Global financial conditions deteriorated further during Q1 of 2012-13 as Greece and Spain
came near flashpoint, requiring further bailouts to contain the contagion. The LIBOR-fixing case
further demonstrated the fragilities in the banking and financial market space. Subdued global
growth is increasing spillover risks, even as fresh rounds of austerity measures have been put
in place to tackle the sovereign debt crisis. The financial markets in India also remained under
pressure with increased volatility in the currency and equity markets, in line with the other
emerging economies. The Reserve Bank undertook a slew of measures to boost capital flows
and also to ensure adequate liquidity in the domestic money markets.
Optimism for euro area recovery fades as
uncertainties re-emerge
V.1 Euro area difficulties increased sharply
in Q1 of 2012-13, first as political parties in
Greece failed to form a new government
necessitating re-elections, and later with the
deepening banking crisis in Spain. Prior to the
re-elections in Greece, markets viewed Greece’s
exit from the euro area as imminent. Even after
the pro-euro coalition of parties came to power
in the Greece re-elections, market uncertainty
prevails on how long Greece may stay as part
of the euro area. A heightened Spanish banking
problem has increased the risks to euro area
financial stability. The risks associated with sovereign debt indicated by spreads of credit
default swaps (CDS) has, in general, increased
over end-March 2012 levels (Chart V.1 a, b).
V.2 The subdued economic outlook and
increased risk aversion drove investors to safe
assets such as US and German sovereign bonds
leading to lower yields. On the other hand, the
G-sec yields of countries perceived as riskier
rose significantly (Chart V.1 c).
V.3 Increased funding pressures and
regulatory requirements, compounded by the
uncertainties in the euro area, have intensified
deleveraging by European banks since H2 of
2011-12. The impact of deleveraging was also
evident as international claims by European banks in BRICS countries declined in the
second half of 2011 (Chart V.1d). Going
forward, the pace of deleveraging may slow
down. However, the ongoing regulatory reforms
and proposed implementation of Basel III
recommendations in 2013 may lead to continued
tightening of lending conditions.
|
|
V.4 Since Q3 of 2011-12, the euro area
economy has either contracted or remained
stagnant. The difficulties in the euro area have
triggered an austerity versus growth debate,
reflecting the perception that austerity-focused
policies have contributed to economic hardship
while failing to eliminate the existential threat
to the euro. Despite the two Long-Term
Refinancing Operations (LTROs) conducted by
the ECB that infused more than €1 trillion into
the system, credit off-take has remained
subdued. Much of the liquidity found its way
back to the ECB’s overnight deposit facility,
while the growth in private sector lending turned
negative in May 2012 (Chart V.2).
Policy Response to Slowing Growth and
Sovereign Debt Concerns
V.5 Significant headwinds from the euro area
have compounded the global slowdown,
prompting widespread growth-enabling policy
measures towards the end of Q1 of
2012-13. Recent initiatives by the European
Council to alleviate economic and financial
pressures in the euro area include proposals to
establish a single supervisory mechanism involving the ECB, the European Stability
Mechanism (ESM) and plausible direct
recapitalisation of banks. However, a robust
long term solution is pending. This is highlighted
by the return of stress in the financial markets
following Moody’s decision to attach a negative
outlook on the Aaa sovereign rating of Germany,
Netherlands and Luxembourg and the debt
rollover difficulties being faced by Spain and
Italy. Thereafter, the Spanish yields firmed up. involving the ECB, the European Stability
Mechanism (ESM) and plausible direct
recapitalisation of banks. However, a robust
long term solution is pending. This is highlighted
by the return of stress in the financial markets
following Moody’s decision to attach a negative
outlook on the Aaa sovereign rating of Germany,
Netherlands and Luxembourg and the debt
rollover difficulties being faced by Spain and
Italy. Thereafter, the Spanish yields firmed up.
Capital inflows into emerging markets
decline as growth moderates
V.6 Subdued growth in the advanced
economies (AEs) and euro area concerns
coupled with moderation in domestic growth
conditioned the financial markets of emerging
and developing economies (EDEs), with FII
inflows turning negative for most EDEs
(Chart V.3). However, following the slew of
monetary easing measures in most AEs towards
the end of Q1 and early Q2 of 2012-13, the trend
is expected to reverse moderately. Declining
equity market trends as well as the depreciation
of EDE currencies against the US dollar
underscore the damp investor sentiments.
