Notwithstanding a sharp rise in the government’s final consumption expenditure, aggregate
demand in the economy remained weak during Q1 of 2013-14 because of deceleration in
private consumption and contraction in fixed investments. Persisting consumer price inflation
impacted private consumption expenditure, while structural impediments and general uncertainty
regarding the policy environment weighed down on investment activities. There was a sharp fall
in fresh investment proposals from the private corporate sector during the quarter, reflecting
the prevalence of overall negative business sentiments. However, a good monsoon this year and
the pick-up in exports could boost aggregate demand.
Private consumption weakened, fixed
investment contracted in Q1 of 2013-14
II.1 Expenditure-side GDP continued to
weaken during Q1 of 2013-14 mainly on account of a deceleration in private final
consumption expenditure and a contraction in
fixed investments, even as the government’s
final consumption expenditure showed a sharp
increase (Table II.1).
Table II.1: Aggregate demand continues to weaken mainly on account of deceleration in private consumption and contraction in fixed investment |
Expenditure Side GDP (2004-05 prices) |
(Per cent) |
Item |
2011-12* |
2012-13# |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
Growth Rates (y-o-y) |
GDP at Market Prices |
6.3 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
2.5 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
Total Final Expenditure |
8.1 |
3.9 |
4.7 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
(i) Private |
8.0 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
4.2 |
3.8 |
1.6 |
(ii) Government |
8.6 |
3.9 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
2.2 |
0.6 |
10.5 |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
4.4 |
1.7 |
-2.2 |
1.1 |
4.5 |
3.4 |
-1.2 |
Change in Stocks |
-30.6 |
73.4 |
69.8 |
71.7 |
75.8 |
76.0 |
-0.4 |
Valuables |
6.6 |
-12.0 |
-20.9 |
4.3 |
-6.9 |
-20.2 |
92.5 |
Net Exports |
-42.5 |
-17.3 |
-6.7 |
-21.4 |
-23.7 |
-16.4 |
-6.0 |
Discrepancies |
-100.3 |
152.0 |
-12.9 |
28.6 |
-128.5 |
-6.3 |
29.1 |
|
Relative Shares |
Total Final Expenditure |
70.5 |
71.0 |
72.1 |
72.8 |
73.5 |
65.9 |
72.5 |
(i) Private |
59.2 |
59.6 |
61.1 |
61.8 |
61.4 |
54.7 |
60.6 |
(ii) Government |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
12.1 |
11.2 |
11.9 |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
33.7 |
33.2 |
33.8 |
34.6 |
32.0 |
32.6 |
32.6 |
Change in Stocks |
2.3 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
Valuables |
2.4 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
4.0 |
Net Exports |
-8.8 |
-10.0 |
-9.6 |
-11.0 |
-11.3 |
-8.4 |
-9.9 |
Discrepancies |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-2.4 |
-2.6 |
0.1 |
4.2 |
-3.0 |
Memo: |
GDP at market prices
(` Billion) |
56314 |
58137 |
13702 |
13536 |
15062 |
15836 |
14034 |
*: First Revised Estimates;
#: Provisional Estimates.
Source: Central Statistics Office. |
II.2 Slowdown in income growth and
persistence of a high consumer price inflation
impacted private consumption expenditure
while structural impediments and general
uncertainty regarding the policy environment
weighed down on investment activities.
Investment in valuables, however, increased
sharply on the back of high inflation and
expected relative returns. In fact, among all the
components of aggregate demand, the
contribution of valuables to overall growth was
the highest during Q1 of 2013-14 (Table II.2).
At the same time, while exports continued to
contract for the third successive quarter, imports
also slackened in line with overall domestic
activity and consequently, net exports posted a
smaller contraction in Q1 of 2013-14 vis-a-vis
previous quarters.
