I. Macroeconomic Outlook
Economic activity gained pace in Q1 of 2014-15, but its momentum appears to have slackened in Q2. With the
improvement in business confidence and congenial conditions for restarting investment demand, real GDP growth
should pick up towards the close of the year, aided by a modestly firming global recovery supporting exports and the
ongoing search for yields in international financial markets spurring capital inflows. Barring the impact of weather-related
food supply disruptions, inflation has been moderating in a broad-based manner and is set to evolve around
the expected trajectory through 2014-15. Elevated inflation expectations of households and risks from still-high
input costs and sticky wages, however, present challenges to bringing down inflation to 6 per cent by January 2016
along the committed glide path.
I.1 Outlook for Inflation
With consumer price index (CPI) inflation easing from
its recent peak of 11.2 per cent in November 2013,
the near-term outlook for inflation has improved and
the target of 8 per cent for January 2015 appears more
within reach than at the time of the first bi-monthly
monetary policy statement in April. Latest readings on
sensitive components of food prices suggest that they
may have peaked after monsoon related increases. The
softening of international commodity prices, particularly
crude oil, metals and chemicals, is feeding through into
an abating of key input prices domestically. Wages,
though still sticky, are decelerating, facilitating smaller
increases in minimum support prices than in the past.
Also, the stability in the exchange rate since January
this year is entrenching the disinflation. Furthermore,
the effects of past monetary policy tightening are
operating through the slack in various segments of the
economy to bring down inflation excluding food and
fuel. Nevertheless, there are upside risks to inflation
from the skewed spatial and temporal distribution of
the monsoon and from geo-political tensions which
could jeopardise the near- term outlook if they
materialise.
Expectations of various economic agents tracked by
forward-looking surveys provide useful insights into
wage and price formation and thereby into the evolution
of inflation conditions. Households’ three month ahead
inflation expectations appear to have discounted
recent favourable developments on the inflation front and have been rising since March, presumably affected
by monsoon uncertainty (Chart I.1). Households’
inflation expectations for a year ahead also moved up
after edging down since December 2013, and remain
elevated relative to their long-run averages. Professional
forecasters surveyed by the Reserve Bank also believe
that median inflation may ease up to Q3 of 2014-15,
but it is likely to firm up in Q4 (Chart I.2). Their long-term
inflation expectations, however, appear to be on
a gradually declining path. The industrial outlook
survey of the Reserve Bank reflects a softening of
manufacturers’ expectations of input prices over the
near-term; with slack in the economy persisting, this could lead to selling prices moderating going forward
(Chart I.3).
Taking into account the baseline assumptions
(Table I.1), near-term forecasts drawn from structural
models, with off-model judgmental adjustments
reflecting information that is not explicitly modeled,
suggest that average CPI headline inflation will be about
8 per cent in Q4 of 2014-15, with a 70 per cent confidence interval of 6.8 per cent to 9.2 per cent. Thus,
the risks to the target of ensuring CPI inflation at or
below 8 per cent by January 2015 remain broadly
balanced (Chart I.4). The near-term month-wise
evolution of the inflation trajectory suggests that
inflation will ease from the current level of close to 8
per cent to about 6 per cent by November. With
favourable base effects reversing in the following
months (Box I.1), inflation is likely to climb back to
around 8 per cent by January through March 2015.
Model projections over a longer monetary policy
horizon, i.e., up to March 2016, assuming unchanged macroeconomic policies and structural characteristics
of the Indian economy, suggest that inflation will
gradually ease to 7.0 per cent in Q4 of 2015-16 with a
70 per cent confidence interval of 4.6 per cent to 9.4
per cent. This indicates that the upside risks to the
target of 6 per cent by January 2016 are significant,
especially with economic activity and aggregate demand
expected to pick up and structural improvements in
food supply taking time to fructify.
Table I.1: Baseline Assumptions for Near-Term Projections |
• Indian basket crude oil price at US$ 100 per barrel for the remaining part of the year. |
• Exchange rate at about `60 per US$ for the remaining part of the year. |
• No increase in diesel prices from September 2014 onwards. |
• No increase in administered LPG and kerosene prices in the remaining part of the year. |
• Global growth picking up in the second half of the year, as projected in the World Economic Outlook (WEO) July 2014 update, IMF. |
• Achievement of fiscal deficit targets as outlined in the Union Budget for 2014-15. |
• No major change in domestic macroeconomic/structural policies during the forecast horizon. |
I.2 Outlook for Growth
Real GDP growth surprised on the upside in Q1 of
2014-15, recording 5.7 per cent after remaining damped
for eight consecutive quarters. On the supply side, the
12 per cent deficit in rainfall in the south west monsoon
season as well as its uneven distribution and delayed kharif sowing relative to a year ago will drag down
agricultural growth, which is evident from the first
advance estimates of kharif production. The sharp
pick-up in industrial activity in Q1 has weakened
thereafter, with decline in production of both consumer
durables and capital goods. However, business
sentiment is on an upswing as reflected in financial
market conditions. Standard and Poor’s have revised
India’s sovereign rating outlook from negative to stable,
which should contribute to brightening the prospects
for investment and capital flows. Constituents of the
ser vices sector are moving at different speeds.
Construction activity should benefit from policy
initiatives to boost affordable housing, investment in
real estate, and refinancing of infrastructure projects
coming back on-stream. Ahead of this recovery, bank
credit to construction has been accelerating and should
gain further momentum as efforts to improve credit
disbursement support the revival of demand. On the other hand, financial and business services as well as
social, community and personal services are unlikely
to sustain the pace of expansion recorded in Q1 in
view of sluggish banking activity and the expected fiscal
consolidation.
Box I.1: Base Effects and Inflation Forecasting
Short-term y-o-y inflation forecasts are fundamentally
influenced by the base effect and, therefore, a good
understanding of how and why inflation behaved in
the base period is key to robust forecasts. Formally,
the base effect has been defined as the contribution to
changes in the annual rate of inflation from unusual or extreme changes in the price index (or sub-index)
during the base period i.e., the period that is used as
the basis for calculation of annual rates2. Forecasting
y-o-y inflation thus involves two parts: (a) a good fix on
base effects which is obtained from the momentum of
inflation in the base period that is already known; and
(b) projecting future momentum through time series
techniques and structural models and converting them
into price index values so that they can be expressed
in y-o-y terms.
The inflation outcome characterising the year
2013-14 as well as 2014-15 so far is a good example of
the interaction between momentum and base effects
as reflected in the observed volatility of headline
inflation. In June 2014, the sharp increases in prices
of vegetables resulted in high momentum of headline
price increases, but y-o-y inflation moved down
because of a favourable base effect from even higher
momentum in June 2013. By contrast, vegetable prices
spiked further in July 2014 relative to the preceding
month, pushing up momentum of headline inflation
and more than offsetting the favourable base effect.
Consequently, y-o-y headline inflation rose sharply in July 2014 in comparison with June 2014. In August
2014, with base effects overwhelming the headline
price momentum, which had seen some moderation
due to decline in the extent of month over month
(m-o-m) increase in vegetable prices, year on year (y-o-y)
inflation registered a decline from July to August 2014
(Chart I.B1).
Going forward, favourable base effects are expected
to dampen headline inflation over September-
November 2014, aided by a moderation in momentum
as vegetable prices come off their recent peak. The
evolution of headline inflation during December 2014
-February 2015 will likely be significantly influenced by
unfavourable base effects arising out of the sharp fall in
m-o-m changes in prices during the base period. This, in
spite of a possible subdued momentum obtained from
a seasonal softening of vegetable prices, would result in
an upturn in inflation during December 2014-February
2015. Monetary policy in disinflationary mode along with normal monsoons next year could then mute the
momentum of headline inflation. The favourable base
effects from high inflation in June-August 2014 could
operate in conjunction to produce an easing inflation
trajectory in the middle of 2015-16.
Turning to the demand side, gross fixed capital
formation should build upon the robust upturn in
Q1 as announced policy measures to boost investment
take effect. External demand is gradually
improving, suggesting better prospects for export
growth in the second half of 2014-15. Although
corporate sales seem to be pointing to modest
strengthening of consumption, rural demand is being
moderated by slowing growth in agriculture.
Forward-looking indicators extracted from surveys
of real activity conducted by the Reserve Bank as well
as other agencies reflect cautious optimism on the
near-term outlook for growth. While professional forecasters expect only a gradual pick-up in growth
after some deceleration in the second half of 2014
(Chart I.5), business expectations of corporates
surveyed by the Reserve Bank are at an eleven-quarter
high in Q3 of 2014-15 (Chart I.6). This is also
corroborated by surveys conducted by other agencies,
which ascribed upbeat business sentiment to formation
of a stable government at the centre and the greater certainty about the policy environment, improvement
in twin deficits, buoyant foreign capital inflows, a
stable exchange rate and improved financial market
conditions (Table I.2). Consumer confidence is also
reviving, with the Reserve Bank’s survey indicating
expectations one year ahead at their highest levels
since the global financial crisis (Chart I.7).
