Abstract
An important positive impact of demonetisation has been to induce a shift towards
formal channels of saving by households. During demonetisation and the subsequent
period, there has been a distinct increase in saving flows into equity/debt oriented
mutual funds and life insurance policies. Apart from this, non-banking financial
companies (NBFCs) seem to have been positively impacted in terms of collections
and disbursals. The challenge, going forward, would be channelising these funds
into productive segments of the economy.
Introduction
Demonetisation impacted various financial intermediaries differently. As explained
in the Mint Street Memo No. 1: “Demonetisation
and Bank Deposit Growth”, consolidated balance sheet of Scheduled
Commercial Banks (SCBs) experienced ‘excess’ deposit growth in the post-demonetisation
period. Non-banking financial intermediaries, such as, debt/equity oriented mutual
funds and insurance companies also gained, and the aggregate balance sheet of the
NBFC sector expanded by 14.5 per cent during 2016-17. This note provides a detailed
breakup of the financialisation of saving into three non-banking financial intermediaries:
mutual funds, insurance companies and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).
1. Mutual Funds
Reduction in interest rates on bank deposits after demonetisation and decline in
gold price enhanced the relative attractiveness of both debt and equity oriented
mutual funds. Reflective of this, assets under management by mutual funds (AUM)
touched an all-time high of more than ₹ 17.5 trillion by end-March 2017 and
further increased to ₹ 20 trillion at end-July 2017. The buoyant equity market
also improved the attractiveness of equity-oriented mutual funds. Resource mobilisation
under equity schemes more than doubled during this period. There were also net inflows
in the income/debt schemes in November 2016-June 2017 in contrast to net outflows
in November 2015-June 2016. This was reflected in a sharp increase in the overall
resources mobilised by mutual funds during November 2016-June 2017 compared with
the same period last year (Table 1). Higher resource
mobilisation by mutual funds after demonetisation has mainly been driven by retail
and high net worth individual (HNI) investors.
Table 1: Net inflows/outflows in mutual funds
|
(₹ billion)
|
Category
|
Nov 2015 - June 2016
|
Nov 2016 - June 2017
|
2015-16
|
2016-17
|
April-June
|
2017-18
|
Income / Debt Schemes
|
-328.6
|
386.2
|
330.1
|
2131.5
|
407.4
|
Equity Schemes
|
235.7
|
670.7
|
740.3
|
703.7
|
283.3
|
Balanced Schemes
|
111.4
|
436.5
|
197.4
|
366.1
|
222.6
|
Exchange Traded Fund
|
75.5
|
203.8
|
78.2
|
232.8
|
21.9
|
Fund of Funds Investing Overseas
|
-2.4
|
-1.9
|
-4.2
|
-3.6
|
-1.1
|
Total
|
91.6
|
1695.5
|
1341.8
|
3430.5
|
934.0
|
Source: Securities and Exchange Board of India
|
2. Life Insurance Companies
Premia collected by life insurance companies more than doubled in November 2016
(Table 2). Premia collected by Life Insurance Corporation
(LIC) of India increased by 142 per cent (y-o-y) in November 2016; collection by
private sector life insurance companies increased by nearly 50 per cent. About 85
per cent of the total collections by LIC of India in November 2016 were under the
‘single premium’ policies, which are paid in lump sum, unlike the non-single
premium policies that can be paid monthly, quarterly or annually. LIC of India revised
downward the annuity rates of its immediate annuity plan Jeevan Akshay VI purchased
from December 1, 2016, which might have created a spurt in collections in the month
of November 2016 for LIC of India. The cumulative collections during November 2016
to January 2017 increased by 46 per cent over the same period of the previous year.
Despite subsequent slowdown in the growth rate, the premium collections still witnessed
double digit growth during May-June 2017.
Table 2: Life insurance premia*
|
(₹ billion)
|
Month
|
Private Insurance cos.
|
y-o-y growth (%)
|
LIC
|
y-o-y growth (%)
|
Grand Total
|
y-o-y growth (%)
|
Nov-2016
|
35.3
|
48.9
|
125.3
|
141.9
|
160.6
|
112.7
|
Dec-2016
|
47.5
|
28.4
|
82.6
|
12.8
|
130.1
|
18.1
|
Jan-2017
|
44.1
|
23.8
|
87.2
|
29.8
|
131.4
|
27.8
|
Feb-2017
|
39.4
|
13.0
|
68.5
|
-12.3
|
107.9
|
-4.5
|
Mar-2017
|
93.8
|
17.8
|
253.0
|
7.5
|
346.8
|
10.1
|
Apr-2017
|
25.6
|
22.3
|
44.3
|
-24.7
|
69.9
|
-12.3
|
May-2017
|
33.9
|
4.5
|
84.1
|
14.2
|
118.0
|
11.2
|
Jun-2017
|
40.2
|
16.2
|
104.5
|
11.7
|
144.7
|
12.9
|
Nov-2016 to Jan-2017
|
126.9
|
31.8
|
295.1
|
53.5
|
422.1
|
46.3
|
Nov-2016 to Jun-2017
|
359.8
|
20.4
|
849.5
|
16.1
|
1209.4
|
17.4
|
* Data pertain to ‘first year premium’
Source: Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
|
3. Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)
Loans disbursed by all categories of NBFCs declined significantly in November 2016
compared with the monthly average disbursals during April-October 2016, especially
by micro finance companies (NBFC-MFIs) whose business is more cash intensive (Table 3a). Disbursements by Asset Finance Companies
(AFCs) and Loan Companies (LCs) continued to contract up to February 2017. Disbursals
turned positive from March 2017 and grew at a higher rate than the monthly average
disbursals recorded during April-October 2016. In the case of MFIs, however, disbursals
continued to contract in comparison with the monthly average of disbursals during
April-October 2016, possibly in view of the prevalent uncertainty of loan waivers
by state governments.