Indian financial markets impacted by
lower growth, decline in capital inflows
and euro area uncertainty
V.7 Lower growth, persistent inflation and
concerns over fiscal and current account deficits,
in addition to the global economic weakness
and the re-emergence of the euro area crisis, conditioned the Indian financial markets in Q1
of 2012-13. Money market rates declined during
2012-13 so far, reflecting improved liquidity
conditions in the system and the 50 bps
reduction in the repo rate announced in the
Monetary Policy Statement 2012-13. The G-sec
yields declined reflecting the lower growth
expectations, global risk aversion driven flight
to safe-haven government securities and
purchase of securities through OMO. Funding
strains kept deposit rates sticky, nevertheless,
the base rate of banks showed a slight
moderation. In line with other Asian countries,
the Indian rupee depreciated, but by a higher
magnitude on account of exacerbated concerns
on current account and fiscal deficits. Equity
markets declined led by a weak investment
climate, muted domestic growth and FII
outflows in Q1 of 2012-13.
|
Call rate eased reflecting improved liquidity
conditions
V.8 With liquidity conditions remaining
significantly tight in March 2012 on account of
quarterly advance tax outflows and rise in
currency in circulation, all segments of the
money market witnessed an increase in rates.
However, during Q1 of 2012-13, the liquidity
conditions eased with the average daily LAF
injection showing a declining trend (Table V.1).
Supported by the cut in policy rate and improved
liquidity conditions (partly due to the OMOs by
the Reserve Bank), the call rate declined
subsequently (Chart V.4).
V.9 The rates in the collateralised segments
moved in tandem with the call rate, but have
generally remained below it during 2012-13 so
far. Banks and primary dealers remain the major groups of borrowers in the collateralised
segments, while mutual funds (MFs) continue
as the major group of lenders.
Table V.1: Average Daily Volume in Domestic Financial Markets |
(` billion) |
|
Money Market |
Bond Market |
Forex Market Inter-bank (USS mn) |
Stock Market ## |
LAF |
Call Money |
Market Repo |
CBLO |
Commercial Paper* |
Certificates of Deposit* |
G-Sec** |
Corporate Bond # |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Mar-12 |
-1574.3 |
175.1 |
111.8 |
379.8 |
911.9 |
4195.3 |
98.6 |
26.1 |
20.6 |
151.9 |
Apr-12 |
-1028.6 |
249.5 |
143.2 |
376.8 |
1310.0 |
4447.5 |
141.1 |
20.0 |
23.1 |
120.1 |
May-12 |
-985.5 |
184.5 |
151.3 |
339.1 |
1498.0 |
4394.1 |
151.8 |
17.5 |
20.9 |
117.3 |
Jun-12 |
-913.0 |
151.8 |
180.4 |
375.9 |
1258.1 |
4251.7 |
257.6 |
29.5 |
18.4 |
117.1 |
Jul-12(P) |
-476.5^ |
149.9^ |
172.1^ |
411.6^ |
- |
- |
- |
28.8@ |
- |
112.8@ |
*: Outstanding position. **: Average daily outright trading volume in central government dated securities.
#: Average daily trading in corporate bonds. ##: Average daily turnover in BSE and NSE. P: Provisional
^: Average daily data up to July 26, 2012. @: Up to July 24, 2012.
Note: In col. 2, (-) ve sign indicates injection of liquidity while (+) ve sign indicates absorption of liquidity. |
|
V.10 CD rates spiked during March 2012,
reflecting overall tight liquidity conditions in
the money markets and the reluctance of MFs
to rollover bank CDs after asset management
companies were made accountable for fair
valuations on a mark-to-market basis. CP rates
firmed up similarly. However, since then the
weighted average effective interest rates
(WAEIR) on CDs and the weighted average
discount rate (WADR) of commercial paper
(CP) declined, following improved liquidity
conditions.
G-sec yields declined, reflecting the
domestic economic situation, declining
crude oil prices
V.11 Driven by expectations of a rate cut in
the Annual Policy of the Reserve Bank, and also
by concerns of weakening industrial and export
growth, G-sec yields softened at the beginning
of Q1 of 2012-13. However, S&P’s revision of
India’s long term rating outlook to negative led
yields to temporarily firm up towards the end
of April 2012. The declining trend in crude oil
prices, general risk aversion and purchase of
securities through OMO caused the yields to
ease thereafter (Chart V.5).
V.12 Yields continued to soften during the first
half of June 2012 following the disappointing growth figure for Q4 of 2011-12 at 5.30 per cent.