Table I.2: Business Expectations Surveys |
|
NCAER
Business
Confidence
Index Q1:
2014-15 |
FICCI
Overall
Business
Confidence
Index Q4:
2013-2014 |
Dun and Bradstreet
Business
Optimism
Index Q3:
2014 |
CII Business
Confidence
Index Q1:
2014-15 |
Current level of the index |
143.5 |
69.0 |
145.5 |
53.7 |
Index as per
previous
survey |
127.0 |
60.8 |
154.5 |
49.9 |
Index levels one year back |
117.7 |
57.4 |
130.6 |
51.2 |
% change (q-o-q) |
13.0 |
13.5 |
-5.8 |
7.6 |
% change (y-o-y) |
21.9 |
20.2 |
11.4 |
4.9 |
Model-based forecasts augmented with these
forward-looking assessments indicate that the sharp
pick-up in growth in Q1 of 2014-15 may not be
sustained in Q2 and Q3 as the full impact of the monsoon deficiency plays out on agricultural activity,
with spillovers to non-agricultural sectors through
demand effects (Chart I.8). The outlook for services,
and in particular, community, social and personal
services is weak. For other categories of services a slow
turnaround is expected in the second half of 2014-
15. Accordingly, prospects for reinvigoration of nonagricultural
growth are expected to improve only
gradually, gathering momentum in Q4 of 2014-15.
Looking forward into 2015-16, the likely firming up of
export growth and investment demand should support
both manufacturing and service sector activity. Revival
of stalled projects and the space created for private
enterprise by ongoing fiscal consolidation should
support a stronger step-up in the growth momentum
in an environment of steady disinflation.
For 2014-15, real GDP growth is projected to lie
between 5 per cent and 6 per cent, with a central
estimate of 5.5 per cent. This projection remains
unchanged from the April projection with a better than
expected industrial growth compensating for the likely
decline in agricultural growth. GDP growth for Q4 of
2014-15 is projected at 5.6 per cent with a 50 per cent
confidence interval of 5.1 per cent to 6.1 per cent. For 2015-16, real GDP growth is projected to rise to 6.3
per cent.
I.3 Balance of Risks
The macroeconomic outlook is subject to risks from
both global and domestic uncertainties. Risks from
global adversities such as a slowdown in the pace of
global recovery, financial market turbulence due to
faster than expected tightening of monetary policy
in advanced economies and hardening of commodity
prices on geo-political tensions and/or weather-related
supply disruptions could impact all emerging economies.
On the other hand, domestic risks stem from a larger
than expected negative impact of a skewed distribution
of monsoon, inflationary impact of a stronger than
expected improvement in domestic economic activity
and exacerbation of exchange market pressures. The
likely impact of these shocks on growth and inflation
are assessed using a quarterly projection and policy
analysis system.
(a) Uncertainty Surrounding Global Recovery
If global growth turns out to be weaker than projected
in the July update of the IMF’s World Economic Outlook,
due to either a lasting impairment of potential output,
or financial vulnerabilities resurfacing and undermining consumer confidence, or the effects of monetary policy
tightening, or a combination thereof, external demand
conditions facing India’s exports could worsen,
translating into a negative external shock for growth.
A widening of slack in the global economy by 50 basis
points would lead to a decline in India’s GDP growth
from the baseline by about 20 basis points in 2015-16
(Chart I.9). Domestic inflation would also soften by
about 10 basis points below the baseline, largely
reflecting the fall in global commodity prices in
response to higher slack in the global economy and
their pass-through to domestic inflation (Chart I.10).
(b) Reversal in Commodity Prices
In the baseline, international crude prices are expected
to gradually moderate through 2015 with alternate
supply sources opening up amidst weak demand. Yet,
a supply disruption induced imported inflation shock
in the form of a 10 per cent increase in the price of the
Indian basket of crude oil from the level assumed in
the baseline could result in an increase in headline
inflation by about 20 basis points above the baseline.
The direct impact on domestic retail fuel prices will be
reinforced by the second round impact on food,
manufacturing and services prices. The crude oil price increase would have a minimal impact on GDP growth
reflecting still low energy intensity of growth.
(c) Below Normal Monsoon in 2015-16
As regards specific domestic shocks, the baseline
trajectories of growth and inflation assume a normal
monsoon in 2015-16 and moderate increases in
minimum support prices. If these conditions are not
realised, the shock to farm output, and through demand
and input linkages to other sectors, could result in a
decline in overall GDP growth by around 40 basis points
below the baseline in 2015-16. This may lead to food
price pressures persisting at the levels prevailing so far,
pushing headline inflation by about 80 basis points
above the baseline by the end of 2015-16.
(d) Augmenting Supply Capacity
A favourable shock to the baseline inflation path could
also be envisaged if the recent initiatives to address
food supply bottlenecks fructify on an enduring basis,
especially through improvements in the supply chain,
reforms in market infrastructure and a step-up in
investment in agriculture. This may result in GDP
growth accelerating by about 40 basis points in 2015-16
over the baseline, and a faster fall in food price
inflation leading to a decline in headline inflation by
around 90 basis points below the baseline by the end
of 2015-16.
(e) Faster Closing of Output Gap
The future path of inflation could also be impacted by the
uncertainties surrounding the outlook for growth. If
real GDP growth turns out to be stronger by 100 basis
points than expected in 2015-16, aggregate demand
could rise sharply in the form of a pick-up in
investment and consumer spending. This would result
in a faster closing of the output gap, translating into
higher underlying inflation and an increase in
headline inflation by about 20 basis points above the
baseline by the end of 2015-16. This relatively muted
effect of a positive demand shock essentially reflects
the initial conditions – the persisting slack in the
economy.
(f) Depreciation of the Rupee
Another risk to the baseline inflation path is volatility
in the exchange rate emanating either from global
developments or a domestic demand shock. If the
exchange rate depreciates by 10 per cent in 2015-16
below the baseline assumption, a rise in import
costs would feed into higher input costs and over time,
translate into higher output prices as firms pass on cost
pressures. The direct and indirect impact of the
exchange rate change would cause headline inflation
to increase by about 30 basis points above the baseline. The deprecation of rupee may, however,
provide some boost to exports, resulting in an increase
in GDP growth by about 10 basis points
The macroeconomic outlook presented in this chapter
is one of gradual disinflation with growth gaining some
momentum from Q4 of 2014-15 and improvement in
macro-balances (Table I.3). Near-term risks appear to
be abating, but medium-term risks are still on the
upside. The outlook draws upon the assessment of
macroeconomic conditions presented in Chapter II to
Chapter V.
Table I.3: Reserve Bank’s Baseline and Professional Forecasters’ Median Projections |
|
2013-14 |
2014-15P |
2015-16P |
Inflation (All India CPI-C, y-o-y, in per cent)[ Last quarter of the year] |
8.4 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
GDP Growth (in per cent) |
4.7 |
5.5 |
6.3 |
Fiscal Deficit (per cent of GDP) |
4.5 |
4.1 |
3.6 @ |
Assessment of Survey of Professional Forecasters’^ |
Key Macroeconomic Indicators |
2013-14 |
2014-15 |
2015-16 |
Inflation (All India CPI-C, y-o-y, in per cent)* |
8.4 |
7.9 |
7.0 |
Real GDP at factor cost (growth rate in per cent) |
4.7 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
Agriculture & Allied Activities (growth rate in per cent) |
4.7 |
1.9 |
3.5 |
Industry (growth rate in per cent) |
-0.1 |
3.9 |
5.0 |
Services (growth rate in per cent) |
6.2 |
7.0 |
7.6 |
Private Final Consumption Expenditure at current market price (growth rate in per cent) |
12.4 |
12.1 |
12.9 |
Gross Domestic Saving (per cent of GDP) |
30.4 |
30.7 |
32.0 |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation (per cent of GDP) |
28.3 |
29.4 |
30.4 |
Money Supply (M3) (growth rate in per cent) |
13.2 |
14.0 |
14.9 |
Bank Credit of schedule commercial banks (growth rate in per cent) |
13.9 |
14.8 |
16.0 |
Combined Gross Fiscal Deficit (per cent of GDP) |
6.9 |
6.6 |
6.1 |
Central Government Gross Fiscal Deficit (per cent of GDP) |
4.6 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
Overall Balance of Payments (in US $ bn.) |
15.5 |
33.1 |
31.2 |
Merchandise Exports (growth rate in per cent) |
3.9 |
7.8 |
10.0 |
Merchandise Imports (growth rate in per cent) |
-7.2 |
7.1 |
10.8 |
Merchandise Trade Balance (per cent of GDP) |
-7.9 |
-7.6 |
-7.3 |
Current Account Balance (in US $ bn.) |
-32.4 |
-40.0 |
-50.0 |
Current Account Balance (per cent of GDP) |
-1.7 |
-2.0 |
-2.2 |
Capital Account Balance (in US $ bn.) |
48.8 |
71.6 |
80.0 |
Capital Account Balance (per cent of GDP) |
2.6 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
P: Projected.
^: Forecast based on the Survey of Professional Forecasters, 27th Round.