Table II.2: Valuables and government
consumption
supported overall growth |
Contribution-weighted growth rates of
expenditure-side
GDP (2004-05 Prices)* |
(Per cent) |
Item |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1. Private Final Consumption Expenditure |
2.6 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
2. Government Final Consumption Expenditure |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
1.2 |
3. Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
-0.8 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
-0.4 |
4. Change in Stocks |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
5. Valuables |
-0.6 |
0.1 |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
2.0 |
6. Net Exports |
-0.6 |
-2.0 |
-2.3 |
-1.2 |
-0.6 |
(i) Exports |
3.0 |
1.2 |
-0.9 |
-0.2 |
-0.3 |
(ii) Less Imports |
3.6 |
3.2 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
7. Sum 1 to 6 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
8. Discrepancies |
0.4 |
-0.6 |
0.6 |
-0.3 |
-0.7 |
9. GDP at Market Prices (7+8) |
3.4 |
2.5 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
*: Contribution-weighted growth rate of a component of
expenditure-side GDP is obtained as follows: (Y-o-y change in the component ÷ Y-o-y change in GDP at constant market prices) × Y-o-y growth rate of GDP at constant market prices.
Source: Central Statistics Office. |
Persistent efforts to address infrastructure
bottlenecks will help turnaround investment
demand, boost market confidence
II.3 Persistent policy logjams, particularly
those associated with delayed clearances on the
part of the government; aggressive bidding on
the part of private developers during the high
growth phase; and inadequate appraisal
mechanisms on the part of financiers, brought
the infrastructure sector to a standstill.
Consequently project delays have been slowing
India’s growth in a big way. As of June 2013,
about 50 per cent of central sector projects (of
`1.5 billion and above) were delayed, up from
44 per cent in June 2008, for which the cost
overruns rose from 12 to 20 per cent during the
last five-year period. Delayed projects were high
in sectors, such as roads, followed by power,
petroleum and railway.
II.4 Furthermore, leverage of the firms
operating in infrastructure sector for a sample
of 50 BSE 500 companies has risen over the
years. Total borrowing to equity has increased
from 111.3 per cent in 2009-10 to 217.2 per cent
in 2012-13. Raising fresh equity in this sector
has been difficult of late.
II.5 However, efforts at addressing the
problems have begun to unlock the potential in
this area. The Cabinet Committee on Investments
(CII) was constituted to expedite the clearance
of projects; CCI has cleared about 209 projects
till mid-September 2013. A Project Monitoring
Group was also set up in the Prime Minister’s
Office which has finalised deadlines for the
intermediate steps to be taken to accelerate key
mega infrastructure projects. While the impact
is not immediately seen, concerted efforts over
the next six months could bring about a
turnaround in investment demand.
II.6 Amongst the infrastructure industry, the
power sector was crippled by the poor
performance of thermal power, with the plant
load factor (PLF) declining continuously to
almost early 2000 levels (Chart II.1). Estimates
suggest that loss of power generation due to
shortage of coal and gas amounted to around 50
billion units (BU) in 2012-13 and about 11.4 BU during the first four months of 2013-14.
Though directives to sign fuel supply agreements
(FSAs) have been given, the issue of demand-supply
imbalance for coal is yet to be resolved.

II.7 Activity in the roads sector was also at
a low ebb, as projects awaited forest,
environmental and land acquisition clearances.
During April-June 2013, National Highways
Authority of India (NHAI) constructed/widened
and strengthened 568 km of National Highways,
recording a negative growth of around 7 per
cent over the same period previous year. The
government and the Reserve Bank have taken
several steps to remove constraints facing the
sector including delinking environment from
forest clearances, treatment of lenders’ debt
exposure as secured loans, substitution policy
for concessionaires and significant stepping up
of efforts on NHAI’s part to fast-track land
acquisition. Over the last few months, the
government has also been engaging with
financial institutions and other stakeholders to
infuse greater funds in highway projects.
However, with large number of tendered
projects remaining uninitiated, cancellation of
bids and re-biding need to be speedily
undertaken. Besides, pushing engineering,
procurement and construction (EPC) projects
can partially offset the low interest in tendering
for public-private partnership (PPP) based road
projects. The PPP mode is expected to pick up again in the next 1-2 years once the measures
adopted by the government fructify and as
investors’ risk appetite improves.
