lower
pressures on the fiscal deficit and current
account deficit. But global easy liquidity
conditions and search for return on financial
investments in an atmosphere of depressed
global growth could work against any major
softening of commodity prices. While the
expected gradual softening of the inflation
could suggest the need for easing monetary
policy, medium-term inflation risks in the
absence of adequate supply side measures and
fiscal slippage warrant careful calibration. |