On the whole, in Q2 of 2012-13 so far, the yields
exhibited a softening bias. According to SEBI
data, FIIs made investments in debt worth `51.5
billion in 2012-13 so far (up to July 23, 2012).
MFs also bought debt worth `1,535.5 billion
during the same period.
|
V.13 The markets remain cautious about the
reduction in fiscal deficit. Gross market
borrowings of the government through dated
securities during 2012-13 were `2.3 trillion (net
borrowings `1.6 trillion) up to July 23, 2012
compared with `1.6 trillion (net borrowings
`1.1 trillion) during the corresponding period
of the previous year (Table V.2). During 2012-
13 (up to July 23, 2012), 20 states raised `420
billion on a gross basis (net `370 billion)
compared with `370 billion on a gross basis (net
`303 billion) raised by 14 states during the corresponding period of 2011-12. The weighted
average yield firmed up to 9.0 per cent up to
July 23, 2012 from 8.6 per cent for the same
period in the previous year.
Table V.2: Issuances of Central and State Government Dated Securities |
Item |
2011-12 |
2012-13* |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Central government |
|
|
Gross amount raised (` billion) |
5,100.0 |
2,340.0 |
Devolvement on primary dealers (` billion) |
121.1 |
12.0 |
Bid-cover ratio (range) |
1.4-5.1 |
1.5-3.6 |
Weighted average maturity (years) |
12.7 |
13.6 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
8.5 |
8.5 |
State government |
|
|
Gross amount raised (` billion) |
1,586.3 |
419.8 |
Cut-off yield range (per cent) |
8.4-9.5 |
8.7-9.3 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
8.8 |
9.0 |
*Up to July 23, 2012. |
Table V.3: Deposit and Lending Rates of Banks |
(Per cent) |
Items |
Mar-11 |
Jun-11 |
Sep-11 |
Dec-11 |
Mar-12 |
Jun-12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. Domestic Deposit Rate (1 - 3 year tenor) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Public Sector Banks |
8.00-9.75 |
8.25-9.75 |
8.55-9.75 |
8.55-9.75 |
9.00-9.75 |
8.75-9.50 |
ii) Private Sector Banks |
7.75-10.10 |
8.00-10.50 |
8.00-10.50 |
8.00-10.50 |
8.00-10.50 |
8.00-10.00 |
iii) Foreign Banks |
3.50-9.10 |
3.50-10.00 |
3.50-9.75 |
3.50-9.75 |
3.50-9.75 |
3.50-9.75 |
Modal Deposit Rate (all tenors) |
6.65 |
7.08 |
7.44 |
7.46 |
7.42 |
7.40 |
2. Base Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Public Sector Banks |
8.25-9.50 |
9.25-10.00 |
10.00-10.75 |
10.00-10.75 |
10.00-10.75 |
10.00-10.50 |
ii) Private Sector Banks |
8.25-10.00 |
8.50-10.50 |
9.70-11.00 |
10.00-11.25 |
10.00-11.25 |
9.75-11.25 |
iii) Foreign Banks |
6.25-9.50 |
6.25-9.50 |
6.25-10.75 |
6.25-10.75 |
7.38-11.85 |
7.38-11.85 |
Modal Base Rate |
9.50 |
10.00 |
10.75 |
10.75 |
10.75 |
10.50 |
3. Median Lending Rate* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Public Sector Banks |
8.88-14.00 |
9.50-14.50 |
10.50-15.25 |
10.25-15.25 |
10.60-15.35 |
- |
ii) Private Sector Banks |
9.00-14.50 |
9.25-15.00 |
9.00-15.25 |
10.00-15.50 |
10.50-15.50 |
- |
iii) Foreign Banks |
7.70-14.05 |
7.70-14.50 |
9.13-14.75 |
9.50-14.38 |
10.00-14.50 |
- |
* : Median range of interest rate at which at least 60 per cent business has been contracted. - : Not available. |
Deposit rates of banks stay sticky, reflecting
higher costs and inflation
V.14 The modal deposit rates for scheduled
commercial banks (SCBs) declined marginally
by 2 bps to 7.40 per cent across all maturities
during Q1 of 2012-13, while the modal base
rate of SCBs declined by 25 bps to 10.50 per
cent (Table V.3). Banks’ response on deposit
rates remain rather muted so far, reflecting the
interplay of factors such as tight liquidity
conditions in Q1 of 2012-13 and high inflation.