II.8 In the telecommunications sector,
balance sheets of major private service providers
have been under pressure for quite some time,
with operating margins having shrunk. In order
to revive the sector, the government took some
measures including announcing the National
Telecom Policy 2012 and increasing the FDI
cap in the sector from 74 to 100 per cent. While
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)
made various recommendations, spectrum
pricing remains a vexed issue.
Corporate investment intentions continued
to moderate
II.9 Corporate investment intentions
remained subdued. The envisaged cost of
projects for which institutional assistance was
sanctioned during Q1 of 2013-14 aggregated
`220 billion, which was significantly lower than
the quarterly average for the previous two years
(Table II.3). A sharp fall in fresh investment proposals in metal and metal products and
power industries mainly contributed to this
decline. An industry-wise analysis indicates that
during Q1 of 2013-14, the share of envisaged
expenditure on new projects was the highest in
the power industry followed by the textile
industry (Chart II.2).
Table II.3: Institutionally assisted project investment
witness decline |
Institutionally assisted projects and their
envisaged
expenditure (Quarter-wise)* |
(` billion) |
Financial Year |
No. of
Projects |
Total
Envisaged
Expenditure |
of which |
Power
industries |
Metal
& metal
products industries |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2011-12 |
Q1 |
147 |
749 |
284 |
231 |
|
Q2 |
184 |
452 |
218 |
23 |
|
Q3 |
137 |
462 |
242 |
14 |
|
Q4 |
168 |
253 |
69 |
46 |
2012-13 |
Q1 |
110 |
413 |
240 |
36 |
|
Q2 |
132 |
666 |
207 |
145 |
|
Q3 |
89 |
256 |
157 |
15 |
|
Q4 |
94 |
629 |
187 |
352 |
2013-14 |
Q1 |
82 |
220 |
72 |
32 |
*: Data are provisional and may undergo change due to
modification/
cancellation of projects if reported subsequently.
Note: Based on data reported by 39 banks/FIs usually active in
project finance. |
Sales growth decelerated, while net profits
declined
II.10 Sales growth (y-o-y) of non-government
non-financial listed companies continued to
decelerate and reached a low of 2.5 per cent in
Q1 of 2013-14 (Table II.4). The decline in sales
was more distinct in the case of motor vehicles,
medical precision and other scientific
equipments, electrical machinery and apparatus,
cement and cement products, iron and steel and
real estate. The deceleration was most prominent
for the manufacturing sector followed by the
non-IT services sector. Sequentially, sales fell
by 6.5 per cent in Q1 of 2013-14. While
operating profits registered marginal growth,
contraction in net profits was recorded for the
second successive quarter. Further, profitability
in terms of the EBITDA margin improved
marginally in Q1 as compared to the previous
quarter. The net profit margin, however,
recorded a marginal decline.
II.11 Early results of 194 listed nongovernment
non-financial companies for Q2 of
2013-14 show y-o-y sales growth and operating
profits have improved.