* : Estimated from the end-year probability distribution of forecasts for 2014-15 and 2015-16.
@: As per the Government of India’s Medium-term Fiscal Policy Statement. |
II. Prices and Costs
The ebb of headline consumer price inflation through 2014-15 so far was interrupted by a spike in vegetable prices
in July 2014 due to monsoon-induced supply disruptions. Excluding food and fuel, however, inflation has been
declining, aided by the disinflationary stance of monetary policy. Headline inflation appears well aligned with the
target of 8 per cent set for January 2015. As for costs, there are indications of some deceleration after a sustained
period of high growth.
In January 2014, the Reserve Bank formally adopted
a glide path for disinflation in terms of headline
consumer prices1, with milestones of 8 per cent
by January 2015 and 6 per cent by January 2016.
Drawing from the recommendations of the Expert
Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary
Policy Framework (Chairman: Dr. Urjit R. Patel), this
ushered in a fundamental regime shift in the conduct
of monetary policy in India. The Reserve Bank
anchored this change by tightening monetary policy
in the January 2014 policy review and maintained this
tight stance in subsequent policy reviews so as to set
the economy firmly on the disinflation path. Since
then, inflationary pressures have fallen in a broadbased
manner. This has been aided by measures taken
by the Government to control the fiscal deficit and
to augment food supply, disincentivise agricultural
exports and reform agricultural marketing policies.
II.1. Consumer Prices
Inflation is ultimately determined by the stance
of monetary policy, notwithstanding short-run
disturbances emanating from sectoral price pressures.
Reflecting the ongoing transmission of monetary
policy impulses through the economy, inflation
excluding food and fuel has declined from 8.5 per cent
in September 2013 to 6.9 per cent in August 2014. Food
inflation has also moderated in tandem from double
digits to 9.2 per cent in August 2014, punctuated by
sharp inclement weather-driven spikes. Fuel inflation
has been steadily falling as administered increases
in kerosene, cooking gas and coal prices have been
held back while electricity price revisions have been low and infrequent. Accordingly, headline inflation
has fallen from 11.2 per cent in November 2013 to 7.8
per cent in August 2014 – within range of the target of
8 per cent for January 2015 (Chart II.1).
Even as headline year-on-year inflation has been
moderating, there was a sharp pick-up in month-on-month change in prices – or momentum – in
July caused by sharp increases in food prices.
The momentum, however, moderated in August
(Chart II.2). The impact of higher momentum on the
headline has been largely masked by favourable base
effects. The magnitude of sequential increases in
prices in CPI excluding food and fuel were also higher
in June and July 2014, though it reversed in August.
A marked feature of the years following the global
financial crisis of 2008-09 has been the persistence
of CPI inflation in India. While there has been a downward correction in average headline inflation in
the recent period beginning in January 2014 relative
to 2012 and 2013, its inertia at elevated levels relative
to tolerance thresholds warrants careful scrutiny
of the sources of this persistence so as to break
unidirectional expectations surrounding the inflation
outlook (Chart II.3. and Box II.1).
II.2. Drivers of Inflation
Recent changes in headline inflation are observed to be
sensitive to the behaviour of some of its components, which appear to be moving in diverse directions and
exerting differing pulls (Chart II.4).
Analysis of the cross-sectional distribution of
inflation assumes importance in this context to
ascertain whether or not transitory elements are
generating relative price changes which could be
impacting aggregate price movements enduringly.
In particular, India’s inflation history shows that
supply shocks tend to produce a positive skew to its
distribution, with a few items pushing the average
inflation up on a sustained basis. Headline CPI inflation has largely had a positive skew, indicating
that relative price pressures may be contributing to
the overall inflation persistence (Chart II.5).
Box II.1: Post-crisis Inflation Persistence in India
Inflation persistence is the tendency for shocks to push
the inflation rate away from its steady state. Sources
of inflation persistence have been identified as: (a)
intrinsic persistence or backward-lookingness in pricesetting
behaviour; (b) extrinsic persistence arising
out of the mark-up over costs; (c) expectations-based
persistence emerging from the nature of inflation
expectations; and (d) policy-driven persistence from
monetary policy regime shifts. For a country like India
which is exposed to a variety of shocks, this disaggregate
approach assumes critical importance.
Recent studies in the Indian context suggest that: (i)
inflation persistence increased in the post-global crisis
period; (ii) both intrinsic and extrinsic persistence
declined while expectations-driven inflation persistence
increased; (iii) both intrinsic and extrinsic inflation
persistence have, however, remained high relative to
the cross-country experience; and (iv) the increase in
expectations-driven inflation persistence could be due
to consumers’ incomplete information on the nature of
economic shocks and also unhinged credibility around
the ability of macroeconomic policies to deliver low
and stable inflation.
Food constitutes about 48 per cent of the CPI and has
been the major source of upside pressures on retail
inflation. Food price shocks have large and persistent
effects on inflation expectations, with second-round effects propagating into prices of items other than
food and resulting in a generalisation of inflation.
Within the food group, cereals constitute about
15 per cent of the CPI but the sub-group’s contribution
to food inflation has declined over the preceding 12
months (Chart II.6). The group of protein-based items
(eggs, fish, meat, milk and pulses), which has been
experiencing persistent upside pressures, contributed
about a sixth of overall inflation through 2014-15 so
far. Fruits and vegetables have a share of merely 7
per cent in the index, but contributed about a fifth of
headline inflation in July and August, and are marked
by sharp spikes in prices.
Headline inflation is also vulnerable to shocks from
fuel prices, typically emanating from administered
price changes in response to international crude price
movements. The category fuel and lighting accounts
for 9.5 per cent of the CPI. Contribution to headline
inflation from this category has been falling on
account of inadequate administered price revisions.
However, the large element of suppressed inflation
in subsidised kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas
(LPG) warrants a precautionary monetary policy stance
in the context of under-recoveries of oil marketing
companies (OMCs) which may push up outgoes on
subsidies (Table II.1).
Table II.1: Under-recovery of Oil Marketing Companies |
Product |
2013-14
(` bn) |
Q1 of 2014-15
(` bn) |
Under-recovery
(` per litre)* |
Diesel |
628 |
90 (105) |
-0.35 |
PDS Kerosene |
306 |
75 ( 65) |
32.67 |
Domestic LPG |
465 |
121 (85) |
427.82 |
Total |
1,399 |
287 (256) |
|
* Effective September 16, 2014.
Note: Figures in parentheses refer to the corresponding period of the
previous year , i.e., Q1 of 2013-14.
Source: Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell. |
CPI inflation excluding food and fuel has been
falling gradually since September 2013 in response to
monetary policy actions, with favourable implications
for the evolution of headline inflation. Within this
category, housing2, contributing 11 per cent to
headline inflation through 2014-15 so far, has been
edging down with rentals easing in recent months.
Inflation in respect of transport and communication
– which mainly comprises petrol and transport fares
– has experienced moderation since October 2013,
largely reflecting the easing of international crude
prices, stability in the exchange rate and favourable base effects (Chart II.7). The category of ‘others’ in
the CPI covers a heterogeneous group of personal
non-tradable services with annual price changes
persistently in double digits barring June 2014. This
suggests that wages have been imparting upside
price pressures to these labour-intensive services
and on an economy- wide basis, they can lead to the
generalisation of inflationary pressures.
Other indicators of retail inflation such as consumer
price indices for industrial workers (CPI-IW),
agricultural labourers (CPI-AL) and rural labourers
(CPI-RL) ebbed in Q1 of 2014-15 and moderated further
in July-August 2014. Wholesale inflation measured by
the wholesale price index (WPI) as also the indicator
of economy-wide price trends – the GDP deflator –
have decelerated (Table II.2).
II.3. Costs
Cost pressures from both domestic and external
sources have played a significant role in the coexistence
of elevated inflation and a negative
output gap, denting the efficacy of monetary policy in
bringing inflation down to the desired extent. Supply
bottlenecks in various sectors of the economy have
imparted cost-push rigidities to the level and path of
inflation.
Imported inflation, mainly associated with the prices
of crude petroleum, in 2014-15 so far, have eased.
Combined with a stable exchange rate, market-determined
prices of petroleum, oil and lubricants
(POL) could moderate. Furthermore, the staggered
increases in the administered prices of diesel coupled with softening of international crude oil prices have
wiped out the diesel under-recovery of OMCs in
September 2014.