Rupee depreciated sharply amid concerns
of widening current account and fiscal
deficit and global uncertainty
V.15 In Q4 of 2011-12, the Indian rupee
reversed its falling streak exhibited during most
of the year and recorded some gains. Owing to
the interplay of a mix of domestic and global
factors (see para III.6 page 19), the rupee started
weakening from April 2012. Subsequently
however, the rupee gained due to improved FII
flows coupled with the lower trade deficit partly
aided by policy initiatives. The distinct phases and primary drivers of the rupee movement over
the course of the year have been mapped in
Chart V.6.
V.16 The depreciation of the exchange rate in
Q1 of 2012-13 is not specific to India; most EDE
currencies have also depreciated. However, the
depreciation of Indian rupee is large reflecting
growing current account deficit unlike other
major Asian economies who have current
account surpluses (Table V.4).
Equity markets turned cautious on
concerns about the investment climate
V.17 The slow recovery in Q4 of 2011-12
reversed for most part of Q1 of 2012-13, on the backdrop of deceleration in IIP growth, weak
revenue outlook for major Indian IT companies
and concerns over the implementation of
retrospective tax and general anti-avoidance
rules (GAAR). Euro area crisis, the downgrade
of India’s long term rating outlook to negative
from stable and the rupee slide also affected the
market sentiment. However, the later part of
June 2012 saw the market turnaround from low
levels on account of a pick-up in FII investment
in the equity market, clarifications by the
government on retrospective tax, GAAR and
the government decision to boost investments
in infrastructure, and, on the global front, the
European Council’s decision to support stressed euro area sovereigns and banks. SEBI data
indicate that FIIs sold shares worth `9.8 billion
in Q1 of 2012-13, while MFs sold shares worth
`6.4 billion during the same period (Chart V.7).
V.18 In Q2 of 2012-13 so far (up to July 23,
2012), the equity market recovered aided by FII
investments (`78.7 billion), moderation in the
depreciation of the rupee and the easy monetary
policy pursued globally.
Table V.4: Movements in Select EDE Currencies against the US Dollar |
Appreciation (+)/Depreciation (-) in per cent (y-o-y) |
Currency |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
Apr-Jul 26, 2012 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Current Account Deficit Countries |
1. Brazil |
9.7 |
-10.8 |
-10.1 |
2. India |
1.1 |
-12.7 |
-8.6 |
3. Mexico |
4.3 |
-7.0 |
-4.6 |
4. South Africa |
8.0 |
-11.5 |
-7.5 |
5. Turkey |
-4.8 |
-10.5 |
-1.7 |
Current Account Surplus Countries |
1. Argentina* |
-4.3 |
-7.5 |
-4.2 |
2. China |
4.1 |
4.2 |
-0.7 |
3. Indonesia |
4.7 |
-5.1 |
-3.3 |
4. Malaysia |
8.2 |
-1.4 |
-3.2 |
5. Russia |
3.4 |
-2.8 |
-10.1 |
6. South Korea |
2.2 |
-2.7 |
-1.1 |
7. Thailand |
6.7 |
-1.8 |
-2.6 |
*: Current account balance turned into deficit from 2011. |
The primary market remained subdued
V.19 The low risk appetite of investors coupled
with a weak secondary market and negative
returns on IPOs led to low resource mobilisation in the primary segment in 2011-12. During
2012-13 so far (up to end-June 2012), the
primary market continued to remain muted, with
only `5 billion mobilised through six public
issues (four IPO and two rights issues)
(Table V.5).
Table V.5: Resource Mobilisation from Capital Market |
(` billion) |
Category |
2011-12 |
2011-12 (Apr-Jun) |
2012-13 (Apr-Jun) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
A. Prospectus and Rights Issues* |
129 |
70 |
5 |
1. Private Sector (a+b) |
83 |
24 |
5 |
a) Financial |
9 |
17 |
0 |
b) Non-financial |
74 |
7 |
5 |
2. Public Sector |
46 |
46 |
0 |
B. Euro Issues |
27 |
12 |
2 |
C. Mutual Fund Mobilisation (net)@ |
-220 |
730 |
-4,995 |
1. Private Sector |
-154 |
644 |
-3,985 |
2. Public Sector # |
-66 |
86 |
-1,010 |
* Excluding offer for sale. @: Net of redemptions. #: Including UTI MF.