Table: II.4: Corporate sales decelerate
faster in Q1 of 2013-14 |
Performance of non-government
non-financial companies |
(Per cent) |
|
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
No. of Companies |
2,446 |
|
Growth Rates (y-o-y) |
Sales |
14.3 |
12.0 |
9.6 |
4.3 |
2.5 |
Value of Production |
13.7 |
12.6 |
8.4 |
4.3 |
1.9 |
Expenditure, of which |
16.7 |
12.8 |
8.5 |
5.1 |
2.0 |
Raw Materials |
14.0 |
14.9 |
9.5 |
2.9 |
-3.0 |
Staff Cost |
17.8 |
15.4 |
13.4 |
13.6 |
13.9 |
Power & Fuel |
25.9 |
21.3 |
11.1 |
3.6 |
1.1 |
Operating Profits (EBITDA) |
-3.3 |
11.3 |
7.8 |
-0.9 |
1.2 |
Other Income* |
27.6 |
49.6 |
0.3 |
2.0 |
28.7 |
Depreciation |
10.4 |
10.1 |
10.4 |
8.8 |
9.5 |
Gross Profits (EBIT) |
-2.4 |
18.9 |
5.5 |
-2.9 |
4.1 |
Interest |
38.8 |
11.4 |
17.3 |
11.6 |
12.2 |
Tax Provision |
-3.7 |
11.1 |
4.9 |
-3.9 |
0.7 |
Net Profits (PAT) |
-13.0 |
22.0 |
21.3 |
-16.2 |
-10.4 |
|
Ratios in per cent |
Change in stock to Sales # |
0.9 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
Interest Burden |
32.3 |
26.9 |
32.8 |
30.4 |
34.8 |
EBITDA to Sales |
12.9 |
13.3 |
12.7 |
12.7 |
12.8 |
EBIT to Sales |
11.6 |
12.9 |
11.3 |
11.8 |
11.9 |
Net Profit to Sales |
6.1 |
7.1 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
5.3 |
#: For companies reporting this item explicitly.
*: Other income excludes extraordinary income/expenditure if
reported explicitly
Note: Growth rates are percentage changes in the level for the
period under reference over the corresponding period of the
previous year for common set of companies. |
The central government’s key deficit
indicators widened; risks for fiscal slippage
in 2013-14
II.12 The deficit indicators of the central
government widened significantly during the
first five months of 2013-14. Low growth of the
centre’s net tax revenue on the one hand and a
significant increase in revenue expenditure on
the other increased the revenue deficit of the
central government, which has already reached
87.4 per cent of budget estimates. The widening
of revenue deficit coupled with higher capital
expenditure resulted in a gross fiscal deficit of
74.6 per cent of budget estimates during the
5-month period. This is the highest in the last
five years.
Growth slowdown weighs on tax collections
II.13 During the current fiscal so far, gross
tax revenue (as a per cent of budget estimates)
has been lower than the previous year due to
moderation under the major tax heads. Based
on latest data for April-September 2013, gross
direct tax revenue was higher by 10.7 per cent
(5.9 per cent a year ago), with an improvement
in both corporation as well personal income tax
collections. However, net of refunds, growth in
direct tax collections decelerated considerably
during the same period to 10.7 per cent as
compared to 16.3 per cent last year and 19.5 per
cent budgeted for 2013-14.
II.14 On the indirect taxes front, excise duty
collections recorded a decline during April-
August 2013, reflecting the impact of continued
industrial slowdown (Chart II.3). The growth
in services tax also witnessed deceleration in
tandem with a moderation of India’s services
sector growth. However, collections from
custom duties were higher than the previous
year, reflecting the impact of rupee depreciation.
II.15 There are also risks to budgetary targets
arising from the slow pace of disinvestment this
year. Proceeds from disinvestment programmes
for 2013-14 were meagre at `14.3 billion as
against `400 billion targeted in the budget. On
the non-tax revenue side, the Reserve Bank’s
record surplus transfer of `330 billion in August
2013 has already contributed to nearly one-fifth
of the budgeted non-tax revenue of the central government. There is scope to offset the
possible shortfall in disinvestment proceeds
through payment of higher dividends by cash-rich
public sector units (PSUs). Some of this
cash can also be utilised by public sector units
to boost public investments in their areas of
operations depending on capacity creation needs
and expected rate of returns.