Table II.2: Measures of Inflation |
(Y-o-Y per cent growth of quarterly/quarterly average/monthly data) |
Quarter/
Month |
GDP
deflator |
WPI |
CPI |
CPI-IW |
CPI-AL |
CPI-RL |
Q1: 2013-14 |
5.7 |
4.8 |
9.5 |
10.7 |
12.6 |
12.4 |
Q2: 2013-14 |
7.2 |
6.6 |
9.7 |
10.8 |
12.9 |
12.7 |
Q3: 2013-14 |
7.8 |
7.1 |
10.4 |
10.6 |
12.4 |
12.3 |
Q4: 2013-14 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
8.2 |
6.9 |
8.5 |
8.7 |
Q1: 2014-15 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
8.1 |
6.9 |
8.1 |
8.3 |
Jul-14 |
N.A. |
5.2 |
8.0 |
7.2 |
8.0 |
8.1 |
Aug-14 |
N.A. |
3.7 |
7.8 |
N.A. |
7.2 |
7.6 |
Costs of farm inputs have seen some deceleration in
the last one year (Chart II.8). Industrial raw material
cost pressures have been easing. The Reserve Bank’s
industrial outlook survey indicates that fewer firms
assessed that input prices went up in Q2 of 2014-
15 than in the corresponding quarter a year ago. At
the same time, fewer firms expect increase in selling
prices, reflecting perceptions of still weak pricing
power (Table II.3).
Table II.3: Assessment for Input/Output Cost |
(Percentage responses) |
Quarter |
Total Response
(Number) |
Cost of Raw
Material (Net
Response) |
Selling Price (Net Response) |
Q1:2013-14 |
1,321 |
-49.9 |
7.3 |
Q2:2013-14 |
1,207 |
-62.2 |
11.3 |
Q3:2013-14 |
1,223 |
-55.3 |
7.8 |
Q4:2013-14 |
1,114 |
-54.1 |
9.6 |
Q1:2014-15 |
1,293 |
-49.5 |
9.8 |
Q2:2014-15 |
1,225 |
-44.7 |
6.8 |
Source: Industrial Outlook Survey, RBI. |
Services sector input cost pressures are perceived
by purchasing managers to be moderating from their
recent peak in 2011. Weak pricing power is, however,
preventing the pass-through of even these moderate
increases into selling prices (Chart II.9).
Trends in labour costs have to be assessed separately
for both formal and informal sectors, given the
dualistic character of the Indian labour market
(Box II.2). Monetary policy has to be watchful about
wage-price spirals posing risks to the disinflationary
momentum.
Inflationary pressures are expected to ease further in
Q3 as the effects of weather-related food price shocks
wane and the usual seasonal trough sets in. Cost
pressures from both domestic and external sources
are softening. The path of headline inflation in the
coming months will be impacted by favourable base
effects. As they dissipate from December onwards,
headline inflation could turn up in the last quarter of
2014-15. Potential administered price revisions carry
upside risks to the near-term inflation outlook. It is
critical that these dynamics are carefully monitored to
ensure that the disinflation momentum is sustained.
Box II.2: Measurement of Wages/Labour Costs
Wages are a key determinant of the inflation process
influencing cost conditions and also setting up –
through rigidities in their formation – the short-run
trade-off that monetary policy has to address. Unlike
most advanced and many emerging market economies,
the heterogeneity of labour markets and large presence
of self-employed as well as the unorganised sector
makes it difficult to collate and compile labour market
and wage statistics on a regular basis. In order to assess
wage pressures, therefore, the Reserve Bank uses a
wide range of information.
(i) In the organised sector, growth in per unit
employee costs1 extracted from balance sheets of
companies engaged in manufacturing and services
have remained moderate in recent quarters (Chart
II.B.1).
(ii) Unit labour costs (ULCs), arrived at as a ratio of
staff cost to value of production, have risen in the
recent period for both manufacturing and services
sector entities (Chart II.B.2).
(iii) Rural wages gauge wage pressures in the unorganised
sector. Notwithstanding definitional changes, starting
November 2013, which render temporal comparison
difficult, modest softening in monthly rural wage
growth appears to be underway (Chart II.B.3).
(iv) Information on item level indices for services in
the CPI (IW) can proxy for wages as they predominantly
reflect wages paid to labourers. A combined index
incorporating seven such services2 indicates that the
cost of these services increased in recent months (Chart
II.B.4).
III. Demand and Output
Domestic activity recorded a distinct upturn during Q1 of 2014-15. Improvement in business confidence has driven
up investment demand after a two year hiatus, but consumption spending remains subdued. Industrial activity
slumped in July after having picked up in Q1 supported by a steady rise in exports. Skewed and deficient monsoon
is likely to dampen growth in the agriculture sector while the prospects for services are still mixed.
The Indian economy expanded at a faster than
expected pace in Q1 of 2014-15 after eight successive
quarters of sluggish growth. This has infused business
sentiment with guarded optimism on the near-term
outlook. Exports of goods and services in real terms
have recorded double-digit growth for four successive
quarters in spite of headwinds from a weak global
economy and domestic supply constraints. Nevertheless,
risks to agriculture from the skewed spatial distribution
of the south-west monsoon and the still sluggish
prospects for service sector activity will challenge
efforts to sustain the momentum of activity over Q2
and Q3 of 2014-15.
III.1 Aggregate Demand
Real GDP at market prices grew at 5.8 per cent in Q1
of 2014-15 - higher than 4.2 per cent a year ago - buoyed
by net exports and a turnaround in gross fixed capital
formation (Table III.1).
In spite of election-related expenditure in April and
May, the erosion of purchasing power by inflation and
moderating real wage growth took its toll and the contribution of private final consumption expenditure
(PFCE) to GDP growth declined over Q4 of 2013-14.
Gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) grew robustly at
7.0 per cent, though partly lifted by the base effect of
decline of 2.8 per cent in Q1 of 2013-14. Subsequently,
however, the contraction in capital goods production
in July 2014 and sluggish imports of capital goods have
raised concerns about sustainability of the investment
recovery. Accordingly, the growth in new investment
intentions of the private corporate sector has been
modest (Chart III.1).
Sustained progress in putting stalled projects back to
work is key to a durable reinvigoration of animal spirits
in investment activity. This could also crowd-in new
investment and provide a much needed stimulus to
aggregate demand. So far, however, surmounting this
gridlock has proved formidable as a number of factors
are driving the time overruns in project implementation,
including land acquisition, forest clearance and supply
of raw material. Yet another binding constraint is the
energy sector outlook with uncertainty regarding coal
supply.
Table III.1: Real GDP Growth by Expenditure |
(Per cent) |
Item |
2013-14 (PE) |
2013-14 |
2014-15 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
I. Private Final Consumption |
4.8 |
5.6 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
8.2 |
5.6 |
II. Govt Final Consumption |
3.8 |
12.9 |
-0.1 |
3.6 |
-0.4 |
8.8 |
III. Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
-0.1 |
-2.8 |
3.1 |
0.2 |
-0.9 |
7.0 |
IV. Net Exports |
-32.1 |
-15.0 |
36.7 |
52.9 |
47.5 |
30.2 |
Exports |
8.4 |
-2.8 |
15.0 |
11.3 |
10.5 |
11.5 |
Imports |
-2.5 |
1.7 |
0.4 |
-8.3 |
-3.7 |
-0.4 |
V. GDP at Market Prices |
5.0 |
4.2 |
5.2 |
4.4 |
6.1 |
5.8 |
PE: Provisional Estimates. |
Government final consumption expenditure (GFCE)
decelerated sharply in Q1 of 2014-15 than a year ago.
In terms of proportion to budget estimates (BE), the
key deficit indicators of the central government, viz.,
the revenue deficit (RD) and the gross fiscal deficit (GFD)
were marginally lower during 2014-15 (up to July) than
a year ago, mainly on account of lower plan revenue
expenditure and capital expenditure on defence.
Table III.2: Key Fiscal Indicators – Central Government Finances |
Indicators |
Actual as per cent of Budget Estimates (April - July) |
2014-15 |
2013-14 |
I. Revenue Receipts |
14.8 |
16.7 |
a. Tax Revenue (Net) |
15.0 |
16.4 |
b. Non-Tax Revenue |
13.5 |
18.0 |
2. Total Receipts |
14.2 |
16.1 |
3. Non-Plan Expenditure |
30.5 |
33.5 |
(a) On Revenue Account |
30.3 |
33.4 |
(b) On Capital Account |
32.1 |
33.8 |
4. Plan Expenditure |
23.0 |
27.0 |
(a) On Revenue Account |
22.9 |
27.4 |
(b) On Capital Account |
23.1 |
25.1 |
5. Total Expenditure |
28.1 |
31.3 |
6. Fiscal Deficit |
61.2 |
62.8 |
7. Revenue Deficit |
70.4 |
73.0 |
8. Primary Deficit |
198.1 |
148.0 |
Expenditure on subsidies was significantly lower at 33
per cent of BE from 51 per cent a year ago. Tax revenue
dipped to 15 per cent of BE than 16.4 per cent a year
ago on lower collections under custom duties and union
excise duties. Non-tax revenues were also lower, mainly
on account of interest and dividend receipts
(Table III.2). Going forward, introduction of goods and
services tax (GST) will provide a boost to the
manufacturing sector.
Net exports rose by 30.2 per cent in Q1 of 2014-15,
providing valuable contribution to aggregate demand
in spite of a subdued global recovery. Underpinning
this improvement, export growth picked up to 11.5 per
cent in Q1 of 2014-15, benefiting from the competitive
edge stemming from rupee depreciation in 2013-14.