Source: Mutual Fund data are sourced from SEBI and exclude funds mobilised under Fund of Funds Schemes. |
|
Table V.6: House Price and Transactions Volume Indices (Base Q4:2008-09 = 100) |
Quarter |
Mumbai |
Delhi |
Bengaluru |
Ahmedabad |
Lucknow |
Kolkata |
Chennai* |
Jaipur |
Kanpur |
All India |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
House Price Index |
Q4: 2010-11 |
172.3 |
135.2 |
113.6 |
128.7 |
140.3 |
171.9 |
106.8 |
155.3 |
135.7 |
141.7 |
Ql:2011-12 |
191.6 |
152.8 |
116.9 |
152.3 |
149.3 |
157.0 |
106.3 |
161.1 |
135.4 |
152.0 |
Q2:2011-12 |
206.1 |
153.0 |
116.0 |
162.8 |
159.2 |
159.0 |
113.9 |
165.1 |
138.3 |
157.8 |
Q3:2011-12 |
191.7 |
168.6 |
146.1 |
171.8 |
172.3 |
155.0 |
120.3 |
163.5 |
140.0 |
164.1 |
Q4:2011-12 |
224.7 |
195.3 |
140.6 |
177.2 |
169.7 |
158.4 |
117.0 |
164.4 |
148.7 |
176.9 |
Growth in per cent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y-o-Y |
30.4 |
44.4 |
23.7 |
37.7 |
21.0 |
-7.9 |
9.5 |
5.9 |
9.5 |
24.8 |
Q-o-Q |
17.2 |
15.8 |
-3.8 |
3.1 |
-1.5 |
2.2 |
-2.7 |
0.5 |
6.2 |
7.8 |
House Transactions Volume Index |
Q4: 2010-11 |
111.9 |
151.5 |
102.2 |
153.8 |
108.4 |
91.1 |
81.6 |
218.7 |
156.2 |
126.3 |
Ql:2011-12 |
89.5 |
149.4 |
100.8 |
134.3 |
93.9 |
107.9 |
80.3 |
243.1 |
208.4 |
123.2 |
Q2:2011-12 |
79.0 |
165.5 |
123.5 |
154.1 |
106.7 |
139.2 |
85.5 |
239.1 |
131.1 |
129.1 |
Q3:2011-12 |
75.9 |
195.9 |
84.6 |
131.2 |
165.1 |
108.9 |
130.9 |
222.0 |
120.6 |
128.9 |
Q4:2011-12 |
108.6 |
149.8 |
70.8 |
122.2 |
153.0 |
128.5 |
99.0 |
247.5 |
172.1 |
126.5 |
Growth in per cent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y-o-Y |
-2.9 |
-1.1 |
-30.7 |
-20.5 |
41.1 |
41.1 |
21.3 |
13.2 |
10.2 |
0.2 |
Q-o-Q |
43.1 |
-23.5 |
-16.3 |
-6.9 |
-7.3 |
18.0 |
-24.4 |
11.5 |
42.7 |
-1.9 |
Note: * Chennai index is based on both residential and commercial properties.
All India index is a weighted average of city indices, weights based on population proportion. |
Housing prices increased in most cities
despite lower volumes
V.20 According to the Reserve Bank’s quarterly
House Price Index (HPI) during Q4 of 2011-12
housing prices in all cities, except Kolkata,
showed an increase on a y-o-y basis. Compared
to the previous quarter, housing prices show a
moderation for Bengaluru, Lucknow and
Chennai (Table V.6). The number of housing
transactions on an annual basis shows mixed
trends, with the average all-India Index remaining
almost unchanged. While Mumbai, Delhi,
Ahmedabad and Bengaluru report a decline in
transaction volumes on an annual basis, the
quarterly decline in five out of nine cities has led
to a decline in the all-India transaction volume
index growth. Despite transaction volumes
moderating in the later part of 2011-12, housing
prices seem to have firmed up.
Stressed financial conditions likely to persist
V.21 Financial conditions are likely to remain
uncertain in the near-term with the stress likely
to persist for some time, given both global and
domestic conditions. The recent LIBOR fixing
controversy has also added to the uncertainty
by drawing attention to how a few large global
financial institutions allegedly manipulated one
of the most commonly used market rates. The
episode has also reduced market confidence in
key benchmark rates. Cases of inattention to
money laundering have also dented market
confidence. These events add to the already
existing pressures arising from euro area
fragilities.
V.22 On the domestic front, falling corporate
earnings at a time when corporate positions are
already leveraged, could keep equity markets
under pressure. As such, there is a need to
improve the investment climate to drive the
economy out of its slowdown and improve
market sentiments. While currency pressures
have currently abated, uncertainty remains
ahead with global risk aversion being high and
the external sector weakening. |