Restraining expenditure is necessary for
fiscal consolidation
II.16 The government’s total expenditure
during April-August 2013 as percentage of
budget estimates was higher both in the revenue
and capital accounts. Though, on the non-plan
front, expenditure has been lower (Chart II.4),
the spending on major subsidies during the
period accounted for 62.3 per cent of budget
estimates. Although the government has taken
several steps to contain expenditure on subsidies
through various reform measures, including
phased deregulation of diesel prices and
restrictions on subsidised LPG cylinders, the
sharp depreciation of the rupee and increase in
international prices of petroleum products
increased the under-recoveries of the oil
marketing companies (OMCs). OMCs reported
under-recoveries of `256 billion in Q1 of 2013-
14 and are currently incurring a daily under-recovery
of `4.42 billion per day. There is a
need to raise diesel prices further given an
under-recovery of `10.24 per litre (effective
October 16, 2013); on current reckoning, given
the spillover from the previous year’s under recovery compensation, fuel subsidies could
significantly overshoot budgetary provisions.

II.17 On the food subsidy front, although the
recently enacted National Food Security (NFS)
Act, 2013 may not lead to a breach in the
budgetary provision of `100 billion for NFS,
the overall food subsidy provision of `900
billion for the current year may not be adequate
to meet the requirements of the existing targeted
public distribution system. In subsequent years,
implementation of the NFS Act could lead to
increase the food subsidies depending on how
it is rolled out and how other food-related
schemes are merged with it.
State finances are budgeted to improve in
2013-14, although fiscal concerns remain
II.18 The consolidated fiscal position of state
governments for 2013-14, based on their budget
estimates, shows a continuance in fiscal
consolidation, with an increase in revenue
surplus and a reduction in the GFD-GDP ratio
(Table II.5). Revenue surplus will be generated
primarily through a reduction in the revenue
expenditure-GDP ratio by 0.2 percentage points.
On the expenditure side, although the capital
outlay-GDP ratio is budgeted to marginally
increase in 2013-14, the development
expenditure-GDP ratio is budgeted to decline
by 0.3 percentage points over the previous year,
raising concerns about the quality of expenditure.
Demand management requires balancing
fiscal consolidation with investment
support
II.19 Containing the fiscal deficit in 2013-14
within the budgetary limit could be a challenge
for the government, given the level of gross
fiscal deficit during the current fiscal so far. The
government has started putting some correctives,
such as austerity measures including a mandatory
10 per cent cut in non-Plan expenditures
excluding certain identified expenditures. The
government has also been making efforts to improve tax compliance through a combination
of administrative steps as well as incentives,
such as the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance
Encouragement Scheme. More such measures
are needed to avert fiscal slippage. Fiscal
multipliers for capital outlay are found to be
significantly higher than that for revenue
expenditure. Hence, fiscal consolidation with a
re-orientation in expenditure from revenue
expenditure to investment spending could be
growth supportive as it will also crowd in
private investment.
Table II.5: Gross Fiscal Deficit Budgeted to Improve in 2013-14 |
Key Deficit Indicators |
(As per cent to GDP) |
Year |
Primary Deficit |
Revenue Deficit |
Gross Fiscal deficit |
Outstanding Liabilities |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Centre |
2011-12 |
2.7 |
4.4 |
5.7 |
51.9 |
2012-13
(Provisional
Accounts) |
1.8 |
3.6 |
4.9 |
51.9* |
2013-14 BE |
1.5 |
3.3 |
4.8 |
51.1 |
States |
2011-12 |
0.4 |
-0.3 |
1.9 |
22.2 |
2012-13 RE |
0.8 |
-0.2 |
2.3 |
21.7 |
2013-14 BE |
0.6 |
-0.4 |
2.2 |
21.4 |
Combined |
2011-12 |
3.2 |
4.1 |
7.6 |
65.4 |
2012-13 RE |
2.9 |
3.7 |
7.5 |
65.5 |
2013-14 BE |
2.2 |
2.9 |
6.9 |
65.8 |
* Revised Estimates
Note: 1. Minus (-) sign indicates surplus.
2. Outstanding liabilities of Centre and combined
government includes external liabilities of the Centre
calculated at current exchange rate as on March 31,
2013.
3. Combined liabilities of 2013-14 are adjusted for
States’ investment in Centre’s treasury bills as on
October 24, 2013.
Source: Budget documents of the Central and State
governments. |
|