Reflecting the fall in merchandise trade deficit, a small
rise in net exports of services, higher net investment
income outgo related to servicing of equity and debt
obligations and a marginal fall in net private transfers,
the current account deficit (CAD) shrank to 1.7 per
cent of GDP in Q1 of 2014-15, down from 4.8 per cent
a year ago (Charts III.2 and III.3). Net of POL imports,
the current account balance remains in surplus since
Q4 of 2012-13.
The financial account of India’s balance of payments
in Q1 of 2014-15 was dominated by direct and portfolio
investments. External commercial borrowings (ECBs)
and trade credit also recorded net inflows (Chart III.4).
India’s external sustainability indicators recorded a
modest improvement, contributed by a build-up of
foreign exchange reserves. The net international
investment position (NIIP) remained stable at 17.6 per
cent of GDP in March 2014 which is sustainable from
the point of view of the debt servicing profile and a
viable level of the CAD.
Assessment of reserve adequacy should take into
account not only reserves as measured conventionally
but also off-balance sheet buffers in the form of net
outstanding forward purchases of the Reserve Bank,
which stood at US $ 5.4 billion as at end-July 2014, and
bilateral/multilateral swap lines, such as the Reserve
Bank of India and Bank of Japan Currency Swap
Arrangement of US $ 50 billion and the Brazil, Russia,
India, China and South Africa (BRICS) Contingent
Reserve Arrangement (CRA), 2014. Under the CRA,
each country’s maximum access limit is equal to a
multiple of its own commitment to the total pool of
US $ 100 billion.
III.2 Output
Real GDP at factor cost rose by 5.7 per cent in Q1 of
2014-15, shrugging off eight successive quarters of
sluggish momentum with industrial growth, in
particular, returning to positive territory after two
quarters (Chart III.5 and Table III.3).
The prospects for agriculture in 2014-15 will likely be
impacted by the vicissitudes of the south-west monsoon. Setting in late, it gathered momentum
rapidly from July and rainfall deficiency measured by
the rainfall index of the India Meteorological
Department (IMD) progressively narrowed from 43 per
cent at the end of June to 12 per cent by late September.
The Reserve Bank’s production-weighted rainfall
index (PRN)1 indicates a larger rainfall deficit. The
spatial and temporal distribution of rainfall has been
skewed (Chart III.6). The kharif foodgrain production is likely to decline by 6.9 per cent in 2014-15, while
production of other crops including oilseeds and
commercial crops is also likely to suffer. On the other
hand, reservoir levels have risen to 79 per cent and
therefore, the rabi foodgrains output, which accounts
for 50.7 per cent of total production on average, could
largely alleviate kharif shortfalls.
Table III.3: Real GDP Growth - Supply Side |
(Per cent) |
Sector |
2013-14 |
2013-14 |
2014-15 |
Share |
Growth |
Q 1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q 4 |
Q 1 |
I. Agriculture, forestry & fishing |
13.9 |
4.7 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
3.7 |
6.3 |
3.8 |
II. Industry |
18.7 |
-0.1 |
-0.9 |
1.8 |
-0.9 |
-0.5 |
4.0 |
(i) Mining & quarrying |
1.9 |
-1.4 |
-3.9 |
0.0 |
-1.2 |
-0.5 |
2.1 |
(ii) Manufacturing |
14.9 |
-0.7 |
-1.2 |
1.3 |
-1.5 |
-1.4 |
3.5 |
(iii) Electricity, gas & water supply |
1.9 |
5.9 |
3.8 |
7.8 |
5.0 |
7.2 |
10.2 |
III. Services |
67.4 |
6.2 |
6.5 |
6.1 |
6.4 |
5.8 |
6.6 |
(i) Construction |
7.4 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
4.4 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
4.8 |
(ii) Trade, hotels, transport & communication |
26.4 |
3.0 |
1.6 |
3.6 |
2.9 |
3.9 |
2.8 |
(iii) Financing, insurance, real estate and business services |
20.6 |
12.9 |
12.9 |
12.1 |
14.1 |
12.4 |
10.4 |
(iv) Community, social & personal services |
12.9 |
5.6 |
10.6 |
3.6 |
5.7 |
3.3 |
9.1 |
IV. GDP at factor cost |
100.0 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
5.7 |
The index of industrial production (IIP) grew by 4.2
per cent in Q1 of 2014-15, its fastest pace in 11 quarters. The pick-up in industrial activity in Q1 was driven by
the capital goods sector, which recorded the highest
growth in the last three years. Mining activity also
recovered in Q1 from a 13-quarter slump and electricity
generation registered a record level of production.
However, its momentum fell in July 2014 as the IIP
growth slipped to 0.5 per cent. The slowdown in
manufacturing, especially the contraction in both
consumer durable goods and capital goods production
has added further uncertainty to the prospects for this
sector. Core infrastructure industries (coal, crude oil,
natural gas, refinery products, fertilisers, steel, cement
and electricity), which constitute 37.9 per cent of the
IIP, also lost some momentum in July.
Service sector activity, which constitutes two-thirds of
the domestic economy, picked up in Q1 of 2014-15,
expanding by 6.6 per cent. Within the sector, different
constituents moved at differing speeds. Construction
sector benefited from the delayed arrival of the southwest
monsoon. Community, social and personal
services also recorded robust growth. On the other
hand, the growth of financing, insurance, real estate
and business services lost some momentum, reflecting
the deceleration in growth of credit and deposits in the
banking system. Services PMI, after peaking in June 2014, has moderated in subsequent months. Lead
indicators of activity in the services sector for Q2
exhibit a mixed picture.
III.3. Cyclical and Structural Aspects of Growth
Dynamics
An assessment of the aggregate demand-supply balance
in the economy would be usefully informed by an
empirical measurement of its potential. This involves
an evaluation of two elements: (a) the cyclical behaviour
of output which provides insights into the role of
excess/deficient demand in the state of the economy;
and (b) trend output which enables a fuller evaluation
of the role of aggregate supply determined by the
production structure, institutional characteristics and
constraints thereon. Estimating variances in GDP over
the frequency domain helps to ascertain the presence
of cycles as well as to measure the duration of the
fluctuations. Disentangling of irregular, seasonal,
cyclical and trend components suggests that the
majority of cycles in India have a duration of about 2.7
years and cycles of shorter or longer durations are less
frequent in occurrence. The amplitude of cycles has
dampened over time, pointing to increasing resilience
of economic activity to shocks (Chart III.7).
Cycles are essentially fluctuations around its potential
trend. Potential output is intrinsically unobservable
and measuring it is challenging at all times, but
especially so in the wake of a major crisis. Measurement
typically suffers from high sensitivity to methodology:
for instance, the standard univariate filters suffer from
bias towards the choice of end points and lack an
underlying economic basis. Estimates from multivariate
filters derived from a small macroeconomic model
which minimise the sensitivity to end points, suggest
that India’s potential output growth has been falling
since 2008-09 to about 6.3 per cent in 2012-13 and since
then the output gap has turned negative (Chart III.8).
Juxtaposing estimates of average duration of cycles and
potential growth suggests that the Indian economy may
be approaching a turning point after two years of
sluggish growth but, given the decline in potential
output growth, the expansion phase may be shallower
than before.
Capacity utilisation levels and inventory cycles
provide information on the degree of slack in the
economy. The order books, inventories and capacity
utilisation survey (OBICUS) of the Reserve Bank points
to seasonally adjusted capacity utilisation recording a
modest decline in Q1 (Chart III.9). Finished goods as
well as raw material inventories as ratios of sales continued to decline in Q4 of 2013-14, corroborating
the presence of slack in the economy (Chart III.10).
In summary, there are tentative signs of investment
turning around in an environment of improving macroeconomic
fundamentals and political stability. Downside
risks to a durable pick-up in investment and growth
stem from domestic supply constraints, particularly
with regard to power, a reversal in the global interest
rate cycle and re-emergence of geopolitical risks.
1
IV. Financial Markets and Liquidity Conditions
Financial markets have been upbeat, reflecting ebbing volatility and strengthening confidence in the outlook shared
by domestic and foreign investors. Domestic money, debt and foreign exchange markets have remained stable and
stock prices reached record highs. Growth in credit in the banking system, however, has turned sluggish. The Reserve
Bank implemented a new liquidity management framework which provides greater assurance and flexibility on
liquidity.
IV.1. Financial Markets
Domestic financial markets have been buoyant through
Q2 of 2014-15, spurred by the risk-off search for yields
in international markets, and a pick-up in business
confidence domestically with the onset of political
stability. The ebbing of international crude oil prices
with the easing of geo-political tensions and
expectations of improvement in domestic macro-fundamentals
boosted market sentiment.
Overnight money market rates hardened during July
as liquidity condition was tight. From mid-August,
however, money market rates moderated, while in
September, barring a brief spike on account of advance
tax payments, rates eased below the liquidity
adjustment facility (LAF) repo rate. A distinct feature of
this period has been the drop in call money volumes,
reflecting shifts by banks to the collateralised overnight segments. The call money market currently accounts
for around 10 per cent of the total turnover in the
overnight segment (Chart IV.1). The thinness of the call
money market tended to amplify volatility in July and
early August with the top five borrowers accounting
for more than 50 per cent of call market turnover
(Chart IV.2).