Table 3a: Disbursals by non-bank finance companies in India
|
Category
|
Monthly average disbursal (April-Oct 2016) in ₹ billion
|
% Change over monthly average disbursal of April-October 2016
|
Nov-16
|
Dec-16
|
Jan-17
|
Feb-17
|
Mar-17
|
Apr-17
|
May-17
|
Jun-17
|
Asset Finance Companies (12)
|
186.8
|
-14.6
|
9.2
|
-6.9
|
-2.5
|
48.7
|
-10.4
|
1.1
|
22.8
|
Loan Companies (13)
|
611.6
|
-24.7
|
-22.5
|
-19.3
|
-12.6
|
39.9
|
4.5
|
7.1
|
13.0
|
Micro Finance Companies (12)
|
94.1
|
-63.2
|
-71.4
|
-56.5
|
-42.3
|
-5.8
|
-47.8
|
-11.3
|
-15.3
|
Note: Figures in parenthesis pertain to number of companies covered
Source: Reserve Bank of India
|
In contrast, loans and collections (i.e., repayments of loans due) of AFCs and LCs
during November 2016-June 2017 grew significantly over the monthly average collections
during April-October 2016 (Table 3b). Collections
by NBFC-Micro Finance Companies (MFIs) declined during November 2016-February 2017
vis-à-vis April-October 2016, but witnessed an improvement during the months
of March, May and June 2017.
Table 3b: Collections by non-bank finance companies in India
|
Category
|
Monthly average collection (April-Oct 2016) in ₹ billion
|
% Change over monthly average collection of April-October 2016
|
Nov-16
|
Dec-16
|
Jan-17
|
Feb-17
|
Mar-17
|
Apr-17
|
May-17
|
Jun-17
|
Asset Finance Companies (12)
|
123.2
|
-4.3
|
7.7
|
5.5
|
5.1
|
19.4
|
5.3
|
13.1
|
7.7
|
Loan Companies (13)
|
355.8
|
3.9
|
14.9
|
4.5
|
6.4
|
58.9
|
24.9
|
21.0
|
38.9
|
Micro Finance Companies (12)
|
74.9
|
-8.8
|
-0.8
|
-3.7
|
-8.7
|
7.9
|
-3.8
|
5.2
|
1.4
|
Note: Figures in parenthesis pertain to number of companies covered
Source: Reserve Bank of India
|
Finally, bank credit to NBFCs decelerated from 5.1 per cent (y-o-y) in October 2016
to 1.3 per cent in November 2016, but subsequently improved to 10.9 per cent in
March 2017. In terms of the returns submitted by the reporting NBFCs, loans and
advances by NBFCs increased broadly at the same rate in the year ending March 2017
(16.4 per cent) as in the year ending March 2016 (16.6 per cent) (Table
4).
Table 4: Consolidated balance sheet of NBFC sector: Y-o-Y growth
|
(Per cent)
|
Items
|
Mar-16
|
Mar-17
|
1. Total Borrowings
|
15.3
|
15.0
|
2. Current Liabilities and Provisions
|
31.8
|
16.0
|
Total Liabilities / Assets
|
15.5
|
14.5
|
1. Loans & Advances
|
16.6
|
16.4
|
2. Investments
|
10.8
|
11.9
|
Income/Expenditure
|
|
|
1.Total Income
|
15.8
|
8.9
|
2. Total Expenditure
|
15.8
|
9.6
|
3. Net Profit
|
15.6
|
-2.9
|
Source: Reserve Bank of India
|
Going Forward…
Demonetisation appears to have led to an acceleration in the financialisation of
savings. In parallel, there is a shift towards greater formalisation of the economy
in the near term aided by the introduction of goods and services tax (GST) and regulations
such as the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) and the Benami
Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016. These developments may also incentivise
greater shift from physical to financial savings. The continuing weakness in real
estate activity and moderation in housing prices are also likely to further help
channel funds away from physical assets into financial savings. Finally, the recent
deceleration in inflation, as also, inflation expectations, has had the effect of
raising real incomes and returns for households, which may provide further impetus
to financial savings.
|