In the government securities market, yields inched up
in the first half of July, trading with a bearish note as
geo-political tensions in the Middle East pushed up
crude oil prices. Subsequently, bullish sentiment
returned on the back of announcement of a new 10-year
benchmark security and re-adjustment of limits for
investment by foreign institutional investors (FIIs) in
government securities. Positive sentiment spilled over
into August, boosted by the reduction in notified
amounts under the remaining primary auctions for
the first half of the year as well as the easing of crude oil prices as tensions in the Middle East and Ukraine
abated. In September, yields moved in a tight range in
the absence of any triggers. The 10-year yield declined
through Q2 from 8.7 per cent at the end of June to 8.5
per cent on September 29 (Chart IV.3). Trading volumes
have declined sizeably throughout the quarter.
The corporate bond market recorded a pick-up in
activity during Q2 with an increase in offerings of public
issues and rights issues, partly reflecting tightening bank
credit conditions. Debt mobilisation through public
issues and private placements has been significantly
higher during July-August 2014 than that in the
preceding quarter. Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs)
invested `1,124 billion in the corporate bonds as on
September 29, 2014 which amounted to about 46 per
cent of the limit. Yields of AAA rated corporate bonds
generally moved in line with gilt yields, while spreads
have been broadly stable after picking up in early
August.
In the foreign exchange market, the exchange rate of
the rupee has moved in a narrow range of `59.7 and
`61.6 against the US dollar during the quarter. Pick up
in import demand and strengthening of the
US dollar modestly weakened the rupee in July and early
August. Thereafter, bunched inflows on account of FIIs,
particularly into the debt market, and positive sentiment sparked by a narrower than expected current
account deficit for Q1 as well as the credibility of fiscal
consolidation helped the rupee to appreciate. In
September, the rupee generally remained range-bound
with pessimism on US interest rate expectations offset
by positive sentiment triggered by the upturn in India’s
GDP growth in Q1 and easing of tensions in Ukraine.
The softening of crude oil prices also supported the
rupee. For the quarter as a whole, the rupee depreciated
against the US dollar albeit with some appreciating
bias during the second week of August to first week of
September. The rupee was at `61.43 against the US
dollar on September 29, 2014 (Table IV.1). The rupee
has been appreciating in nominal effective terms since
March 2014. Against the euro, the rupee appreciated
by 5.2 per cent during Q2. Since July, forward premia
have softened, tracking the spot market.
Equity markets rose through Q2 to reach historic highs
on formation of a stable government at the centre,
modest improvement in corporate earnings and
positive expectations following exemption granted to
banks by the Reserve Bank on reserve requirements
for raising funds for infrastructure. The uptrend
generally tracked global equity markets. Expectations
of quantitative easing by the ECB, sustained FII
investments (Chart IV.4), easing geo-political tensions and the resulting softening of crude oil prices and the
recent revision in India’s sovereign rating outlook from
negative to stable by Standard & Poor’s helped in
boosting equity markets.
Table IV.1: Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates: Trade-Based (Base: 2004-05=100) |
Item |
Index Sep 26, 2014 (P) |
Appreciation (+) / Depreciation (-) (Per cent) |
Sep 26, 2014 over Mar 2014 |
2013-14 over 2012-13 |
36-REER |
109.11 |
5.1 |
-2.2 |
36-NEER |
73. 30 |
2.0 |
-7.7 |
6-REER |
118.95 |
5.7 |
-3.7 |
6-NEER |
67.61 |
2.0 |
-10.6 |
`/US$ (as on Sep.29) |
61.43 |
-0.7 |
-10.1 |
`/Euro (as on Sep.29) |
77.93 |
8.2 |
-13.7 |
P: Provisional.
Notes: REER figures are based on Consumer Price Index (combined). |
Towards the end of the quarter, the equity markets
pared some of the gains on concerns following
geo-political tensions in Syria and the Supreme Court’s
verdict to de-allocate coal blocks. During Q2 so far (up
to September 29, 2014), both the BSE Sensex and NSE
Nifty recorded an increase of around 5 per cent. In the
primary market, activity picked up mainly on the back
of issuances through qualified institutional placements (QIPs) for debt repayment and capital expenditure. The
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) announced
a slew of measures related to IPOs and offers-for-sale,
including 25 per cent public shareholding norms for
public sector undertakings as also issued guidelines
for Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and
Infrastructure Investment Trusts. In addition, the
government decided to raise about `43.5 billion through
disinvestment of public sector undertaking (PSU)
shares.
The credit market has been subdued through Q2, with
non-food credit growth decelerating on account of risk
aversion related to asset quality as well as weak demand
in general. With deposit growth remaining largely flat,
a decline in credit growth led to a negative wedge (since
August 2014) between credit and deposit growth,
indicative of an increase in availability of structural
liquidity with banks (Chart IV.5). Mirroring the slowing
of bank credit growth, the flow of financial resources to
the commercial sector has been lower than a year ago
and higher funding has been obtained from non-bank
sources (Chart IV.6).
Bank credit to agriculture recorded a higher year-on-year
growth of 18.8 per cent in August 2014 as compared
with 12.1 per cent in August 2013. Growth in credit to
industry decelerated sharply to 7.6 per cent in August
2014 from 17.3 per cent in August 2013 with lower
growth in sectors such as infrastructure, basic metals,
textiles, chemicals and food processing industries.
Credit growth to the services sector also decelerated
substantially during this period (Chart IV.7). This
slowdown mainly reflects medium and large scale
industries sourcing funds through commercial paper
(CP) and external commercial borrowings (ECBs), sales
of assets by banks to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs), bulk repayments by oil/fertilizer PSUs and
reduction in banks’ exposures in view of the stress on
assets. During 2014-15 so far (up to September 25), term
deposit rates and weighted average lending rates
(WALR) have softened marginally. With moderation in
inflation, however, this has translated to a modest
tightening of credit conditions in real terms. The
transmission of policy actions across market segments
has been asymmetrical in various phases of the interest
rate cycle (Table IV.2).
IV.2. Liquidity Conditions
A key factor influencing financial market behaviour is
the movement of liquidity which, in turn, reflects the
interplay of structural and frictional factors impinging
on the system. A broad measure of liquidity encapsulating
the impact of both factors is money supply or M3. The
growth rate (year-on-year) of money supply at 13.2 per
cent during 2014-15 (up to September 5) has been
running somewhat higher than a year ago (Chart IV.8).
Table IV.2: Asymmetry in Transmission in Different Phases of Monetary Policy Cycles |
(To Deposit and Lending Rates of Banks) |
Item |
Variation (Percentage Points) |
Tightening Phase
Mar. 19, 2010
to Apr. 16, 2012) |
Easing Phase
(April 17,
2012 to
July 15, 2013) |
Tightening Phase
(Since July 16, 2013) |
Policy Rate (Repo Rate) |
3.75 |
-1.25 |
0.75 |
CRR |
-1.00@ |
-0.75 |
0.00 |
Call Rate |
4.98 |
-1.51 |
0.59 |
CBLO Rate |
5.43 |
-2.34 |
1.44 |
Market Repo Rate |
6.12 |
-1.49 |
0.89 |
91-Days Treasury Bill |
4.53 |
-1.29 |
1.11 |
3-Month CP Rate |
4.24 |
-2.17 |
0.64 |
3-Month CD Rate |
4.36 |
-2.08 |
0.79 |
5-Year Corporate Debt Yield |
0.93 |
-0.71 |
0.47 |
10-Year Corporate Debt Yield |
3.13 |
-1.02 |
0.34 |
5-Year G-Sec Yield |
1.05 |
-0.84 |
0.77 |
10- Year G-Sec Yield |
0.64 |
-1.10 |
0.98 |
Median Deposit Rate |
2.31 |
0.00 |
0.24 |
Median Base Rate |
2.75 |
-0.35 |
0.25 |
WALR
(Outstanding Rupee Loans) |
2.13 |
-0.44 |
-0.06# |
WALR (Fresh Rupee Loans) |
- |
- |
0.08# |
-: Not available. WALR: Weighted Average Lending Rate.
#: Data are till end- August 2014
@: CRR was cut to create the desirable liquidity conditions ahead of the repo rate cuts in next easing phase.
Note: Policy rate, deposit and base rates are at end-month while money and bond market rates are monthly average.
Source: Bloomberg and the Reserve Bank of India. |
The major components, i.e., currency with the public
and deposits, rose at a faster pace this year. Currency
demand was higher on account of the spending during
the general elections in April-May, but it has fallen back
to usual levels in subsequent months.
Movements in reserve money essentially capture the
Reserve Bank’s response to various autonomous forces
impacting liquidity conditions. The expansionary effects
of the Reserve Bank’s operations in the foreign
exchange market – which experienced sizable surplus
conditions through most of 2014-15 so far – were more
than offset by a decline in net domestic assets
(Chart IV.9).
The choice of instrument for liquidity management is
based on an assessment of the sources of liquidity
pressures from time to time - whether frictional or
structural; transient or lasting. With call rates trading
with a softening bias below the LAF repo rate during
the first week of July, a 4-day term reverse repo was
conducted to absorb excess liquidity, but it met with
a tepid response as market participants showed
reluctance to part with liquidity over periods beyond
24 hours. With spending by the government delayed
by the passing of the Union Budget, liquidity conditions
tightened again, and the call rates tended to hover above the repo rate, occasionally rising towards the MSF rate.
Six special term repos of tenors varying between 3-day
to 7-day for a cumulative amount of `650 billion were
conducted.
By the first week of August, liquidity eased as
Government spending began to gather momentum
and the call rate moved down again to sub-repo rate
levels. Thereafter, it reversed and as liquidity tightened on account of the build-up in cash balances of the
Government, the Reserve Bank conducted one special
term repo and two variable rate overnight repos, in
addition to its regular operations, for a total amount of
`247 billion (Chart IV.10). By mid-August, increasing
expenditure by the Government along with a pick-up
in deposits relative to credit off-take significantly
expanded system-wide liquidity through the rest of the
month and the first half of September. With effect from
September 5, the Reserve Bank revised and fine-tuned
its liquidity management framework under which
overnight variable rate reverse repo auctions were
conducted in the first half of September to absorb excess
liquidity (Box IV. 1).
In summary, the progressive evolution of the term
repo auctions as the main instrument of frictional
liquidity management is expected to improve the
transmission of policy impulses across the interest
rate spectrum. Money, debt and foreign exchange
markets have generally mirrored liquidity conditions
and will follow incoming information, both global and
domestic. Equity markets have displayed robust
optimism and may continue to be supported by the
global search for yields, although reversal in market
sentiments surrounding the US monetary policy
tightening remains a clear risk. Credit growth is
expected to pick-up in the second half of 2014-15 as
the industrial recovery gains momentum.
Box IV.1: Liquidity Projections and the New Liquidity Management Framework
The Reserve Bank’s operating framework of monetary
policy aims at anchoring the weighted average call
rate around the policy repo rate as the first leg of
monetary policy transmission. Liquidity management
broadly encompasses: (a) the ability to generate precise
projections of the likely evolution of the liquidity
conditions driven by autonomous factors; and (b) timely
use of appropriate discretionary liquidity injection/
absorption measures (Table IV.B.1). Near term forecasts
of liquidity incorporate full information judgement
and time series estimation to capture momentum,
seasonality and special factors such as festivals.
The Reserve Bank has put in place a revised liquidity
management framework since September 5, 2014. Its features include: (a) assured access to liquidity of
1 per cent of NDTL (excluding ECR) in the form of
bank-wise overnight fixed rate repos of 0.25 per cent
of NDTL and the balance through variable rate 14-
day term repos; (b) more frequent auction of term
repos during a fortnight, allowing flexibility to banks
to alter their liquidity assessment four times during
the fortnight and participate in auctions accordingly;
and (c) higher frequency of access to Reserve Bank’s
overnight liquidity, with the introduction of variable
rate overnight repos/reverse repo auctions between 3
to 3.30 PM, besides extending the timing of ECR facility
to 5 PM.
Table IV.B.1: Drivers of Liquidity Conditions |
(` billion) |
Item |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2013-14 (Up to Sep. 6) |
2014-15 (Up to Sep. 5) |
A. |
Autonomous Drivers of Liquidity (1+2+3+4) |
-1,738 |
-431 |
336 |
1,792 |
1. |
Net Purchases from ADs |
-153 |
586 |
-771 |
883 |
2. |
Currency with the Public |
-1,174 |
-1073 |
-232 |
-422 |
3. |
Government Cash Balance with RBI |
-406 |
-118 |
1,132 |
1,291 |
4. |
Others (residual) |
-5 |
174 |
207 |
40 |
B. |
Management of Liquidity (5+6+7+8) * |
1,970 |
1,550 |
-65 |
-2,512 |
5. |
Liquidity impact of LAF, MSF and Term Repos |
-455 |
944 |
-295 |
-2,062 |
6. |
Liquidity impact of OMO |
1,546 |
523 |
267 |
-78 |
7. |
Liquidity impact of refinance facilities |
355 |
83 |
-37 |
-372 |
8. |
First round liquidity impact of CRR change |
525 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
C. |
Change in Bank Reserves # (A+B) |
232 |
1,118 |
272 |
-720 |
*: -ve sign indicates absorption of liquidity and
+ve sign indicates injection of liquidity.
#: Includes vaults cash and adjusted for first round impact of CRR change. |
V. Global Environment
Economic activity in the advanced economies turned up in Q2 of 2014, while in emerging market economies, it
generally decelerated. Inflation in the advanced economies continues to be benign and below set targets, as economic
slack persists. Several emerging market economies continue to face inflationary pressures alongside sluggish activity.
Global commodity prices have eased and financial markets are buoyant, barring some volatility on geo-political
tensions in early August and intermittent reactions to incoming data.
V.1 Global Economic Conditions
Global economic activity shed some of the weakness
experienced in Q1 of 2014 – induced by harsh weather
and inventory adjustment – and picked up modestly
in Q2 on stronger consumer spending in the US and
the UK. Growth in the advanced economies (AEs) is
expected to firm up gradually through 2014 as financial
conditions ease and monetary policy remains highly
accommodative, but the recovery is vulnerable to
downside risks from weak investment activity and
possible escalation of geo-political tensions. Emerging
Market Economies (EMEs) generally experienced
deceleration of growth in Q2 – barring China on policy
stimulus and India on improved business sentiment
– and prospects for 2014 appear to be held back by
structural constraints and subdued consumption and
investment demand (Table V.1).
Table V.1:World Output and Trade Volume Growth (annual % change) |
|
2012 |
2013 |
2014P |
2015P |
World Output |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
4.0 |
Advanced Economies |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
United States |
2.8 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
3.0 |
Euro Area |
-0.7 |
-0.4 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
Japan |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
UK |
0.3 |
1.7 |
3.2 |
2.7 |
Canada |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
Emerging Market Economies |
5.1 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
5.2 |
Brazil |
1.0 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
2.0 |
Russian Federation |
3.4 |
1.3 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
China |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
Mexico |
4.0 |
1.1 |
2.4 |
3.5 |
South Africa |
2.5 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
2.7 |
World Trade Volume |
2.8 |
3.1 |
4.0 |
5.3 |
P: Projections.
Source: WEO, IMF July update. |
World trade growth has tracked the fragile recovery,
but the recent firming up appears hesitant, having
slipped behind global GDP growth since Q4 of 2011
(Table V.1). The World Trade Organization (WTO) has
lowered its world trade growth forecast for 2014 to 3.1
per cent in September from 4.7 per cent in April. This
is attributed to global recovery not being broad-based
and unsteady in the first half of 2014, trade slowdown
in major EMEs as a result of weak global recovery itself,
and escalation of geopolitical tensions.
Both AEs and EMEs are susceptible to risks of reversal
in sentiment and re-pricing of risk premiums in global
financial markets, especially if US long-term interest
rates rise faster than expected.
V.2 Global Inflation Developments
Inflation remains subdued in the AEs. In the US, annual
inflation declined to 1.7 per cent in August with core
inflation remaining unchanged. Inflation in Japan
increased sharply on the back of the hike in the value
added tax (VAT), but moderated to 3.4 per cent in July.
Excluding the impact of VAT, headline inflation was
much lower at 1.3 per cent in July, with core inflation
at 0.6 per cent. Euro area inflation remained unchanged
at 0.4 per cent in August, primarily on account of lower
energy prices. In the UK, inflation remains below the
Bank of England’s target of 2.0 per cent, declining to
1.5 per cent in August.
In EMEs, the picture is mixed with China experiencing
lower inflation due to weakening domestic demand,
while Brazil, Russia and Turkey face upside pressures
due to domestic food price pressures and exchange rate
depreciation. Other EMEs such as Indonesia and India
have undertaken policy-driven disinflation. Unlike in
the AEs, several EMEs continue to face inflationary pressures and their persistence suggests structural
characteristics, warranting a broader policy strategy
rather than merely front-loading of monetary policy.
World energy prices have begun to ease after remaining
largely range bound during 2014, with Brent prices
declining by 9.5 per cent between April and September
to US $ 97.5 per barrel in September (Chart V.1).
Notwithstanding risks of supply disruptions due to
geo-political conflicts, global supply has held up on
account of increased supplies from OPEC members and
higher production in the US. Market participants expect
oil prices to ease in the medium-term with Brent future
contracts for December 2015 being traded at US $ 99.7
per barrel as on September 26, 2014.
Non-energy prices have also been softening since May,
plateauing in July and August 2014. Global food prices,
which have been declining since March 2014, fell to a
seven-month low in August. This was driven by
reduction in grain prices since March following
plentiful harvests in the US (Chart V.2). The Food and
Agriculture Organisation (FAO) forecasts stable food
prices for the next 10 years.
Overall, commodity prices are expected to remain
stable, perhaps indicating the end of the commodity
super-cycle that started in the late 1990s (Box V.1).
V.3 Monetary Policy Stance
With well anchored inflation conditions and sizable
slack, central banks in the AEs have persevered with
highly accommodative monetary policies, with
forward guidance indicating that the policy stance will
remain supportive of the recovery. In September 2014,
the Fed kept its policy rate unchanged, but announced
a further reduction in its asset purchases by $10 billion to a total of $15 billion. The ECB further reduced its
key policy rate to 0.05 per cent and raised the charge
on deposits to -0.20 per cent in September in order to
encourage bank lending, and would start purchasing
asset-backed securities and covered bonds in October.
The Bank of Japan and the Bank of England have also
retained high accommodation in their monetary policy
stances, the former keeping unchanged the monetary base target, and the latter maintaining the policy rate
and size of the asset purchase programme (Chart V.3).
Box V.1: Has the Commodity Super-cycle Ended?
Commodity super-cycles are long and rapid rises in
prices across commodities, propelled by persistent
increases in demand outstripping supply. Since 1894,
four super-cycles have been identified, with the last
one starting from the late 1990s and attributed to rapid
and sustained industrialisation and urbanisation in
China and other emerging economies. In this latest
commodity super-cycle, inflation adjusted prices of
commodities rose in the range of 60 to 500 per cent
between 1999 and its peak in 2010. Oil price rose by 467
per cent, metals by 202 per cent and agricultural prices
by 77 per cent - the largest price increases among all
the four commodity super-cycles. Another striking
characteristic of the recent super-cycle relative to its
predecessors is high correlation across commodity
prices and high price volatility, possibly owing to
financialisation of commodity markets and increase
in supply disruptions due to natural disasters. The
sustained moderation in commodity prices since 2012 - across the board - from their peak levels has generated
some debate around the question of whether the latest
commodity super-cycle has come to an end. Given the
pace of innovation and physical investment, supply-side
costs are still rising due to resource depletion,
while EMEs are expected to grow without any drastic
reversal of commodity demand. In fact, commodity
prices have occasionally shown signs of reviving more
quickly than global economic activity. On the other
hand, the world economy may be entering a phase of
stable but secularly lower levels of growth, keeping
commodity prices stable but higher than the level that
prevailed before the current super-cycle phase began.
Asymmetric Christiano and Fitzgerald band pass filters
commonly used to identify commodity super cycles
show that both real energy prices and real non- energy
prices have already reached inflexion points and are
turning onto on a downward phase (Chart V.B1).
In EMEs, monetary policy stances have been mixed,
reflecting diverse domestic economic conditions as well
as inflationary and exchange rate pressures. Turkey has
started reducing its policy rate since May with
improving global liquidity conditions and moderation
of the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on inflation. Similarly, Chile has been slowly reducing its policy rate
since February 2014 due to weakening domestic activity.
By contrast, Russia has been on a tightening mode,
raising its policy rate since March 2014 to contain
inflationary pressures.
Brazil has been maintaining a high policy rate for the
past several months as inflationary pressures persist,
despite entering into recession. South Africa and
Malaysia have also raised policy rates in July to address
inflationary pressures. China and Indonesia, on the
other hand, have kept their policy rates steady for the
past several months (Chart V.4).
V.4 International Financial Markets
International financial markets are experiencing a
generalised ebbing of volatility since early 2014 as
‘taper’ fears subsided, and a widening of the search for
returns triggered a resurgence of capital flows. Although
volatility picked up in August 2014 on geo-political
concerns across bond and equity markets, losses have
been recovered by early September as risk appetite was
whetted by announcements of further stimulus in the
Euro area. The search for returns appears to have
resumed strongly while volatility has fallen back to new
lows. EME financial markets have been buoyed by the
reach for yields and the uptick in volatility in August
proved to be a temporary aberration, accompanied by some re-pricing of risk with country-specific accents.
The sharp rise in asset prices has raised the risk of
financial instability in the event of an unanticipated
bursting of building equity/ real estate bubbles.
The US dollar appreciated significantly against major
currencies since July as conditions for recovery in the
US economic activity became more favourable. In the
EMEs, currency markets stabilised with normalisation
of capital flows, barring sporadic responses to incoming
data. Reduced currency volatility also increased the
attractiveness for carry trade targeting EME currencies
in general (Chart V.5). The eventual reversal of carry
trade poses a major risk to macro-stability.
In sum, global economic slack would persist even
though recovery has modestly firmed in the advanced
economies. Structural constraints and political tensions
would mute growth in EMEs. As inflationary pressures
appear benign, given the economic slack and stable
commodity prices, AEs are likely to persist with their
easy monetary policy stance. Among EMEs confronted
with stubborn inflation experiences, the headroom for
monetary policy action may increasingly become
constrained by weaker than desirable economic activity.
While financial markets and commodity prices would
remain stable, an earlier than expected reversal in policy
rate in the US could put pressures on these markets.
ABBREVIATIONS
ADs |
Authorised Dealers |
AEs |
Advanced Economies |
ARC |
Asset Reconstruction Company |
Avg. |
Average |
BE |
Budget Estimates |
bn |
Billion |
BRICS |
Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa |
BSE |
Bombay Stock Exchange |
CAD |
Current Account Deficit |
CBLO |
Collateralised Borrowing and Lending Obligation |
CD |
Certificate of Deposit |
CG IIP |
Capital Goods-Index of Industrial Production |
CI |
Confidence Interval |
CII |
Confederation of Indian Industries |
CP |
Commercial Paper |
CPI |
Consumer Price Index |
CPI-AL |
Consumer Price Index - Agricultural Labourers |
CPI-C |
Consumer Price Index- Combined |
CPI-IW |
Consumer Price Index - Industrial Workers |
CPI-RL |
Consumer Price Index - Rural Labourers |
CRA |
Contingent Reserve Arrangement |
CRR |
Cash Reserve Ratio |
CU |
Capacity Utilisation |
ECB |
European Central Bank |
ECBs |
External Commercial Borrowings |
ECR |
Export Credit Refinance |
EMEs |
Emerging Market Economies |
FAO |
Food and Agriculture Organisation |
FCCBs |
Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds |
FDI |
Foreign Direct Investment |
FICCI |
Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry |
FIIs |
Foreign Institutional Investors |
FIs |
Financial Institutions |
FMCG |
Fast Moving Consumer Goods |
FPIs |
Foreign Portfolio Investors |
FY |
Financial Year |
GDP |
Gross Domestic Product |
GFCF |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
GFD |
Gross Fiscal Deficit |
GOI |
Government of India |
G-Sec |
Government Securities |
GST |
Goods and Services Tax |
HICP |
Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices |
IIF |
Institute of International Finance |
IIP |
Index of Industrial Production |
IMD |
Indian Meteorological Department |
IMF |
International Monetary Fund |
IPOs |
Initial Public Offerings |
IT |
Information Technology |
LAF |
Liquidity Adjustment Facility |
LPA |
Long Period Average |
LPG |
Liquefied Petroleum Gas |
M3 |
Money Supply |
m-o-m |
Month-on-Month |
MSCI |
Morgan Stanley Capital International |
MSF |
Marginal Standing Facility |
NCAER |
National Council of Applied Economic Research |
NCDs |
Non-Convertible Debentures |
NDA |
Net Domestic Asset |
NDS-OM |
Negotiated Dealing System-Order Matching |
NDTL |
Net Demand and Time Liabilities |
NEER |
Nominal Effective Exchange Rate |
NFA |
Net Foreign Assets |
NFC |
Non-Food Bank Credit |
NHPC |
National Hydro-electric Power Corporation |
NSE |
National Stock Exchange |
OBICUS |
Order Books, Inventories and Capacity Utilisation Survey |
OMCs |
Oil Marketing Companies |
OMO |
Open Market Operations |
ONGC |
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation |
OPEC |
Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries |
PDS |
Public Distribution System |
PE |
Provisional Estimates |
PFCE |
Private Final Consumption Expenditure |
PMI |
Purchasing Managers’ Index |
PPAC |
Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell |
POL |
Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants |
PRN |
Production Weighted Rainfall Index |
PSU |
Public Sector Undertaking |
QIPs |
Qualified Institutional Placements |
q-o-q |
Quarter-on-Quarter |
RBI |
Reserve Bank of India |
RD |
Revenue Deficit |
REER |
Real Effective Exchange Rate |
REITS |
Real Estate Investment Trusts |
SEBI |
Securities and Exchange Board of India |
SRS |
Systemic Risk Surveys |
SSCI |
Service Sector Composite Indicator |
UK |
United Kingdom |
ULC |
Unit Labour Cost |
US |
United States |
USD |
United States Dollar |
VAT |
Value Added Tax |
WACR |
Weighted Average Call Money Rate |
WALR |
Weighted Average Lending Rate |
WEO |
World Economic Outlook |
WPI |
Wholesale Price Index |
WTI |
West Texas Intermediate |
WTO |
World Trade Organisation |
y-o-y |
Year-on-Year |
|